• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高危农村手术患者和选择性结直肠癌手术机会不足:为美国农村提供多层次干预的见解。

High-risk rural surgical patients and poor access to elective colorectal cancer surgery: insight for multilevel intervention for rural America.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Creighton University School of Medicine, Omaha, NE, United States; Department of Surgery, Catholic Health Initiatives Health, Omaha, NE, United States.

Department of Surgery, Catholic Health Initiatives Health, Omaha, NE, United States.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Nov;28(11):1883-1889. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Sep 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.gassur.2024.08.011
PMID:39242216
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of death in rural America. Rural populations are large and heterogeneous, yet patient-related drivers of inequities in CRC access are understudied. This study aimed to identify vulnerable rural populations at lower odds of undergoing elective CRC surgery.

METHODS

Evaluation of the Policy Map and United States Census Bureau identified factors associated with poor surgical access in the most populous states (by total rural population). To assess whether these identified factors were associated with reduced access to elective CRC surgery, the 2007 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample was used to evaluate 69,212 hospitalizations of rural patients undergoing CRC surgery. Rural was defined as counties with a population of <250,000. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed predictors of elective CRC surgery. Patient- and hospital-level factor interactions were specified a priori.

RESULTS

More than 72% of hospitalizations of rural patients were elective. Multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that older age, multimorbidity, Black race, Latino-Hispanic ethnicity, Medicaid insurance, and rural hospitals predicted lower odds of elective CRC surgery. On interaction analyses, high-risk patients were less likely to undergo elective CRC surgery in urban facilities relative to rural.

CONCLUSION

In this large study of rural dwellers, ethnoracial minorities, elders, and Medicaid beneficiaries had profoundly less access to elective CRC surgery, especially when care was received in urban settings. Future studies should focus on exploring actionable social drivers of health in these rural populations. Findings underscore the need for multilevel interventions to enhance rural access to equitable and quality surgical cancer care.

摘要

背景

结直肠癌(CRC)是美国农村地区的主要死亡原因。农村人口众多且异质,但患者相关因素导致 CRC 治疗机会不平等的研究却很少。本研究旨在确定接受择期 CRC 手术可能性较低的脆弱农村人群。

方法

评估政策地图和美国人口普查局确定了人口最多的州(按农村总人口计算)中与手术机会不良相关的因素。为了评估这些确定的因素是否与接受择期 CRC 手术的机会减少有关,使用 2007 年至 2020 年国家住院患者样本评估了 69212 例农村 CRC 手术患者的住院情况。农村地区的定义为人口少于 25 万的县。多变量逻辑回归模型评估了择期 CRC 手术的预测因素。事先规定了患者和医院水平因素的相互作用。

结果

超过 72%的农村患者的住院治疗为择期。多变量回归分析表明,年龄较大、合并症较多、黑人、拉丁裔/西班牙裔、医疗补助保险和农村医院与择期 CRC 手术的可能性较低相关。在交互分析中,与农村设施相比,高危患者在城市设施中接受择期 CRC 手术的可能性较低。

结论

在这项针对农村居民的大型研究中,少数民族、老年人和医疗补助受益人的 CRC 手术机会明显较少,尤其是在城市医疗机构接受治疗时。未来的研究应重点探讨这些农村人群中可采取行动的健康社会驱动因素。研究结果强调需要采取多层次干预措施,以增强农村地区获得公平和高质量的手术癌症护理的机会。

相似文献

1
High-risk rural surgical patients and poor access to elective colorectal cancer surgery: insight for multilevel intervention for rural America.高危农村手术患者和选择性结直肠癌手术机会不足:为美国农村提供多层次干预的见解。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Nov;28(11):1883-1889. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.08.011. Epub 2024 Sep 6.
2
Minorities are less likely to receive autologous blood transfusion for major elective orthopaedic surgery.少数族裔在接受大型择期骨科手术时接受自体输血的可能性较小。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov;472(11):3559-66. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3793-5. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
3
Geographic and population-level disparities in colorectal cancer testing: A multilevel analysis of Medicaid and commercial claims data.地理和人口水平的结直肠癌检测差异:医疗补助和商业索赔数据的多层次分析。
Prev Med. 2017 Aug;101:44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.05.001. Epub 2017 May 13.
4
National disparities in laparoscopic colorectal procedures for colon cancer.腹腔镜结直肠手术治疗结肠癌的全国差异。
Surg Endosc. 2014 Jan;28(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3160-8. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
5
Factors Associated With Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Emergency Settings.与急症中结直肠癌微创外科手术相关的因素。
J Surg Res. 2019 Nov;243:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.089. Epub 2019 May 31.
6
Disparities in access to deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson disease: interaction between African American race and Medicaid use.帕金森病患者接受深部脑刺激手术机会的差异:非裔美国人种族与医疗补助计划使用之间的相互作用。
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Mar;71(3):291-9. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.5798.
7
Persistent Disparities in Access to Elective Colorectal Cancer Surgery After Medicaid Expansion Under the Affordable Care Act: A Multistate Evaluation.平价医疗法案实施后,医疗补助扩大覆盖范围后,择期结直肠癌手术机会仍存在持续差异:一项多州评估。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2023 Sep 1;66(9):1234-1244. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002560. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
8
Social determinants of access to minimally invasive hysterectomy: reevaluating the relationship between race and route of hysterectomy for benign disease.获得微创子宫切除术的社会决定因素:重新评估种族与良性疾病子宫切除途径之间的关系。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;217(5):572.e1-572.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.07.036. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
9
National racial/ethnic and geographic disparities in experiences with health care among adult Medicaid beneficiaries.美国成年医疗补助受益人群在医疗保健方面的经历存在国家种族/民族和地域差异。
Health Serv Res. 2019 Feb;54 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):287-296. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13106. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
10
Rural-Urban Differences in In-Hospital Mortality Among Admissions for End-Stage Liver Disease in the United States.美国终末期肝病住院患者的城乡住院死亡率差异。
Liver Transpl. 2019 Sep;25(9):1321-1332. doi: 10.1002/lt.25587. Epub 2019 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Social determinants of health and health outcomes in older cancer survivors.老年癌症幸存者的健康社会决定因素与健康结局
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2025 Mar 1;19(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000746. Epub 2025 Jan 21.