Misra Mahesh C, Kumar Sareesh, Bansal Virinder K
Department of Surgical Disciplines, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India.
Surg Endosc. 2008 Sep;22(9):1947-58. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9897-9. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
Creation of extraperitoneal space during TEP repair requires an expensive commercially available balloon.
Fifty-six patients suffering from uncomplicated primary unilateral or bilateral groin hernia were randomized into two groups; group 1--indigenous balloon dissection and group 2--direct telescopic dissection.
There were 55 males and 1 female, with an average age of 49 years; 50% of the inguinal hernias were bilateral. Creation of extraperitoneal space was considered as satisfactory in majority of patients (94.6%) with satisfactory anatomical delineation. Peritoneal breach was noticed during dissection in 36 (64.3%) patients. There was one (3.8%) conversion of TEP to TAPP in group 2. Distance between pubic symphysis to umbilicus was an important factor, which affected the easiness of dissection. In patients with this distance <or=14 cm lateral placement of ports was considered for easy use of graspers. The incidence of scrotal edema was significantly higher in group 2 as compared with group 1 (p < 0.01). Patients with indirect inguinal hernias in group 2 presented with a greater number of scrotal edema. Pain score on VAS at 6 h after surgery was significantly higher in group 2 (p < 0.021). Patients with age <65 years, bilateral hernias, and indirect hernias had a correlation with higher pain score at 6 h. Of the patients, 17.9% developed seroma in group 1 versus 64.3% in group 2 (p < 0.001).
Anatomical delineation of inguinal area and dissection in the extraperitoneal space in TEP repair was equally satisfactory with both low-cost indigenous balloon (group 1) and telescopic dissection (group 2). Balloon dissection was associated with significantly reduced postoperative pain at 6 h, scrotal edema, and seroma formation. However at 3 months follow-up balloon dissection did not offer significant advantage over direct telescopic dissection in the overall long-term outcome of TEP repairs. If balloon dissection is considered useful for the beginner, low-cost indigenous balloon may be used to avoid higher cost of commercially available balloon dissector with added early advantages.
经腹膜前修补术(TEP)中创建腹膜外间隙需要使用昂贵的商用球囊。
56例患有单纯原发性单侧或双侧腹股沟疝的患者被随机分为两组;第1组——自制球囊分离组,第2组——直接腹腔镜分离组。
55例男性,1例女性,平均年龄49岁;50%的腹股沟疝为双侧。大多数患者(94.6%)的腹膜外间隙创建情况令人满意,解剖结构清晰。36例(64.3%)患者在分离过程中发现腹膜破裂。第2组中有1例(3.8%)患者由TEP转为经腹腔腹膜前修补术(TAPP)。耻骨联合至脐的距离是影响分离难易程度的重要因素。对于该距离≤14 cm的患者,为便于使用抓钳,考虑将端口外侧放置。第2组阴囊水肿的发生率显著高于第1组(p<0.01)。第2组中腹股沟斜疝患者的阴囊水肿更为常见。术后6小时视觉模拟评分(VAS)疼痛评分第2组显著更高(p<0.021)。年龄<65岁、双侧疝和斜疝患者术后6小时疼痛评分更高。第1组患者血清肿发生率为17.9%,第2组为64.3%(p<0.001)。
在TEP修补术中,使用低成本自制球囊(第1组)和腹腔镜分离(第2组)对腹股沟区进行解剖分离并在腹膜外间隙进行操作,效果同样令人满意。球囊分离术可使术后6小时疼痛、阴囊水肿和血清肿形成显著减轻。然而,在3个月的随访中,在TEP修补术的总体长期效果方面,球囊分离术相比直接腹腔镜分离术并无显著优势。如果认为球囊分离术对初学者有用,可使用低成本自制球囊,以避免商用球囊分离器的高成本,并具有额外早期优势。