Schwartz Abby J, Richman Alice R, Torres Essie
School of Social Work, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Department of Health Education and Promotion, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
J Community Health. 2025 Feb;50(1):71-80. doi: 10.1007/s10900-024-01396-9. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
Racially and ethnically diverse populations and individuals residing in rural areas were disproportionally impacted by the coronavirus pandemic, and Eastern North Carolina (ENC) is one region where such impacts were apparent. To understand at-risk individuals' perceptions and hesitancy to COVID-19 vaccines and the preferred means of receiving vaccination-related messages, we conducted four qualitative focus groups (N = 40) with diverse rural ENC residents. The analysis of the focus group transcripts revealed five themes: (1) reasons people trusted the COVID-19 vaccines, (2) reasons people mistrusted the COVID-19 vaccines, (3) the best means to deliver messages regarding COVID-19 vaccination, (4) the individuals trusted most to deliver such messages, and (5) the decisions people made regarding whether to get vaccinated and how that was connected to God. By incorporating participant perspectives and preferences in receiving messaging into campaigns, there is a potential for greater vaccine uptake.
种族和民族多样化的人群以及居住在农村地区的个人受到新冠疫情的影响尤为严重,北卡罗来纳州东部(ENC)就是一个此类影响明显的地区。为了解高危人群对新冠疫苗的认知、犹豫态度以及接收疫苗相关信息的首选方式,我们对北卡罗来纳州东部农村地区的不同居民进行了四个定性焦点小组访谈(N = 40)。对焦点小组访谈记录的分析揭示了五个主题:(1)人们信任新冠疫苗的原因,(2)人们不信任新冠疫苗的原因,(3)传递新冠疫苗接种信息的最佳方式,(4)最受信任传递此类信息的个人,以及(5)人们关于是否接种疫苗的决定以及这与上帝的联系。通过将参与者在接收信息方面的观点和偏好纳入宣传活动中,有可能提高疫苗接种率。