• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曼加鲁鲁一家私立医学院附属医院的 MBBS 实习医生开具精神药物的处方质量。

Prescription writing quality of psychotropic agents in MBBS interns in a private medical college hospital in Mangaluru.

机构信息

Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Department of Psychiatry, Kasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

出版信息

F1000Res. 2024 Dec 20;13:269. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.144712.1. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.12688/f1000research.144712.1
PMID:39238836
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11375400/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rational prescription writing is an important skill to master during internship. This Quality Improvement (QI) project aimed to understand the state of prescription writing among interns posted in the Department of Psychiatry, analyze the causes responsible for errors in prescription writing and bring about a change in the current practice.

METHODS

The MBBS interns are posted in the Department of Psychiatry for 15 days. During day 1 to day 5 of their posting, a pre intervention phase was conducted wherein prescriptions written by interns in the Department of Psychiatry were collected. The prescriptions were scored based on 14 criteria which were selected based on World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and Medical Council of India (MCI) ideal prescription format. During PDSA (Plan Do Study Act) Cycle 1, an educational handout was distributed to the interns containing the MCI ideal prescription format and WHO guidelines regarding prescription writing. The brochure was also verbally explained to the interns. From day 7 to day 15 of their posting, prescriptions written by the interns were collected. The prescriptions were scored using the same criteria.

RESULTS

During the pre intervention phase the mean total score of prescriptions was 9.54 ± 1.003. There was a significant improvement in the mean total score to 10.26 ± 0.746. There was a 7.54% improvement. There was also a significant improvement in several individual criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

The first PDSA cycle was successful in improving the quality of prescription writing among interns posted in the Department of Psychiatry. There is a need to implement more PDSA cycles to improve the quality still further.

摘要

背景

合理处方书写是实习期间需要掌握的一项重要技能。本质量改进(QI)项目旨在了解精神科实习医生的处方书写现状,分析导致处方书写错误的原因,并改变当前的实践。

方法

在精神科实习的医学生实习 15 天。在他们的实习的第 1 天到第 5 天进行干预前阶段,收集精神科实习医生开具的处方。根据世界卫生组织(WHO)指南和印度医学委员会(MCI)理想处方格式选择的 14 项标准对处方进行评分。在 PDSA(计划-执行-研究-行动)循环 1 中,向实习医生分发了一份教育手册,其中包含 MCI 理想处方格式和 WHO 关于处方书写的指南。还向实习医生口头解释了这本手册。在他们的实习的第 7 天到第 15 天,收集实习医生开具的处方。使用相同的标准对处方进行评分。

结果

在干预前阶段,处方的平均总分为 9.54±1.003。平均总分显著提高到 10.26±0.746。提高了 7.54%。几个单项标准也有显著提高。

结论

第一个 PDSA 循环成功地提高了精神科实习医生的处方书写质量。需要实施更多的 PDSA 循环来进一步提高质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b09/11784986/18036c652d65/f1000research-13-176005-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b09/11784986/1ba0bdd9d1bc/f1000research-13-176005-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b09/11784986/18036c652d65/f1000research-13-176005-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b09/11784986/1ba0bdd9d1bc/f1000research-13-176005-g0000.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9b09/11784986/18036c652d65/f1000research-13-176005-g0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Prescription writing quality of psychotropic agents in MBBS interns in a private medical college hospital in Mangaluru.曼加鲁鲁一家私立医学院附属医院的 MBBS 实习医生开具精神药物的处方质量。
F1000Res. 2024 Dec 20;13:269. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.144712.1. eCollection 2024.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
4
Interventions for patients and caregivers to improve knowledge of sickle cell disease and recognition of its related complications.针对患者及护理人员的干预措施,以提高对镰状细胞病的认识及其相关并发症的识别能力。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 6;10(10):CD011175. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011175.pub2.
5
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
6
Exercise interventions and patient beliefs for people with hip, knee or hip and knee osteoarthritis: a mixed methods review.髋、膝或髋膝骨关节炎患者的运动干预和患者信念:一项混合方法综述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 17;4(4):CD010842. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010842.pub2.
7
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
8
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
9
Designing and assessing the impact of a competency-based training program in transfusion medicine among MBBS interns.设计并评估一项针对医学学士实习生的输血医学能力本位培训计划的影响。
Transfus Clin Biol. 2025 Aug;32(3):305-308. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2025.06.003. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
10
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训

本文引用的文献

1
Usage Pattern of Fixed-dose Combinations at ICMR Network of Rational Use of Medicine Centres across India: Recommendations for Policymakers and Prescribers.印度医学研究委员会合理用药中心网络中固定剂量复方制剂的使用模式:为政策制定者和处方者提供建议。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2023 Feb;71(2):11-12. doi: 10.5005/japi-11001-0175.
2
Implementation and assessment of a module to enhance prescribing competency in undergraduate medical students.一个提高本科医学生处方能力模块的实施与评估
Med J Armed Forces India. 2021 Feb;77(Suppl 1):S122-S128. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2020.12.025. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
Time to teach basic and regulatory aspects of art of prescription writing for better doctor-patient safety and keeping communication accessible and straight.
是时候教授基本和监管方面的处方书写艺术了,以提高医患安全性,并保持沟通的可及性和直接性。
Daru. 2020 Jun;28(1):25-32. doi: 10.1007/s40199-018-00236-1. Epub 2019 Jan 3.
4
Impact of patient-based teaching in improving prescription writing skills of II MBBS students.基于患者的教学对提高II年级医学学士学生处方书写技能的影响。
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2016 Jul-Sep;6(3):174-7. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.186954.
5
Assessment of current prescribing practices using World Health Organization core drug use and complementary indicators in selected rural community pharmacies in Southern India.利用世界卫生组织核心药物使用及补充指标对印度南部部分农村社区药房当前的处方实践进行评估。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016 Jul 19;10:1. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0074-6. eCollection 2017.
6
Insight Into Quality of Prescription Writing - An Instituitional Study.处方书写质量洞察——一项机构研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 Mar;10(3):ZC61-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18011.7472. Epub 2016 Mar 1.
7
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
Medication Errors in the Southeast Asian Countries: A Systematic Review.东南亚国家的用药错误:一项系统评价。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 4;10(9):e0136545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136545. eCollection 2015.
9
Analysis of Out Door Patients' Prescriptions According to World Health Organization (WHO) Prescribing Indicators Among Private Hospitals in Western India.根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的处方指标对印度西部私立医院门诊患者处方的分析。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2015 Mar;9(3):FC01-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2015/12724.5632. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
10
Prescribing pattern of interns in a primary health center in India.印度一家初级卫生中心实习生的处方模式。
J Basic Clin Pharm. 2014 Mar;5(2):40-3. doi: 10.4103/0976-0105.134980.