Hlyan Nay Phone, Alsadoun Lara, Hassan Muhammad Mustaneer Ul, Cheema Muhammad Junaid, Ali Asghar, Shehryar Abdullah, Rehman Abdur, Fareed Muhammad Usman
General Surgery, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, GBR.
Trauma and Orthopaedics, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, GBR.
Cureus. 2024 Aug 5;16(8):e66171. doi: 10.7759/cureus.66171. eCollection 2024 Aug.
This systematic review evaluates the impact of obesity on the outcomes of laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy, analyzing data from five key studies. The review explores differences in operative times, complication rates, conversion rates, and recovery times among obese patients undergoing these surgical procedures. The findings indicate that while laparoscopic cholecystectomy in obese patients tends to require longer operative times, it does not significantly increase complication rates compared to open cholecystectomy. However, the risk of conversion to open surgery is modestly elevated. The review highlights the necessity for surgical guidelines to adapt to the challenges posed by obesity, recommending advanced training and innovative technologies to improve surgical outcomes. Limitations such as study design heterogeneity and variability in defining obesity underscore the need for further research. This review contributes to optimizing surgical care strategies and improving patient outcomes in the growing demographic of obese surgical patients.
本系统评价通过分析五项关键研究的数据,评估肥胖对腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术结局的影响。该评价探讨了接受这些手术的肥胖患者在手术时间、并发症发生率、中转率和恢复时间方面的差异。研究结果表明,虽然肥胖患者的腹腔镜胆囊切除术往往需要更长的手术时间,但与开腹胆囊切除术相比,其并发症发生率并未显著增加。然而,中转开腹手术的风险略有升高。该评价强调了手术指南适应肥胖带来的挑战的必要性,建议进行高级培训和采用创新技术以改善手术结局。研究设计异质性和肥胖定义的变异性等局限性突出了进一步研究的必要性。本评价有助于优化手术护理策略,并改善肥胖手术患者不断增加的人群中的患者结局。