Barbosa Thiago Moreth da Silva, Ferraz Ítalo Carvalho
Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital Getúlio Vargas, Recife, PE, Brasil.
Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2024 May 19;59(4):e504-e509. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1785665. eCollection 2024 Aug.
The most common compressive neuropathy of the upper limbs is carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Historically, there has been a tendency to apply immobilization in the postoperative period, a practice that has decreased in recent years. This review aims to assess whether there is scientific evidence to justify the use of immobilization in the postoperative care of CTS decompression. The following databases were used: Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde (BVS), PubMed National Library of Medicine - (NLM), Cochrane Library, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and EMBASE. The following inclusion criteria were used: 1) discussion of the postoperative period of median nerve decompression surgery in CTS; 2) comparison of results after surgical decompression in CTS between wrist immobilization or local dressing; 3) all languages, regardless of the year of publication; and 4) all types of publications. The following exclusion criteria were used: 1) studies that did not evaluate the postoperative period of CTS decompression; 2) lack of evaluation of the outcome related to the application of local dressing or some form of wrist immobilization after the surgical decompression procedure; and 3) repeated publications. The literature search resulted in 336 relevant publications. In the end, 18 publications were chosen. Systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and cross-sectional studies were found. Due to the scarcity of evidence supporting the use of immobilization coupled with the higher costs associated with the practice, it has become less and less frequent in recent decades. In the literature, two approaches to postoperative care for CTS decompression are described: immobilization or just local dressing. According to the available scientific evidence, it is worth evaluating which one is better.
上肢最常见的压迫性神经病变是腕管综合征(CTS)。从历史上看,术后有应用固定疗法的倾向,近年来这种做法有所减少。本综述旨在评估是否有科学证据证明在CTS减压术后护理中使用固定疗法是合理的。
虚拟健康图书馆(BVS)、美国国立医学图书馆的PubMed、考克兰图书馆、科学电子图书馆在线(SciELO)和EMBASE。使用了以下纳入标准:1)讨论CTS正中神经减压手术的术后阶段;2)比较CTS手术减压后腕部固定或局部敷料的结果;3)所有语言,无论出版年份;4)所有类型的出版物。使用了以下排除标准:1)未评估CTS减压术后阶段的研究;2)手术减压后未评估与局部敷料应用或某种形式的腕部固定相关的结果;3)重复发表的文献。
文献检索得到336篇相关出版物。最终,选择了18篇出版物。发现了系统评价、随机临床试验和横断面研究。
由于支持使用固定疗法的证据稀缺,且该做法成本较高,近几十年来其使用频率越来越低。
文献中描述了CTS减压术后护理的两种方法:固定或仅局部敷料。根据现有科学证据,值得评估哪种方法更好。