Tran H, Tran K, Turingan I, Zajkowska M, Lam V, Hawthorne W
Discipline of Surgery, Sydney Medical School at Westmead Hospital, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia,
Hernia. 2015 Jun;19(3):407-16. doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1349-6. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
Our recent prospective randomized controlled trial (NCT01660048) comparing single-incision laparoscopic (SIL) totally extraperitoneal (TEP) and multi-incision inguinal herniorraphy confirmed safety, efficacy and benefits of single-incision approach. This study (NCT01883115) aimed to assess safety, efficacy and cost effectiveness of telescopic extraperitoneal dissection.
Patients with inguinal/femoral hernias from February 2013 to February 2014 undergoing SILTEP herniorraphy with telescopic dissection were compared with patients who had previously undergone SILTEP herniorraphy with balloon dissection. Costs of different ports/trocars were analysed.
There were 102 patients in telescopic compared to 51 in balloon dissection group; these had no significant differences in age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists and pre-op visual analogue scores. Telescopic vs. balloon showed: post-operative pain-day one 2.5 vs. 2.5; p = 0.90, day seven 0 vs. 0; p = 0.02 (0 vs. 1; p < 0.01 for bilateral hernias); operation times-unilateral 48.0 vs. 48.0 min; p = 0.88 and bilateral 70.0 vs. 65.0 min; p = 0.66, length of hospital stay 1.0 vs. 1.0 day, analgesic intake (dextropropoxyphene) 6.0 vs. 6.0 tablets; p = 0.95, return to work/normal physical activities 7.0 vs. 7.0 days; p = 0.46 and cosmetic scar scores 24.0 vs. 24.0, respectively. There was no conversion to open surgery/need for additional ports in either group. Median scar length for telescopic group was 13.0 mm. Costs of disposable ports/trocars for telescopic and balloon groups were US$480 and $720, respectively. There were no morbidities/recurrences with follow-up of 2-36 months.
Telescopic extraperitoneal dissection during SILTEP inguinal herniorraphy represents a safe and efficient alternative with potential cost savings compared to balloon dissection.
我们最近的一项前瞻性随机对照试验(NCT01660048)比较了单切口腹腔镜完全腹膜外(SIL-TEP)腹股沟疝修补术和多切口腹股沟疝修补术,证实了单切口方法的安全性、有效性和益处。本研究(NCT01883115)旨在评估可伸缩腹膜外剥离术的安全性、有效性和成本效益。
将2013年2月至2014年2月接受SIL-TEP疝修补术并采用可伸缩剥离术的腹股沟/股疝患者与先前接受SIL-TEP疝修补术并采用球囊剥离术的患者进行比较。分析了不同端口/套管针的成本。
可伸缩剥离术组有102例患者,球囊剥离术组有51例患者;两组在年龄、性别、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会分级和术前视觉模拟评分方面无显著差异。可伸缩剥离术与球囊剥离术相比:术后第1天疼痛程度为2.5 vs. 2.5;p = 0.90,第7天为0 vs. 0;p = 0.02(双侧疝为0 vs. 1;p < 0.01);单侧手术时间为48.0 vs. 48.0分钟;p = 0.88,双侧为70.0 vs. 65.0分钟;p = 0.66,住院时间为1.0 vs. 1.0天,镇痛药摄入量(右丙氧芬)为6.0 vs. 6.0片;p = 0.95,恢复工作/正常体力活动时间为7.0 vs. 7.0天;p = 0.46,美容瘢痕评分分别为24.0 vs. 24.0。两组均无转为开放手术/需要额外端口的情况。可伸缩剥离术组的中位瘢痕长度为