Brazeal Thomas, Kaye Leanne, Vuong Vy, Le Jade, Peris Zachary, Barrett Meredith A
Desert Oasis Healthcare, Palm Springs, California, United States.
ResMed Science Center, San Diego, California, United States.
Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. 2024 Sep 27;11(5):515-523. doi: 10.15326/jcopdf.2024.0532.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a progressive lung disease that adds a significant economic burden to the health care system in the United States. Digital platforms integrated into clinical workflows have demonstrated success in improving patient outcomes in COPD, but few studies have explored the impact of an integrated digital and clinical approach on drivers of direct health care costs (COPD-related prescriptions, emergency department [ED] visits, and hospitalizations) in a real-world setting.
We conducted a 6-month retrospective matched control analysis to assess the impact of a digital quality improvement (QI) program delivered by clinical pharmacists on health care resource utilization among people living with COPD.
Compared to matched controls at 6 months, participants in the digital QI program had a 66.7% relative reduction in COPD-related ED visits and hospitalizations (0.04±0.19 versus 0.12±0.44, =0.044), as well as a 47% reduction in all-cause ED visits and hospitalizations (0.25±0.63 versus 0.47±1.09, =0.059). Participants in the digital QI program also had higher rates of COPD-related prescription fills for antibiotics (0.43±0.93 versus 0.35±0.74, =0.881) and oral corticosteroids (0.56±1.02 versus 0.36±0.91, =0.045), as well as a greater number of COPD-related nonacute urgent care visits compared to matched controls (0.3±0.63 versus 0.14±0.44, =0.027).
Digital health platforms integrated into a virtual clinical pharmacist workflow can help reduce costly COPD-related ED visits and hospitalizations, and shift utilization to less acute care. Care models integrating digital platforms may also offer a scalable approach to managing COPD and should be explored in different clinical settings.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)是一种进行性肺部疾病,给美国医疗保健系统带来了巨大的经济负担。融入临床工作流程的数字平台已证明在改善COPD患者的治疗效果方面取得了成功,但很少有研究探讨在实际环境中综合数字与临床方法对直接医疗费用驱动因素(COPD相关处方、急诊科[ED]就诊和住院)的影响。
我们进行了一项为期6个月的回顾性匹配对照分析,以评估临床药师提供的数字质量改进(QI)计划对COPD患者医疗资源利用的影响。
与6个月时的匹配对照组相比,数字QI计划的参与者COPD相关的ED就诊和住院次数相对减少了66.7%(0.04±0.19对0.12±0.44,P = 0.044),全因ED就诊和住院次数减少了47%(0.25±0.63对0.47±1.09,P = 0.059)。数字QI计划的参与者COPD相关抗生素处方配药率也更高(0.43±0.93对0.35±0.74,P = 0.881)和口服糖皮质激素处方配药率更高(0.56±1.02对0.36±0.91,P = 0.045),与匹配对照组相比,COPD相关的非急性紧急护理就诊次数也更多(0.3±0.63对0.14±0.44,P = 0.027)。
融入虚拟临床药师工作流程的数字健康平台有助于减少与COPD相关的昂贵的ED就诊和住院次数,并将医疗利用转向不太紧急的护理。整合数字平台的护理模式也可能提供一种可扩展的COPD管理方法,应在不同临床环境中进行探索。