• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

诊断相关案例的根本原因分析。

Root cause analysis of cases involving diagnosis.

机构信息

Plymouth, MA, USA.

ATW Health Solutions, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Sep 3;11(4):353-368. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0102. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1515/dx-2024-0102
PMID:39238228
Abstract

Diagnostic errors comprise the leading threat to patient safety in healthcare today. Learning how to extract the lessons from cases where diagnosis succeeds or fails is a promising approach to improve diagnostic safety going forward. We present up-to-date and authoritative guidance on how the existing approaches to conducting root cause analyses (RCA's) can be modified to study cases involving diagnosis. There are several diffierences: In cases involving diagnosis, the investigation should begin immediately after the incident, and clinicians involved in the case should be members of the RCA team. The review must include consideration of how the clinical reasoning process went astray (or succeeded), and use a human-factors perspective to consider the system-related contextual factors in the diagnostic process. We present detailed instructions for conducting RCA's of cases involving diagnosis, with advice on how to identify root causes and contributing factors and select appropriate interventions.

摘要

诊断错误是当今医疗保健中对患者安全的主要威胁。学习如何从诊断成功或失败的案例中吸取教训,是提高诊断安全性的一个很有前途的方法。我们提供了最新和权威的指导,介绍如何修改现有的根本原因分析(RCA)方法来研究涉及诊断的案例。有几个不同之处:在涉及诊断的案例中,调查应在事件发生后立即开始,并且参与该案例的临床医生应成为 RCA 团队的成员。审查必须包括考虑临床推理过程是如何出错(或成功)的,并使用人为因素的观点来考虑诊断过程中的系统相关背景因素。我们提供了详细的指导,用于对涉及诊断的案例进行 RCA,并就如何确定根本原因和促成因素以及选择适当的干预措施提供了建议。

相似文献

1
Root cause analysis of cases involving diagnosis.诊断相关案例的根本原因分析。
Diagnosis (Berl). 2024 Sep 3;11(4):353-368. doi: 10.1515/dx-2024-0102. eCollection 2024 Nov 1.
2
The RCA ReCAst: A Root Cause Analysis Simulation for the Interprofessional Clinical Learning Environment.RCA ReCAst:一种用于跨专业临床学习环境的根本原因分析模拟。
Acad Med. 2021 Jul 1;96(7):997-1001. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004064.
3
Using Fault Trees to Advance Understanding of Diagnostic Errors.利用故障树增进对诊断错误的理解。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2017 Nov;43(11):598-605. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2017.06.007. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
An evidence-based toolkit for the development of effective and sustainable root cause analysis system safety solutions.一个用于开发有效且可持续的根本原因分析系统安全解决方案的循证工具包。
J Healthc Risk Manag. 2013;33(2):11-20. doi: 10.1002/jhrm.21122.
6
Root cause analysis of critical events in neurosurgery, New South Wales.新南威尔士州神经外科危急事件的根本原因分析
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):626-30. doi: 10.1111/ans.12934. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
7
Assessment of Health Information Technology-Related Outpatient Diagnostic Delays in the US Veterans Affairs Health Care System: A Qualitative Study of Aggregated Root Cause Analysis Data.美国退伍军人事务医疗保健系统中与健康信息技术相关的门诊诊断延迟评估:基于聚合根本原因分析数据的定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e206752. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6752.
8
Team experiences of the root cause analysis process after a sentinel event: a qualitative case study.哨兵事件后根本原因分析过程中的团队经验:定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Nov 8;23(1):1224. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10178-3.
9
Does Root Cause Analysis Improve Patient Safety? A Systematic Review at the Department of Veterans Affairs.根本原因分析能否提高患者安全?美国退伍军人事务部的一项系统评价
Qual Manag Health Care. 2022;31(4):231-241. doi: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000344. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
10
Using Safety-II and resilient healthcare principles to learn from Never Events.运用安全 II 原则和弹性医疗保健原则,从“永不发生”事件中汲取教训。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 May 20;32(3):196-203. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa009.

引用本文的文献

1
Leveraging Kaizen with Process Mining in Healthcare Settings: A Conceptual Framework for Data-Driven Continuous Improvement.在医疗环境中结合改善法与流程挖掘:一个数据驱动的持续改进概念框架
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Apr 19;13(8):941. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13080941.