Suppr超能文献

报告社区参与自闭症研究:来自《自闭症》杂志的发现

Reporting community involvement in autism research: Findings from the journal Autism.

作者信息

Tan Diana Weiting, Crane Laura, Haar Tori, Heyworth Melanie, Poulsen Rebecca, Pellicano Elizabeth

机构信息

Macquarie School of Education, Macquarie University, Australia.

School of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Autism. 2025 Feb;29(2):490-503. doi: 10.1177/13623613241275263. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

Abstract

There has been a growing push for the Autistic and autism communities to be more actively involved in autism research. From January 2021, the journal made it a rule for authors to report whether they involved community members in their work; and if they did, how they had done so. In this study, we wanted to see how this new rule has changed things. Our team of Autistic and non-autistic researchers read all 283 articles published in in 2019, about 2 years before the rule was in place, and in 2022, about 1 year after. We recorded what each article was about and how the community was involved. We found there was an increase in how often articles talked about community involvement - from about 10% before the rule to over 50% after. Most of these studies, however, only involved community members giving advice, with the researchers making most decisions about the research. This was especially true for applied research (like wellbeing) rather than basic science (like causes of autism). Also, some of these articles were unclear or did not give enough information for us to understand how the community was involved. This tells us that while it is promising that more community involvement is reported, researchers need to describe this involvement more clearly. It is also important for community members to have a bigger say in research by sharing power with the researchers or even leading the research themselves.

摘要

越来越多的人推动自闭症患者群体更积极地参与自闭症研究。从2021年1月起,该期刊规定作者要报告他们是否在研究工作中纳入了社区成员;如果纳入了,是如何做到的。在这项研究中,我们想看看这条新规定带来了哪些变化。我们由自闭症患者和非自闭症患者组成的研究团队阅读了2019年发表的所有283篇文章,这大约是该规定实施前两年;以及2022年发表的文章,这大约是该规定实施后一年。我们记录了每篇文章的主题以及社区成员是如何参与的。我们发现,文章提及社区参与的频率有所增加——从规定实施前的约10%增至实施后的50%以上。然而,这些研究大多只涉及让社区成员提供建议,研究的大多数决策仍由研究人员做出。对于应用研究(如幸福感研究)而言尤其如此,而非基础科学研究(如自闭症病因研究)。此外,其中一些文章表述不清或没有提供足够信息让我们了解社区成员是如何参与的。这告诉我们,虽然报告显示社区参与度有所提高是件好事,但研究人员需要更清晰地描述这种参与情况。同样重要的是,社区成员要通过与研究人员分享权力甚至亲自主导研究,在研究中拥有更大的话语权。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de74/11816470/cf311fa9580e/10.1177_13623613241275263-fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验