• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MR-SPLIT:一种在单样本 Mendelian 随机化研究中解决选择偏倚和弱工具变量偏倚的新方法。

MR-SPLIT: A novel method to address selection and weak instrument bias in one-sample Mendelian randomization studies.

机构信息

Department of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

Department of Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Genet. 2024 Sep 6;20(9):e1011391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011391. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pgen.1011391
PMID:39241053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11410202/
Abstract

Mendelian Randomization (MR) is a widely embraced approach to assess causality in epidemiological studies. Two-stage least squares (2SLS) method is a predominant technique in MR analysis. However, it can lead to biased estimates when instrumental variables (IVs) are weak. Moreover, the issue of the winner's curse could emerge when utilizing the same dataset for both IV selection and causal effect estimation, leading to biased estimates of causal effects and high false positives. Focusing on one-sample MR analysis, this paper introduces a novel method termed Mendelian Randomization with adaptive Sample-sPLitting with cross-fitting InstrumenTs (MR-SPLIT), designed to address bias issues due to IV selection and weak IVs, under the 2SLS IV regression framework. We show that the MR-SPLIT estimator is more efficient than its counterpart cross-fitting MR (CFMR) estimator. Additionally, we introduce a multiple sample-splitting technique to enhance the robustness of the method. We conduct extensive simulation studies to compare the performance of our method with its counterparts. The results underscored its superiority in bias reduction, effective type I error control, and increased power. We further demonstrate its utility through the application of a real-world dataset. Our study underscores the importance of addressing bias issues due to IV selection and weak IVs in one-sample MR analyses and provides a robust solution to the challenge.

摘要

孟德尔随机化(MR)是一种广泛应用于评估流行病学研究中因果关系的方法。两阶段最小二乘法(2SLS)是 MR 分析中的主要技术。然而,当工具变量(IVs)较弱时,它可能会导致有偏差的估计。此外,当同一数据集同时用于 IV 选择和因果效应估计时,可能会出现赢家诅咒的问题,导致因果效应的估计值有偏差和高假阳性率。本文专注于单样本 MR 分析,提出了一种新的方法,称为基于自适应样本分割与交叉拟合工具的孟德尔随机化(MR-SPLIT),旨在解决 2SLS IV 回归框架下由于 IV 选择和弱 IV 引起的偏差问题。我们表明,MR-SPLIT 估计量比其对应的交叉拟合 MR(CFMR)估计量更有效。此外,我们引入了一种多样本分割技术来增强方法的稳健性。我们进行了广泛的模拟研究,比较了我们的方法与其他方法的性能。结果强调了它在减少偏差、有效控制Ⅰ型错误和提高功效方面的优越性。我们通过应用真实数据集进一步证明了它的实用性。我们的研究强调了在单样本 MR 分析中解决由于 IV 选择和弱 IV 引起的偏差问题的重要性,并为这一挑战提供了一个稳健的解决方案。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/7ef06afd8895/pgen.1011391.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/bf396d58a811/pgen.1011391.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/9cf33d17b3ac/pgen.1011391.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/7ea15d3fc6cc/pgen.1011391.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/cb7797d3b117/pgen.1011391.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/ba170e76d0a7/pgen.1011391.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/a227361feafd/pgen.1011391.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/b0a038b61403/pgen.1011391.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/7ef06afd8895/pgen.1011391.g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/bf396d58a811/pgen.1011391.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/9cf33d17b3ac/pgen.1011391.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/7ea15d3fc6cc/pgen.1011391.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/cb7797d3b117/pgen.1011391.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/ba170e76d0a7/pgen.1011391.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/a227361feafd/pgen.1011391.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/b0a038b61403/pgen.1011391.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/387b/11410202/7ef06afd8895/pgen.1011391.g008.jpg

相似文献

1
MR-SPLIT: A novel method to address selection and weak instrument bias in one-sample Mendelian randomization studies.MR-SPLIT:一种在单样本 Mendelian 随机化研究中解决选择偏倚和弱工具变量偏倚的新方法。
PLoS Genet. 2024 Sep 6;20(9):e1011391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011391. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Approximation of bias and mean-squared error in two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses.两样本孟德尔随机化分析中偏差和均方误差的逼近。
Biometrics. 2020 Jun;76(2):369-379. doi: 10.1111/biom.13169. Epub 2019 Dec 4.
3
Cross-fitted instrument: A blueprint for one-sample Mendelian randomization.交叉拟合工具:单一样本 Mendelian 随机化的蓝图。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Aug 29;18(8):e1010268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010268. eCollection 2022 Aug.
4
Mendelian randomization mixed-scale treatment effect robust identification and estimation for causal inference.孟德尔随机化混合尺度处理效应稳健识别与因果推断估计。
Biometrics. 2023 Sep;79(3):2208-2219. doi: 10.1111/biom.13735. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
5
Bias and mean squared error in Mendelian randomization with invalid instrumental variables.基于无效工具变量的孟德尔随机化中的偏差和均方误差。
Genet Epidemiol. 2024 Feb;48(1):27-41. doi: 10.1002/gepi.22541. Epub 2023 Nov 16.
6
Weak-instrument robust tests in two-sample summary-data Mendelian randomization.两样本汇总数据孟德尔随机化中的弱工具变量稳健检验
Biometrics. 2022 Dec;78(4):1699-1713. doi: 10.1111/biom.13524. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
7
The many weak instruments problem and Mendelian randomization.多弱工具变量问题与孟德尔随机化
Stat Med. 2015 Feb 10;34(3):454-68. doi: 10.1002/sim.6358. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
8
Impact of nonrandom selection mechanisms on the causal effect estimation for two-sample Mendelian randomization methods.两样本 Mendelian 随机化方法中,非随机选择机制对因果效应估计的影响。
PLoS Genet. 2022 Mar 17;18(3):e1010107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010107. eCollection 2022 Mar.
9
MRBEE: A bias-corrected multivariable Mendelian randomization method.MRBEE:一种纠偏的多变量孟德尔随机化方法。
HGG Adv. 2024 Jul 18;5(3):100290. doi: 10.1016/j.xhgg.2024.100290. Epub 2024 Apr 6.
10
A novel penalized inverse-variance weighted estimator for Mendelian randomization with applications to COVID-19 outcomes.一种新的基于惩罚逆方差加权的孟德尔随机化估计器及其在 COVID-19 结局研究中的应用。
Biometrics. 2023 Sep;79(3):2184-2195. doi: 10.1111/biom.13732. Epub 2022 Sep 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Multi-omics analysis reveals glutathione metabolism-related immune suppression and constructs a prognostic model in lung adenocarcinoma.多组学分析揭示了与谷胱甘肽代谢相关的免疫抑制作用,并构建了肺腺癌的预后模型。
Front Immunol. 2025 Jul 2;16:1608407. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1608407. eCollection 2025.
2
Methylation risk score of C-reactive protein associates sleep health with related health outcomes.C反应蛋白的甲基化风险评分将睡眠健康与相关健康结果联系起来。
Commun Biol. 2025 May 28;8(1):821. doi: 10.1038/s42003-025-08226-1.
3
Genetic predictors of traits in elderly subjects: risk of survival bias and reverse causation.

本文引用的文献

1
An empirical investigation into the impact of winner's curse on estimates from Mendelian randomization.孟德尔随机化中赢家诅咒对估计值影响的实证研究
Int J Epidemiol. 2023 Aug 2;52(4):1209-1219. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac233.
2
Cross-fitted instrument: A blueprint for one-sample Mendelian randomization.交叉拟合工具:单一样本 Mendelian 随机化的蓝图。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Aug 29;18(8):e1010268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010268. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Likelihood-based Mendelian randomization analysis with automated instrument selection and horizontal pleiotropic modeling.
老年受试者性状的遗传预测因素:生存偏差和反向因果关系的风险。
Eur Heart J. 2024 Jun 28;45(24):2155-2157. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehae295.
基于似然性的孟德尔随机化分析,具备自动工具选择和水平多效性建模。
Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 4;8(9):eabl5744. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abl5744. Epub 2022 Mar 2.
4
Cauchy combination test: a powerful test with analytic -value calculation under arbitrary dependency structures.柯西组合检验:一种在任意相依结构下具有解析值计算功能的强大检验。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2020;115(529):393-402. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1554485. Epub 2019 Apr 25.
5
Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023.孟德尔随机化研究实施指南:2023年夏季更新版
Wellcome Open Res. 2023 Aug 4;4:186. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15555.3. eCollection 2019.
6
A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study supports causal effects of kidney function on blood pressure.一项双向孟德尔随机化研究支持肾功能对血压的因果影响。
Kidney Int. 2020 Sep;98(3):708-716. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2020.04.044. Epub 2020 May 23.
7
A robust and efficient method for Mendelian randomization with hundreds of genetic variants.一种用于数百种遗传变异的孟德尔随机化的强大而高效的方法。
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 17;11(1):376. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-14156-4.
8
Mendelian randomization analysis using mixture models for robust and efficient estimation of causal effects.基于混合模型的孟德尔随机化分析,用于稳健且高效地估计因果效应。
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 26;10(1):1941. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09432-2.
9
Inflammation and Apparent Treatment-Resistant Hypertension in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.慢性肾脏病患者的炎症与貌似治疗抵抗性高血压
Hypertension. 2019 Apr;73(4):785-793. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12358.
10
Evaluating the potential role of pleiotropy in Mendelian randomization studies.评估多效性在孟德尔随机化研究中的潜在作用。
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Aug 1;27(R2):R195-R208. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddy163.