• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性应激促进为与安全相关目标的努力调动。

Acute stress promotes effort mobilization for safety-related goals.

作者信息

Pavlíčková Kristína, Gärtner Judith, Voulgaropoulou Stella D, Fraemke Deniz, Adams Eli, Quaedflieg Conny W E M, Viechtbauer Wolfgang, Hernaus Dennis

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs) Research Institute, Maastricht University, Minderbroedersberg 4-6, 6211 LK, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Max Planck Research Group Biosocial-Biology, Social Disparities, and Development, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Commun Psychol. 2024 Jun 1;2(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00103-7.

DOI:10.1038/s44271-024-00103-7
PMID:39242906
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11332123/
Abstract

Although the acute stress response is a highly adaptive survival mechanism, much remains unknown about how its activation impacts our decisions and actions. Based on its resource-mobilizing function, here we hypothesize that this intricate psychophysiological process may increase the willingness (motivation) to engage in effortful, energy-consuming, actions. Across two experiments (n = 80, n = 84), participants exposed to a validated stress-induction protocol, compared to a no-stress control condition, exhibited an increased willingness to exert physical effort (grip force) in the service of avoiding the possibility of experiencing aversive electrical stimulation (threat-of-shock), but not for the acquisition of rewards (money). Use of computational cognitive models linked this observation to subjective value computations that prioritize safety over the minimization of effort expenditure; especially when facing unlikely threats that can only be neutralized via high levels of grip force. Taken together, these results suggest that activation of the acute stress response can selectively alter the willingness to exert effort for safety-related goals. These findings are relevant for understanding how, under stress, we become motivated to engage in effortful actions aimed at avoiding aversive outcomes.

摘要

尽管急性应激反应是一种高度适应性的生存机制,但关于其激活如何影响我们的决策和行动,仍有许多未知之处。基于其资源调动功能,我们在此假设,这个复杂的心理生理过程可能会增加人们参与费力、耗能行动的意愿(动机)。在两项实验(n = 80,n = 84)中,与无压力对照条件相比,暴露于经过验证的压力诱导方案的参与者,为避免遭受厌恶的电刺激(电击威胁)而表现出更大的施加体力(握力)的意愿,但为获取奖励(金钱)则不然。使用计算认知模型将这一观察结果与主观价值计算联系起来,这些计算将安全性置于努力支出最小化之上;特别是当面对只能通过高水平握力消除的不太可能的威胁时。综上所述,这些结果表明,急性应激反应的激活可以选择性地改变为与安全相关目标而努力的意愿。这些发现对于理解在压力下我们如何被激励去采取旨在避免厌恶结果的费力行动具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/b51bd4090ccd/44271_2024_103_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/c2f671dea1ba/44271_2024_103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/67d1055b354f/44271_2024_103_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/2a12a6c9ec04/44271_2024_103_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/62c5f462d67d/44271_2024_103_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/970fe0ce9089/44271_2024_103_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/b51bd4090ccd/44271_2024_103_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/c2f671dea1ba/44271_2024_103_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/67d1055b354f/44271_2024_103_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/2a12a6c9ec04/44271_2024_103_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/62c5f462d67d/44271_2024_103_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/970fe0ce9089/44271_2024_103_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6d98/11332123/b51bd4090ccd/44271_2024_103_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Acute stress promotes effort mobilization for safety-related goals.急性应激促进为与安全相关目标的努力调动。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Jun 1;2(1):50. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00103-7.
2
Brain stimulation over the left DLPFC enhances motivation for effortful rewards in patients with major depressive disorder.左背外侧前额叶脑刺激增强了重度抑郁症患者对努力奖赏的动机。
J Affect Disord. 2024 Jul 1;356:414-423. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.04.064. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
3
Computational mechanisms underlying the dynamics of physical and cognitive fatigue.物理和认知疲劳动态的计算机制。
Cognition. 2023 Nov;240:105603. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105603. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
4
Acute stress reduces effortful prosocial behaviour.急性应激会减少费力的亲社会行为。
Elife. 2024 Jan 5;12:RP87271. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87271.
5
Caffeine increases psychomotor performance on the effort expenditure for rewards task.咖啡因提高了在努力付出获取奖励任务中的精神运动表现。
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012 Oct;102(4):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
6
The effect of Huntington's disease on cognitive and physical motivation.亨廷顿病对认知和身体动机的影响。
Brain. 2024 Jul 5;147(7):2449-2458. doi: 10.1093/brain/awae023.
7
Dopaminergic medication increases motivation to exert cognitive control by reducing subjective effort costs in Parkinson's patients.多巴胺能药物通过降低帕金森病患者的主观努力成本来增加执行认知控制的动机。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2022 Sep;193:107652. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2022.107652. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
8
The cognitive effort expenditure for rewards task (C-EEfRT): A novel measure of willingness to expend cognitive effort.奖赏认知努力任务(C-EEfRT):一种衡量意愿付出认知努力的新方法。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1237-1248. doi: 10.1037/pas0000563. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
A computational account of why more valuable goals seem to require more effortful actions.为什么更有价值的目标似乎需要更多努力的行为的计算解释。
Elife. 2022 Aug 5;11:e61712. doi: 10.7554/eLife.61712.
10
Dispositional individual differences in cognitive effort investment: establishing the core construct.认知努力投入的性格个体差异:确立核心建构。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Jan 22;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00512-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Everyday helping is associated with enhanced mood but greater stress when it is more effortful.日常帮助与改善情绪有关,但如果需要付出更多努力,就会增加压力。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 15;14(1):24120. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75261-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Acute stress reduces effortful prosocial behaviour.急性应激会减少费力的亲社会行为。
Elife. 2024 Jan 5;12:RP87271. doi: 10.7554/eLife.87271.
2
Stress, associative learning, and decision-making.压力、联想学习和决策。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2023 Oct;204:107812. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107812. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
3
The effect of salience of rewards on effort-based decision making in psychotic disorders.奖赏凸显效应对精神障碍患者基于努力的决策的影响。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 13;22(1):643. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04274-7.
4
Hypoxia and risk preferences: Mild hypoxia impacts choices for low-probability high-payoff bets.缺氧与风险偏好:轻度缺氧影响对低概率高回报赌注的选择。
Front Physiol. 2022 Aug 29;13:960773. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.960773. eCollection 2022.
5
Neither Threat of Shock nor Acute Psychosocial Stress Affects Ambiguity Attitudes.电击威胁和急性社会心理压力均不影响对模糊性的态度。
Affect Sci. 2022;3(2):425-437. doi: 10.1007/s42761-022-00109-6. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
6
An integrative effort: Bridging motivational intensity theory and recent neurocomputational and neuronal models of effort and control allocation.一项综合性的努力:弥合动机强度理论与最近的神经计算和神经元努力与控制分配模型之间的差距。
Psychol Rev. 2023 Jul;130(4):1081-1103. doi: 10.1037/rev0000372. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
7
The neural signature of the decision value of future pain.未来疼痛决策价值的神经特征。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jun 7;119(23):e2119931119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2119931119. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
8
Asymmetric effects of acute stress on cost and benefit learning.急性应激对成本与收益学习的不对称影响。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Apr;138:105646. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105646. Epub 2021 Dec 24.
9
The effect of oral contraceptive use on cortisol reactivity to the Trier Social Stress Test: A meta-analysis.口服避孕药对特里尔社会应激测试中皮质醇反应的影响:一项荟萃分析。
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2022 Feb;136:105626. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2021.105626. Epub 2021 Dec 11.
10
Aversive motivation and cognitive control.厌恶动机与认知控制。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Feb;133:104493. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.12.016. Epub 2021 Dec 12.