• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过公民大会创建通往公正和可持续粮食系统的途径。

Creating pathways to just and sustainable food systems with citizen assemblies.

作者信息

Schmid Patricia, Lamotte Léa, Curran Michael, Bieri Sabin

机构信息

Centre for Development and Environment (CDE), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Institute of Geography (GIUB), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Innovation (Abingdon). 2024 Jan 31;37(3):832-850. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2024.2309173. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1080/13511610.2024.2309173
PMID:39234561
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371257/
Abstract

Food systems affect and are affected by the interrelated crises of climate change, biodiversity loss, resource depletion and health, amongst others. Transforming to sustainable approaches is vital, yet entangled with uncertainties, complexity and a great value diversion with stakeholders. Deliberative processes such as citizen assemblies offer a valuable contribution to such a transformation, since the crises and their responses affect everyday life, and therefore inviting individual and collective action. Still, who is included and whose knowledge counts affects outcomes. Theoretically anchored in concepts of environmental justice, our study analyses three nation-wide citizens' assemblies on climate change and food systems from Western Europe. It assesses (a) how citizens' assemblies can incorporate a broad set of viewpoints and design more substantive political answers to current crises, and (b) whether citizens' assemblies include environmental justice aspects to facilitate social change. The paper argues that systematic and methodologically reflected inclusion of various positionalities can inspire decision-making processes in that they incorporate procedural, recognition, and distributional justice to address problems of climate change or modern food systems. It concludes with offering further approaches to include more than scientific knowledge in deliberative processes for a just transformation towards sustainability.

摘要

食物系统影响着气候变化、生物多样性丧失、资源枯竭和健康等相互关联的危机,同时也受到这些危机的影响。向可持续发展方式转型至关重要,但却与不确定性、复杂性以及利益相关者之间巨大的价值分歧纠缠在一起。诸如公民大会这样的审议过程为这种转型做出了宝贵贡献,因为这些危机及其应对措施影响着日常生活,从而促使个人和集体采取行动。然而,哪些人被纳入其中以及哪些人的知识算数会影响结果。我们的研究理论上以环境正义概念为基础,分析了西欧关于气候变化和食物系统的三次全国性公民大会。它评估了:(a)公民大会如何能够纳入广泛的观点,并为当前危机设计更具实质性的政治应对方案;(b)公民大会是否纳入了环境正义方面的内容以促进社会变革。本文认为,系统且在方法论上经过思考的不同立场的纳入能够激发决策过程,因为它们纳入了程序正义、认可正义和分配正义,以解决气候变化或现代食物系统的问题。文章最后提出了进一步的方法,以便在审议过程中纳入比科学知识更多的内容,从而实现向可持续发展的公正转型。

相似文献

1
Creating pathways to just and sustainable food systems with citizen assemblies.通过公民大会创建通往公正和可持续粮食系统的途径。
Innovation (Abingdon). 2024 Jan 31;37(3):832-850. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2024.2309173. eCollection 2024.
2
Are citizen juries and assemblies on climate change driving democratic climate policymaking? An exploration of two case studies in the UK.公民陪审团和气候变化问题集会是否推动了民主的气候政策制定?对英国两个案例研究的探讨。
Clim Change. 2021;168(1-2):5. doi: 10.1007/s10584-021-03218-6. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
3
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
4
Green politics beyond the state: radicalizing the democratic potentials of climate citizens' assemblies.超越国家的绿色政治:激进化气候公民大会的民主潜力。
Clim Change. 2023;176(6):73. doi: 10.1007/s10584-023-03550-z. Epub 2023 May 30.
5
The Food Equity and Environmental Data Sovereignty (FEEDS) Project: Protocol for a Quasi-Experimental Study Evaluating a Digital Platform for Climate Change Preparedness.食品公平与环境数据主权(FEEDS)项目:一项评估气候变化应对数字平台的准实验研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Sep 15;10(9):e31389. doi: 10.2196/31389.
6
How can policy and policymaking foster climate justice? A qualitative systematic review.政策及政策制定如何促进气候正义?一项定性系统评价。
Open Res Eur. 2023 Oct 10;3:51. doi: 10.12688/openreseurope.15719.2. eCollection 2023.
7
The use of citizens' juries in health policy decision-making: a systematic review.公民陪审团在卫生政策决策中的应用:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 May;109:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.005. Epub 2014 Mar 6.
8
Do consumer voices in health-care citizens' juries matter?医疗保健公民陪审团中的消费者声音重要吗?
Health Expect. 2016 Oct;19(5):1015-22. doi: 10.1111/hex.12397. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
10
Taxonomy for citizen actions on public health and climate change: a proposal.公共卫生和气候变化领域公民行动的分类学:一项提案。
Rev Saude Publica. 2022 Jan 5;55:119. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2021055003823. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
The second pandemic: Examining structural inequality through reverberations of COVID-19 in Europe.第二次大流行:通过欧洲新冠肺炎疫情的回响审视结构性不平等。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114634. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114634. Epub 2021 Dec 4.
2
The crisis of democracy and the science of deliberation.民主危机与审议科学。
Science. 2019 Mar 15;363(6432):1144-1146. doi: 10.1126/science.aaw2694.
3
Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems.人类世的食物:EAT-柳叶刀可持续食物系统健康饮食委员会
Lancet. 2019 Feb 2;393(10170):447-492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
4
Meat consumption, health, and the environment.肉类消费、健康与环境。
Science. 2018 Jul 20;361(6399). doi: 10.1126/science.aam5324.
5
Global land and water grabbing.全球土地及水资源掠夺
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Jan 15;110(3):892-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1213163110. Epub 2013 Jan 2.