Donati Danilo, Boccolari Paolo, Tedeschi Roberto
Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Unit, Policlinico di Modena, 41122 Modena, Italy.
Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41121 Modena, Italy.
Life (Basel). 2024 Oct 11;14(10):1286. doi: 10.3390/life14101286.
Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) is a common condition characterized by compression of the median nerve, leading to pain, numbness, and hand dysfunction. Both manual therapy and surgical decompression are widely used interventions, but their comparative effectiveness remains uncertain.
A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to compare the short- and long-term efficacy of manual therapy versus surgery for CTS. Studies were selected based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that met the inclusion criteria, focusing on outcomes such as pain intensity, hand function, symptom severity, and quality of life. Data were extracted and analyzed by using standardized tools to assess treatment effects.
Five RCTs with a total of 533 participants were included. Manual therapy was more effective for short-term pain relief, with significant improvements at 1 and 3 months compared with surgery. However, at 6 to 12 months, surgical intervention provided greater improvements in hand function and symptom severity. Quality-of-life improvements were similar in both groups. Risk of bias was moderate to low across the studies, with limitations in blinding due to the nature of the interventions.
Manual therapy offers effective short-term relief for CTS, making it a viable option for patients with mild to moderate symptoms. Surgery provides more durable, long-term outcomes, particularly for severe cases. The choice of treatment should be individualized, considering patient preferences and symptom severity.
腕管综合征(CTS)是一种常见病症,其特征为正中神经受压,导致疼痛、麻木和手部功能障碍。手法治疗和手术减压都是广泛应用的干预措施,但它们的相对疗效仍不确定。
进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以比较手法治疗与手术治疗CTS的短期和长期疗效。根据符合纳入标准的随机对照试验(RCT)选择研究,重点关注疼痛强度、手部功能、症状严重程度和生活质量等结果。使用标准化工具提取和分析数据,以评估治疗效果。
纳入了5项RCT,共533名参与者。手法治疗在短期疼痛缓解方面更有效,与手术相比,在1个月和3个月时疼痛有显著改善。然而,在6至12个月时,手术干预在手部功能和症状严重程度方面有更大改善。两组在生活质量改善方面相似。各研究的偏倚风险为中到低,由于干预措施的性质,在盲法方面存在局限性。
手法治疗可为CTS提供有效的短期缓解,使其成为轻至中度症状患者的可行选择。手术可提供更持久的长期疗效,特别是对于严重病例。治疗选择应个体化,考虑患者偏好和症状严重程度。