Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan, 1500 E. Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Int Urogynecol J. 2024 Oct;35(10):1983-1991. doi: 10.1007/s00192-024-05908-y. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
The objective was to assess trends in hysterectomy routes by patients who are likely and unlikely candidates for a vaginal approach.
We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent vaginal, abdominal, or laparoscopic/robotics-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy between 2017 and 2020 using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients undergoing hysterectomy for a primary diagnosis of benign uterine pathology, dysplasia, abnormal uterine bleeding, or pelvic floor disorders were eligible for inclusion. Patients who were parous, had no history of pelvic or abdominal surgery, and had a uterine weight ≤ 280 g on pathology were considered likely candidates for vaginal hysterectomy based on an algorithm developed to guide the surgical approach. Average annual changes in the proportion of likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates and route of hysterectomy were assessed using logistic regression.
Of the 77,829 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 13,738 (17.6%) were likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates. Among likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates, the rate of vaginal hysterectomy was 34.5%, whereas among unlikely vaginal hysterectomy candidates, it was 14.1%. The overall vaginal hysterectomy rate decreased -1.2%/year (p < 0.01). This decreasing trend was nearly twice as rapid among likely vaginal hysterectomy candidates (-1.9%/year, p < .01) compared with unlikely vaginal hysterectomy candidates (-1.1%/year, P < 0.01); the difference in trends was statistically significant (p < 0.01).
The rate of vaginal hysterectomy performed for eligible indications decreased between 2017 and 2020 in a national surgical registry. This negative trend was more pronounced among patients who were likely candidates for vaginal hysterectomy based on favorable parity, surgical history, and uterine weight.
目的是评估可能和不太可能采用阴道入路的患者行子宫切除术的途径趋势。
我们使用国家手术质量改进计划数据库,对 2017 年至 2020 年间接受阴道、腹部或腹腔镜/机器人辅助腹腔镜子宫切除术的患者进行了回顾性队列研究。符合纳入标准的患者包括因良性子宫病理学、发育不良、异常子宫出血或盆底疾病而接受子宫切除术的原发性诊断、经产妇、无盆腔或腹部手术史以及病理上子宫重量≤280g 的患者。基于指导手术方法的算法,将这些患者视为阴道子宫切除术的可能候选者。使用逻辑回归评估可能的阴道子宫切除术候选者和子宫切除术途径的比例的年平均变化。
在符合纳入标准的 77829 名患者中,有 13738 名(17.6%)是可能的阴道子宫切除术候选者。在可能的阴道子宫切除术候选者中,阴道子宫切除术的比例为 34.5%,而在不太可能的阴道子宫切除术候选者中,该比例为 14.1%。阴道子宫切除术的总体比例每年下降-1.2%(p<0.01)。在可能的阴道子宫切除术候选者中,这一下降趋势几乎是不太可能的阴道子宫切除术候选者的两倍(-1.9%/年,p<0.01);趋势差异具有统计学意义(p<0.01)。
在全国手术登记处,2017 年至 2020 年间,为符合条件的适应症而进行的阴道子宫切除术的比例下降。对于那些根据良好的生育史、手术史和子宫重量更有可能进行阴道子宫切除术的患者,这种负面趋势更为明显。