Fernandez-Sanchez Higinio, Marfo Emmanuel Akwasi, Santa Maria Diane, Mumba Mercy
The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA.
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2024 Sep 3;11:23333936241275266. doi: 10.1177/23333936241275266. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
This article explores the significance of employing preferred terms and inclusive language in research practices concerning diverse populations. It highlights how inappropriate terminology can lead to labeling, stereotyping, and stigma, particularly for equity-denied groups. The study aimed to identify and analyze terminology preferences for diverse communities by major international organizations. Through a systematic environmental scan methodology, data were collected from 12 prominent organizations. The results indicate a concerted effort toward adopting inclusive language, with organizations favoring respectful and accurate terminology. For instance, terms like "people made vulnerable by systemic inequities" and "migrant workers" were preferred over outdated or stigmatizing alternatives. The discussion emphasizes the importance of identifying conflicting terms and trends in terminology preferences over time. We recommend prioritizing the use of preferred terms to promote respectful and accurate discourse, with a focus on person-centered language. Ultimately, the findings underscore the critical role of language in shaping perceptions and attitudes toward diverse communities, and advocate for continued efforts to promote inclusivity and equity in research, policy, and practice.
本文探讨了在针对不同人群的研究实践中使用首选术语和包容性语言的重要性。它强调了不恰当的术语如何导致标签化、刻板印象和污名化,特别是对于被剥夺公平权利的群体。该研究旨在识别和分析主要国际组织对不同社区的术语偏好。通过系统的环境扫描方法,从12个著名组织收集了数据。结果表明,各组织在采用包容性语言方面做出了一致努力,倾向于使用尊重和准确的术语。例如,“因系统性不平等而变得脆弱的人”和“移民工人”等术语比过时或带有污名化的替代词更受青睐。讨论强调了识别随着时间推移术语偏好中相互冲突的术语和趋势的重要性。我们建议优先使用首选术语,以促进尊重和准确的话语,重点是以人为本的语言。最终,研究结果强调了语言在塑造对不同社区的看法和态度方面的关键作用,并倡导在研究、政策和实践中继续努力促进包容性和平等。