• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重获得性创伤性损伤患者从强化康复病房出院后长期参与的早期预测因素。

Early predictors of long-term participation in patients with severe acquired traumatic injury discharged from Intensive Rehabilitation Unit.

机构信息

IRCCS Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation, Florence, Italy.

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct;60(5):802-809. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.07955-3. Epub 2024 Sep 5.

DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.24.07955-3
PMID:39235254
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11558457/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Participation represents the most relevant indicator of successful functioning after a severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI), since it correlates with a higher perceived quality of life by patients, their families, and healthcare professionals. Nevertheless, studies on Italian population are lacking.

AIM

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term participation and its early predictors in patients after a sTBI.

DESIGN

This paper is an observational retrospective single-site study with long-term follow-up.

SETTING

The Intensive Rehabilitation Units (IRU) of the IRCCS Don Gnocchi Foundation, Florence, Italy.

POPULATION

The population included adults who were admitted to the IRU after a sTBI from August 2012 to May 2020 and who underwent a longitudinal follow-up between September 2021 and April 2022.

METHODS

Patients were contacted by a phone interview including participation assessment using the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ). When the patients were unable to respond, the caregiver was interviewed. Early predictors of long-term participation at admission and discharge from the IRU were assessed by a univariate and a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Among one hundred and forty-nine eligible patients, 3 died during their IRU stay, 35 patients were lost at the follow-up, 5 refused to participate in the interview and 46 died between discharge and follow-up. Sixty patients (men: 48 [80%]; age: 53.8 [IQR: 34.1] years; time postonset [TPO]: 36.5 [IQR: 22] days; education level: 8 [IQR: 5] years; mean time event-follow-up: 5.8 [IQR: 3.5] years) were included. The total CIQ Score was 11 (0-28): Home integration score 4 (0-10), Social integration 6 (0-12) and Productive activity 0 (0-6). Among 33 patients who worked or studied before the event, 19 (57.6%) returned to their previous activities. Only a younger age was associated with a better long-term participation both at admission (B=-0.210, P<0.001, R=0.307) and at discharge (B=-0.173, P<0.001, R=0.398).

CONCLUSIONS

This study reveals that under the same umbrella label of sTBI there are patients whose trajectories of long-term participation recovery are extremely heterogeneous. Further studies on larger samples are needed to identify patients with better participation recovery profiles, to customize their rehabilitation pathway.

CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT

The present study provides relevant information to help clinicians in giving accurate information to caregivers and drawing adequate rehabilitation pathways.

摘要

背景

参与是严重创伤性脑损伤(sTBI)后成功功能的最相关指标,因为它与患者、他们的家人和医疗保健专业人员更高的感知生活质量相关。然而,针对意大利人群的研究还很缺乏。

目的

本研究旨在评估 sTBI 后患者的长期参与情况及其早期预测因素。

设计

这是一项具有长期随访的观察性回顾性单站点研究。

地点

意大利佛罗伦萨 Don Gnocchi 基金会的强化康复病房(IRU)。

人群

该人群包括 2012 年 8 月至 2020 年 5 月因 sTBI 入住 IRU 并于 2021 年 9 月至 2022 年 4 月期间进行纵向随访的成年人。

方法

通过电话访谈联系患者,包括使用社区融入问卷(CIQ)评估参与情况。当患者无法回答时,采访照顾者。通过单变量和多变量分析评估入院时和出院时长期参与的早期预测因素。

结果

在 149 名符合条件的患者中,3 人在 IRU 住院期间死亡,35 人在随访时失访,5 人拒绝接受访谈,46 人在出院和随访期间死亡。60 名患者(男性:48 [80%];年龄:53.8 [IQR:34.1] 岁;发病后时间 [TPO]:36.5 [IQR:22] 天;教育程度:8 [IQR:5] 年;平均发病后随访时间:5.8 [IQR:3.5] 年)被纳入研究。总 CIQ 评分为 11(0-28):家庭融入评分为 4(0-10),社会融入评分为 6(0-12),生产性活动评分为 0(0-6)。在发病前曾工作或学习的 33 名患者中,有 19 名(57.6%)恢复了之前的活动。只有年龄较小与入院时(B=-0.210,P<0.001,R=0.307)和出院时(B=-0.173,P<0.001,R=0.398)的长期参与更好相关。

结论

本研究表明,在相同的 sTBI 总称下,患者的长期参与恢复轨迹存在极大的异质性。需要对更大的样本进行进一步研究,以确定具有更好参与恢复特征的患者,从而为他们定制康复途径。

临床康复影响

本研究为临床医生提供了相关信息,有助于为照顾者提供准确的信息,并制定适当的康复途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad82/11558457/0e8d78928b58/7955-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad82/11558457/0e8d78928b58/7955-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ad82/11558457/0e8d78928b58/7955-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Early predictors of long-term participation in patients with severe acquired traumatic injury discharged from Intensive Rehabilitation Unit.严重获得性创伤性损伤患者从强化康复病房出院后长期参与的早期预测因素。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct;60(5):802-809. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.07955-3. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
2
Correlates of participation six months after stroke in an Italian population: results from the RIPS (Post-Stroke Intensive Rehabilitation) Study.卒中后 6 个月参与度的相关因素:来自 RIPS(卒中后强化康复)研究的结果。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Apr;59(2):125-135. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07639-6. Epub 2023 Feb 1.
3
Predictors of inpatient (neuro)rehabilitation after acute care of severe traumatic brain injury: An epidemiological study.重度创伤性脑损伤急性期治疗后住院(神经)康复的预测因素:一项流行病学研究。
Brain Inj. 2016;30(10):1186-93. doi: 10.1080/02699052.2016.1183821. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
4
Cognitive reserve index and long-term disability in patients with severe traumatic brain injury discharged from the intensive rehabilitation unit.认知储备指数与从强化康复单元出院的重度创伤性脑损伤患者的长期残疾情况
Front Neurol. 2023 May 5;14:1106989. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1106989. eCollection 2023.
5
Impact of decompressive craniectomy on functional outcome of severe acquired brain injuries patients, at discharge from intensive inpatient rehabilitation.去骨瓣减压术对重症获得性脑损伤患者在强化住院康复出院时的功能结局的影响。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Dec;44(26):8375-8381. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2015461. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
6
Community integration 2 years after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury.中度和重度创伤性脑损伤两年后的社区融入情况。
Brain Inj. 2015;29(7-8):915-20. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2015.1022880. Epub 2015 May 12.
7
Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in the Intensive Care Unit for Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: Analysis of the CENTER-TBI China Registry.重症监护病房严重创伤性脑损伤患者颅内压监测:CENTER-TBI 中国登记分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2022 Aug;37(1):160-171. doi: 10.1007/s12028-022-01463-w. Epub 2022 Mar 4.
8
Changes in health-related quality of life and factors predicting long-term outcomes in older adults admitted to intensive care units.老年重症监护病房患者健康相关生活质量的变化及其对长期预后的预测因素。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Apr;39(4):731-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318208edf8.
9
A fate worse than death? Long-term outcome of trauma patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit.比死亡更糟糕的命运?入住外科重症监护病房的创伤患者的长期结局。
J Trauma. 2009 Aug;67(2):341-8; discussion 348-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a5cc34.
10
Impact of rehabilitation in the neurointensive care unit on long-term survival in patients with traumatic brain injury.神经重症监护病房的康复治疗对创伤性脑损伤患者长期生存的影响。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2025 Apr;69(4):e70026. doi: 10.1111/aas.70026.

本文引用的文献

1
Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.创伤性脑损伤的远程随访技术:范围综述。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Oct;39(19-20):1289-1317. doi: 10.1089/neu.2022.0138.
2
Redefining a minimal rehabilitation assessment protocol for severe acquired brain injuries.重新定义严重后天性脑损伤的最小康复评估方案。
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Aug;58(4):584-591. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.22.07451-2. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
3
Long-term follow-up of neurodegenerative phenomenon in severe traumatic brain injury using MRI.
利用 MRI 对严重创伤性脑损伤的神经退行性现象进行长期随访。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2022 Nov;65(6):101599. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2021.101599. Epub 2022 Feb 15.
4
Considering Biological Sex in Traumatic Brain Injury.在创伤性脑损伤中考虑生物性别因素。
Front Neurol. 2021 Feb 10;12:576366. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.576366. eCollection 2021.
5
T-MoCA: A valid phone screen for cognitive impairment in diverse community samples.T-MoCA:一种适用于不同社区样本认知障碍的有效电话筛查工具。
Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2021 Feb 5;13(1):e12144. doi: 10.1002/dad2.12144. eCollection 2021.
6
Emergency care surveillance and emergency care registries in low-income and middle-income countries: conceptual challenges and future directions for research.低收入和中等收入国家的急诊护理监测与急诊护理登记系统:概念挑战与未来研究方向
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Jul 29;4(Suppl 6):e001442. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001442. eCollection 2019.
7
Feasibility of telephone-administered interviews to evaluate long-term outcomes of trauma patients in urban Ethiopia.通过电话访谈评估埃塞俄比亚城市创伤患者长期预后的可行性
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2018 Nov 30;3(1):e000256. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2018-000256. eCollection 2018.
8
Predicting the Trajectory of Participation After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Longitudinal Analysis.预测创伤性脑损伤后参与情况的轨迹:一项纵向分析。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):257-265. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000383.
9
Traumatic brain injury: integrated approaches to improve prevention, clinical care, and research.创伤性脑损伤:改善预防、临床护理和研究的综合方法。
Lancet Neurol. 2017 Dec;16(12):987-1048. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30371-X. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
10
Severe Brain Injury in Massachusetts: Assessing the Continuum of Care.马萨诸塞州的重度脑损伤:评估连续护理情况。
Issue Brief (Mass Health Policy Forum). 2015 Dec 10(45):1-62.