Davenport R A, Krug I, Dang P L, Rickerby N, Kiropoulos L
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
J Psychosom Res. 2024 Dec;187:111906. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2024.111906. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
This meta-analytic review aimed to synthesise evidence on personality and cognitive factors related to depression and anxiety in endometriosis and determine whether sociodemographic and clinical variables moderate factor-symptom relations. Additionally, this review aimed to evaluate the quality of research and formulate recommendations for future research.
A systematic search was conducted across databases (Medline, Embase, PsycInfo, Web of Science, ProQuest) through to February 2024. Search terms were used for endometriosis, depression, anxiety, cognitive factors and personality traits. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to produce pooled weighted effects (r) for factor-symptom relationships.
Thirteen studies (11 samples; N = 3287; M 33.89 ± 2.48) were included in a narrative synthesis. One study provided evidence for a positive association between neuroticism and depression. Seven studies contributed to meta-analyses on three cognitive factors. Medium-to-large associations were identified between illness perceptions of low control/power (r = 0.35, 95 % CI: 0.01,0.62), rumination (r = 0.52, 95 % CI: 0.09, 0.78), pain-catastrophising (r = 0.37, 95 % CI: 0.28, 0.45) and higher levels of depression. The statistical power to detect significant effects was >80 %. Findings for anxiety were non-significant, although limited data were available. Quality appraisal revealed a high risk of within-study bias (4.69 ± 1.38, range: 3-7), with issues related to sample representativeness and measurement selection.
Rumination, pain-catastrophising, and illness perceptions of low control/power are important in understanding depression in endometriosis. There is a lack of research on personality traits, necessitating further study. Findings highlight the importance of prioritising modifiable cognitive factors in psychological research and clinical practice in endometriosis.
本荟萃分析旨在综合子宫内膜异位症中与抑郁和焦虑相关的人格及认知因素的证据,并确定社会人口统计学和临床变量是否会调节因素与症状之间的关系。此外,本综述旨在评估研究质量并为未来研究制定建议。
截至2024年2月,在多个数据库(Medline、Embase、PsycInfo、Web of Science、ProQuest)中进行了系统检索。检索词用于子宫内膜异位症、抑郁、焦虑、认知因素和人格特质。进行随机效应荟萃分析以得出因素与症状关系的合并加权效应(r)。
13项研究(11个样本;N = 3287;M = 33.89 ± 2.48)纳入叙述性综合分析。一项研究提供了神经质与抑郁之间呈正相关的证据。7项研究为3个认知因素的荟萃分析做出了贡献。在低控制感/低权力感的疾病认知(r = 0.35,95% CI:0.01,0.62)、反刍思维(r = 0.52,95% CI:0.09,0.78)、疼痛灾难化(r = 0.37,95% CI:0.28,0.45)与较高水平的抑郁之间发现了中等到较大的关联。检测显著效应的统计功效>80%。尽管可用数据有限,但焦虑方面的研究结果不显著。质量评估显示研究内部存在较高的偏倚风险(4.69 ± 1.38,范围:3 - 7),存在与样本代表性和测量选择相关的问题。
反刍思维、疼痛灾难化以及低控制感/低权力感的疾病认知对于理解子宫内膜异位症中的抑郁很重要。关于人格特质的研究较少,需要进一步研究。研究结果凸显了在子宫内膜异位症的心理学研究和临床实践中优先考虑可改变的认知因素的重要性。