Dinçer Burak, Ömeroğlu Sinan, Ethem Akgün İsmail
Department of Surgical Oncology, Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkiye.
Department of General Surgery, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkiye.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2024 Dec;34(12):1084-1087. doi: 10.1089/lap.2024.0223. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
Total extraperitoneal (TEP) approach is one of the commonly used minimally invasive method in inguinal hernia repair. There are limited data that compares the results of the telescopic dissection and balloon trocar for preperitoneal dissection. In our study, we aimed to retrospectively evaluate the TEP cases performed at our center and compare the results of these two techniques. TEP cases performed between 2020 and 2024 were evaluated. Strangulated and recurrent hernia cases were excluded. Telescopic dissection and balloon trocar techniques were compared in terms of conversion, postoperative pain, complications, and recurrence. A total of 177 patients were included. Telescopic method was used in 122 cases, while a balloon trocar was used in 55 cases. The median age was 50 years (range: 20-86), and 163 patients (92%) were male. Bilateral inguinal hernia was present in 61 patients (35%). The median operative time was 100 minutes (IQR: 80-120 minutes). Conversion was required in a total of 3 cases (1.5%); specifically, the transabdominal preperitoneal method was employed in 2 cases, and Lichtenstein-style anterior approach hernia repair was performed in one case. Between the telescopic dissection and balloon trocar groups, no significant differences were observed in operation time ( = .407), conversion rates ( = .228), postoperative pain scores ( = .505, = .264, = .681, = .743), complication rates ( = .205), or recurrence rates ( = .311). The results of using a balloon trocar and telescopic dissection in inguinal hernia repair with TEP are similar, and telescopic dissection could be a cost-effective alternative to the balloon trocar.
完全腹膜外(TEP)入路是腹股沟疝修补术中常用的微创方法之一。比较腹腔镜下分离与球囊穿刺套管进行腹膜前分离结果的数据有限。在我们的研究中,我们旨在回顾性评估在我们中心进行的TEP病例,并比较这两种技术的结果。对2020年至2024年间进行的TEP病例进行了评估。排除绞窄性和复发性疝病例。从中转率、术后疼痛、并发症和复发方面比较了腹腔镜下分离和球囊穿刺套管技术。共纳入177例患者。122例采用腹腔镜下分离法,55例采用球囊穿刺套管法。中位年龄为50岁(范围:20 - 86岁),163例患者(92%)为男性。61例患者(35%)存在双侧腹股沟疝。中位手术时间为100分钟(四分位间距:80 - 120分钟)。总共3例(1.5%)需要中转;具体而言,2例采用经腹腹膜前法,1例采用Lichtenstein式前路疝修补术。在腹腔镜下分离组和球囊穿刺套管组之间,手术时间(P = .407)、中转率(P = .228)、术后疼痛评分(P = .505、P = .264、P = .681、P = .743)、并发症发生率(P = .205)或复发率(P = .311)均未观察到显著差异。在TEP腹股沟疝修补术中使用球囊穿刺套管和腹腔镜下分离的结果相似,并且腹腔镜下分离可能是球囊穿刺套管的一种经济有效的替代方法。