Department of Sociology and Criminal Justice, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Center for Family and Demographic Research and Department of Sociology, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 6;19(9):e0308925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0308925. eCollection 2024.
This study examined differences in alcohol use by sexual and gender identities during the COVID-19 pandemic, and assessed whether variation between groups was explained by pandemic-related stressors and minority stress. Data from 2,429 partnered adults in the National Couples' Health and Time Use Study (n = 3,593) collected from September 2020 to April 2021 were used to model drinking patterns (frequency, amount, and drinking to cope) by sexual and gender identities, COVID-19 stress and disruption, microaggressions, and supportive climate. Regression models indicated differences in drinking by gender and sexual identities, even controlling for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Gay, lesbian, and bisexual people had higher odds of drinking to cope with the pandemic than did heterosexual people, and cisgender men had higher odds than did cisgender women. Gay and lesbian people drank more regularly than did heterosexual people, as did cisgender men in relation to cisgender women. Exclusively bisexual people drank significantly more drinks than exclusively heterosexual people, and cisgender men drank significantly more drinks than did cisgender women and those who identified as trans/another gender identity. COVID-19 stress and minority stress were associated with greater alcohol consumption, but they did not account for these differentials. Moving forward, researchers will need to continuously assess these associations, as sources of discrimination and stress will persist beyond the pandemic. Although LGBTQ+ people have disproportionate sources of stress, they varied in how they used alcohol to cope. Potential sources of resilience among sexual and gender diverse individuals should be explored.
本研究考察了 COVID-19 大流行期间不同性别认同和性取向的个体在饮酒方面的差异,并评估了群体间的差异是否可以用与大流行相关的压力源和少数群体压力来解释。该研究的数据来自于 2020 年 9 月至 2021 年 4 月期间进行的全国伴侣健康和时间使用研究(National Couples' Health and Time Use Study)中的 2429 对伴侣成年人(n = 3593),用于通过性和性别认同、COVID-19 压力和干扰、微侵犯和支持性气候来构建饮酒模式(频率、数量和饮酒应对)。回归模型表明,即使控制了人口统计学和社会经济因素,性别和性身份的差异也会影响饮酒。与异性恋者相比,同性恋、双性恋和跨性别者更有可能通过饮酒来应对疫情,而顺性别男性比顺性别女性更有可能通过饮酒来应对疫情。与异性恋者相比,同性恋和双性恋者的饮酒更为规律,顺性别男性的饮酒也比顺性别女性更为规律。仅为双性恋者的人比仅为异性恋者的人喝的酒更多,顺性别男性比顺性别女性和跨性别/另一种性别认同者喝的酒更多。COVID-19 压力和少数群体压力与饮酒量增加有关,但它们并不能解释这些差异。未来,研究人员需要不断评估这些关联,因为歧视和压力的来源将持续存在,而不仅仅是在疫情期间。尽管 LGBTQ+人群面临不成比例的压力源,但他们在如何用酒精来应对方面存在差异。应该探索性和性别多样化个体的潜在适应来源。