• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于示波脉搏波分解的动脉反射波时相估计血压。

Blood Pressure Estimation Based on the Timing of the Arterial Reflected Waves by Oscillometric Pulse Wave Decomposition.

出版信息

IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2024 Nov;28(11):6653-6660. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3455100. Epub 2024 Nov 6.

DOI:10.1109/JBHI.2024.3455100
PMID:39236136
Abstract

Recent innovations in oscillometric blood pressure (BP) estimation leveraging pulse transit time (PTT) show promise even when pulse amplitude is compromised. However, current PTT methods often require multiple sensors. This study introduces a novel approach for oscillometric BP estimation utilizing only a single sensor. Our method simplifies PTT measurement through decomposing oscillometric pulses into forward and reflected wave components. Notably, we found that the time interval between the forward and first reflected wave is shortest when cuff pressure is at the systolic level, while the interval between the first and second reflected waves is longest when the cuff pressure corresponds to the diastolic level. To validate our method, we extensively analyzed two datasets: the first comprised 150 arm oscillometric recordings from 10 healthy individuals, and the second included 425 wrist oscillometric recordings from 85 healthy individuals. Our analysis revealed minimal standard deviation errors for BP measurements: 7.03 mmHg (systolic) and 5.96 mmHg (diastolic) for arm recordings, and 7.98 mmHg (systolic) and 5.39 mmHg (diastolic) for wrist recordings. Across both datasets, the mean error for both systolic and diastolic BP measurements was merely 0.01 mmHg, underscoring the precision of the method. Comparative analysis against established methodologies further affirmed the superior performance of our approach, which also met the ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2 standard. While our dataset primarily comprises recordings from healthy individuals, further validation on diverse datasets encompassing challenging cases such as obesity, arterial stiffness, and atrial fibrillation is imperative to evaluate its applicability across various clinical scenarios.

摘要

最近利用脉搏传输时间(PTT)进行的示波法血压(BP)估计的创新技术显示出了希望,即使在脉搏幅度受到影响的情况下也是如此。然而,当前的 PTT 方法通常需要多个传感器。本研究提出了一种利用单个传感器进行示波法 BP 估计的新方法。我们的方法通过将示波脉冲分解为正向波和反射波分量来简化 PTT 测量。值得注意的是,我们发现当袖带压力处于收缩压水平时,正向波和第一反射波之间的时间间隔最短,而当袖带压力对应舒张压水平时,第一反射波和第二反射波之间的时间间隔最长。为了验证我们的方法,我们对两个数据集进行了广泛分析:第一个数据集包含 10 名健康个体的 150 次手臂示波记录,第二个数据集包含 85 名健康个体的 425 次手腕示波记录。我们的分析表明,BP 测量的标准偏差误差最小:手臂记录为 7.03mmHg(收缩压)和 5.96mmHg(舒张压),手腕记录为 7.98mmHg(收缩压)和 5.39mmHg(舒张压)。在两个数据集上,收缩压和舒张压的平均误差都仅为 0.01mmHg,这突出了该方法的精度。与已建立的方法进行的比较分析进一步证实了我们方法的卓越性能,该方法也符合 ANSI/AAMI/ISO81060-2 标准。虽然我们的数据集主要包含来自健康个体的记录,但在包含肥胖、动脉僵硬和心房颤动等挑战性病例的多样化数据集中进行进一步验证,对于评估其在各种临床情况下的适用性至关重要。

相似文献

1
Blood Pressure Estimation Based on the Timing of the Arterial Reflected Waves by Oscillometric Pulse Wave Decomposition.基于示波脉搏波分解的动脉反射波时相估计血压。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2024 Nov;28(11):6653-6660. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3455100. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
2
Characteristic Ratio-Independent Arterial Stiffness-Based Blood Pressure Estimation.基于特征比率无关动脉僵硬度的血压估计
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017 Sep;21(5):1263-1270. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2594177. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
3
Coefficient-free blood pressure estimation based on pulse transit time-cuff pressure dependence.基于脉搏传输时间-袖带压力相关性的无系数血压估计。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013 Jul;60(7):1814-24. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2013.2243148. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
4
Cuffless Estimation of Blood Pressure: Importance of Variability in Blood Pressure Dependence of Arterial Stiffness Across Individuals and Measurement Sites.无袖带血压估计:个体间和测量部位动脉僵硬度与血压依赖性变异性在血压估计中的重要性。
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018 Nov;65(11):2377-2383. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2823333. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
5
Multi-Sensor Fusion Approach for Cuff-Less Blood Pressure Measurement.多传感器融合方法在无袖带血压测量中的应用。
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2020 Jan;24(1):79-91. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2901724. Epub 2019 Mar 15.
6
Estimation of mean arterial pressure from the oscillometric cuff pressure: comparison of different techniques.从振荡袖带压力估算平均动脉压:不同技术的比较。
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2011 Jan;49(1):33-9. doi: 10.1007/s11517-010-0694-y. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
7
Improved Measurement of Blood Pressure by Extraction of Characteristic Features from the Cuff Oscillometric Waveform.通过从袖带示波波形中提取特征来改进血压测量
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Jun 16;15(6):14142-61. doi: 10.3390/s150614142.
8
Comparison of oscillometric blood pressure measurements at the wrist with an upper-arm auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer.手腕处示波法血压测量与上臂听诊式汞血压计测量的比较。
Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 1999 May-Jun;26(5-6):477-81. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1681.1999.03059.x.
9
Validity of transit time-based blood pressure measurements in patients with and without heart failure or pulmonary arterial hypertension across different breathing maneuvers.基于传输时间的血压测量在伴有或不伴有心力衰竭或肺动脉高压的患者中在不同呼吸动作下的有效性。
Sleep Breath. 2020 Mar;24(1):221-230. doi: 10.1007/s11325-019-01848-w. Epub 2019 May 2.
10
Accuracy and User Acceptability of 24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring by a Prototype Cuffless Multi-Sensor Device Compared to a Conventional Oscillometric Device.原型无袖带多传感器设备与传统示波法设备 24 小时动态血压监测的准确性和用户可接受性比较。
Blood Press. 2023 Dec;32(1):2274595. doi: 10.1080/08037051.2023.2274595. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Credence of device acceptability: a statistical method for comparing blood pressure measurement device accuracy across studies.设备可接受性的可信度:一种比较不同研究中血压测量设备准确性的统计方法。
J Hum Hypertens. 2025 Jul 10. doi: 10.1038/s41371-025-01040-6.