Suppr超能文献

咖啡因提高了在努力付出获取奖励任务中的精神运动表现。

Caffeine increases psychomotor performance on the effort expenditure for rewards task.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Ave., MC 3077, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012 Oct;102(4):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jun 29.

Abstract

Preclinical studies suggest that cost/benefit decision-making involves interactions between adenosine and dopamine (DA). In rats, DA depletion decreases willingness to incur effort costs, while adenosine antagonism reverses these effects, likely by increasing DA transmission. Caffeine is a non-selective adenosine antagonist commonly used to facilitate effortful tasks, and thus may affect decisions involving effort costs in humans. The current study examined acute effects of 200 mg of caffeine on willingness to exert effort for monetary rewards at varying levels of reward value and reward probability, in young adult light caffeine users. Based on previous findings with amphetamine, we predicted that caffeine would increase willingness to exert effort. At separate sessions, 23 healthy normal adults received placebo or 200 mg caffeine under counterbalanced double-blind conditions, then completed the effort expenditure for rewards task (EEfRT). Measures of subjective and cardiovascular effects were obtained at regular intervals. Caffeine produced small but significant subjective and cardiovascular effects, and sped psychomotor performance on the EEfRT. Caffeine did not alter willingness to exert effort, except in high cardiovascular responders to caffeine, in whom it decreased willingness to exert effort. These results were contrary to our predictions, but consistent with rodent studies suggesting that moderate doses of caffeine alone do not affect effort, but rather only influence effort in the context of DA antagonism. Our results demonstrate that psychomotor speeding and decisional effects on the EEfRT are dissociable, providing additional evidence for the EEfRT as a specific measure of effort-based decision-making. This study provides a starting point for exploring contributions of the adenosine system to motivation in humans.

摘要

临床前研究表明,成本/效益决策涉及腺苷和多巴胺 (DA) 之间的相互作用。在大鼠中,DA 耗竭会降低付出努力的意愿,而腺苷拮抗作用则会逆转这些影响,可能是通过增加 DA 传递。咖啡因是一种非选择性的腺苷拮抗剂,常用于促进费力的任务,因此可能会影响涉及人类努力成本的决策。本研究在年轻成年轻度咖啡因使用者中,考察了 200mg 咖啡因对不同奖励价值和奖励概率下为金钱奖励付出努力的意愿的急性影响。基于安非他命的先前发现,我们预测咖啡因会增加付出努力的意愿。在单独的会议上,23 名健康的正常成年人在双盲条件下接受安慰剂或 200mg 咖啡因,然后完成努力支出获得奖励任务 (EEfRT)。定期测量主观和心血管效应的措施。咖啡因产生了微小但显著的主观和心血管效应,并加速了 EEFRT 上的精神运动表现。咖啡因并没有改变付出努力的意愿,除了对咖啡因有高心血管反应的人,他们的付出努力的意愿降低了。这些结果与我们的预测相反,但与啮齿动物研究一致,即单独给予中等剂量的咖啡因不会影响努力,而是只会在 DA 拮抗的情况下影响努力。我们的结果表明,EEfRT 上的精神运动加速和决策效应是可分离的,为 EEFRT 作为努力决策的特定测量提供了额外的证据。这项研究为探索人类腺苷系统对动机的贡献提供了一个起点。

相似文献

1
Caffeine increases psychomotor performance on the effort expenditure for rewards task.
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2012 Oct;102(4):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2012.06.016. Epub 2012 Jun 29.
2
Amping up effort: effects of d-amphetamine on human effort-based decision-making.
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 16;31(46):16597-602. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4387-11.2011.
3
The cognitive effort expenditure for rewards task (C-EEfRT): A novel measure of willingness to expend cognitive effort.
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1237-1248. doi: 10.1037/pas0000563. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
4
Pharmacological investigations of effort-based decision-making in humans: Naltrexone and nicotine.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275027. eCollection 2022.
5
Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol reduces willingness to exert effort in women.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 May;239(5):1487-1497. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-06032-1. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
8
Exploring approach motivation: Correlating self-report, frontal asymmetry, and performance in the Effort Expenditure for Rewards Task.
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2020 Dec;20(6):1234-1247. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00829-x. Epub 2020 Sep 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Cross-species translational paradigms for assessing positive valence system as defined by the RDoC matrix.
J Neurochem. 2025 Jan;169(1):e16243. doi: 10.1111/jnc.16243. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
2
Pharmacological investigations of effort-based decision-making in humans: Naltrexone and nicotine.
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0275027. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275027. eCollection 2022.
3
Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol reduces willingness to exert effort in women.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2022 May;239(5):1487-1497. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-06032-1. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
4
Examining the reliability and validity of two versions of the Effort-Expenditure for Rewards Task (EEfRT).
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0262902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262902. eCollection 2022.
6
Caffeine and Selective Adenosine Receptor Antagonists as New Therapeutic Tools for the Motivational Symptoms of Depression.
Front Pharmacol. 2018 Jun 1;9:526. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00526. eCollection 2018.
7
Does Tobacco Abstinence Decrease Reward Sensitivity? A Human Laboratory Test.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2017 Jun 1;19(6):677-685. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw204.
9
Is it Worth the Effort? Novel Insights into Obesity-Associated Alterations in Cost-Benefit Decision-Making.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2016 Jan 12;9:360. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00360. eCollection 2015.

本文引用的文献

1
Sensitivity to cognitive effort mediates psychostimulant effects on a novel rodent cost/benefit decision-making task.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Jul;37(8):1825-37. doi: 10.1038/npp.2012.30. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
2
3
Adenosine A2A receptor antagonism and genetic deletion attenuate the effects of dopamine D2 antagonism on effort-based decision making in mice.
Neuropharmacology. 2012 Apr;62(5-6):2068-77. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.12.033. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
4
Dopaminergic modulation of risky decision-making.
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 30;31(48):17460-70. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3772-11.2011.
5
Amping up effort: effects of d-amphetamine on human effort-based decision-making.
J Neurosci. 2011 Nov 16;31(46):16597-602. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4387-11.2011.
6
Arousal effect of caffeine depends on adenosine A2A receptors in the shell of the nucleus accumbens.
J Neurosci. 2011 Jul 6;31(27):10067-75. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6730-10.2011.
7
Differential effects of selective adenosine antagonists on the effort-related impairments induced by dopamine D1 and D2 antagonism.
Neuroscience. 2010 Sep 29;170(1):268-80. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.05.068. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
8
Differential effects of dopaminergic manipulations on risky choice.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2010 Aug;211(2):209-21. doi: 10.1007/s00213-010-1883-y. Epub 2010 May 22.
10
Differential actions of adenosine A1 and A2A antagonists on the effort-related effects of dopamine D2 antagonism.
Behav Brain Res. 2009 Jul 19;201(1):216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.02.021. Epub 2009 Mar 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验