Hu Zhaoxin, Wu Zeyan, Luo Weiqun, Liu Shaohua, Tu Chun
Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China; Pingguo Guangxi, Karst Ecosystem, National Observation and Research Station/Pingguo Baise, Karst Ecosystem, Guangxi Observation and Research Station, Pingguo 531406, China; Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Natural Resources & Guangxi/International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Guilin 541004, China.
Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Guilin 541004, China; Pingguo Guangxi, Karst Ecosystem, National Observation and Research Station/Pingguo Baise, Karst Ecosystem, Guangxi Observation and Research Station, Pingguo 531406, China; Key Laboratory of Karst Dynamics, Ministry of Natural Resources & Guangxi/International Research Centre on Karst under the Auspices of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Guilin 541004, China.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Nov 25;953:176049. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176049. Epub 2024 Sep 4.
Soil in karst areas commonly exhibits characteristics of heavy metal enrichment. Accurate identification of soil heavy metal distribution, risks, and sources are crucial for preventing soil heavy metal pollution in karst areas. In this study, 2467 topsoil samples (0-20 cm) and 620 subsoil samples (150-200 cm) were collected using a grid-based sampling method in Tianyang County. Statistics, geo-statistics, correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and the absolute principal component-multiple linear regression model were utilized to analyze the content, spatial distribution and sources of heavy metals. The geo-accumulation index and the potential ecological risk index were employed to assess the ecological risks of heavy metals in the topsoil, with the subsoil content as baseline. The results showed that the study area's soil exhibited high heavy metal content, significantly exceeding Chinese background values. The content of heavy metals in the karst area's soil was notably higher than that in the non-karst area. The fitted semi-variogram models and the spatial distribution map revealed that the heavy metals' content was generally dominated by the geological background. As, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, and Zn displayed low levels of pollution in the topsoil and posed low ecological risk, with over 90 % of samples classified as unpolluted and low risk. Cd exhibited high levels of pollution and ecological risks, with 52.28 % of samples classified as polluted and 60.81 % classified as moderate to high risk. For Hg, despite only 6.94 % of samples showing polluted, the ecological risks were not negligible, with 40.65 % of samples in moderate to high risk. Natural source and anthropogenic source contribute to the heavy metals on average by 81.49 % and 18.51 %, respectively. This study provides a reference for the risk assessment of soil heavy metals, and its findings offer valuable scientific insights for the prevention of heavy metal pollution in the study area.
喀斯特地区土壤普遍呈现重金属富集特征。准确识别土壤重金属分布、风险及来源对于防治喀斯特地区土壤重金属污染至关重要。本研究采用网格采样法在田阳县采集了2467个表层土壤样本(0 - 20厘米)和620个下层土壤样本(150 - 200厘米)。运用统计分析、地统计学、相关性分析、主成分分析以及绝对主成分 - 多元线性回归模型,对重金属的含量、空间分布及来源进行分析。以底层土壤含量为基线,采用地累积指数和潜在生态风险指数评估表层土壤中重金属的生态风险。结果表明,研究区土壤重金属含量较高,显著超过中国背景值。喀斯特地区土壤重金属含量明显高于非喀斯特地区。拟合的半变异函数模型和空间分布图显示,重金属含量总体受地质背景主导。砷、铬、铜、汞、镍、铅和锌在表层土壤中污染程度较低,生态风险较低,超过90% 的样本被归类为未污染和低风险。镉污染程度高且生态风险高,52.28% 的样本被归类为污染,60.81% 被归类为中高风险。对于汞,尽管只有6.94% 的样本显示污染,但生态风险不可忽视,40.65% 的样本处于中高风险。自然源和人为源对重金属的平均贡献率分别为81.49% 和18.51%。本研究为土壤重金属风险评估提供了参考,其结果为研究区重金属污染防治提供了有价值的科学依据。