Department of Anesthesiology, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Evidence-Based Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Sep 6;24(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02701-8.
The primary objective of anesthesiologists during the induction of anaesthesia is to mitigate the operative stress response resulting from endotracheal intubation. In this prospective, randomized controlled trial, our aim was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of employing Index of Consciousness (IoC, IoC1 and IoC2) monitoring in predicting and mitigating circulatory stress induced by endotracheal intubation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy patients under general anesthesia (GA).
We enrolled one hundred and twenty patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy under GA and randomly allocated them to two groups: IoC monitoring guidance (Group T, n = 60) and bispectral index (BIS) monitoring guidance (Group C, n = 60). The primary endpoints included the heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) of the patients, as well as the rate of change (ROC) at specific time points during the endotracheal intubation period. Secondary outcomes encompassed the systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), cardiac output index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), ROC at specific time points, the incidence of adverse events (AEs), and the induction dosage of remifentanil and propofol during the endotracheal intubation period in both groups.
The mean (SD) HR at 1 min after intubation under IoC monitoring guidance was significantly lower than that under BIS monitoring guidance (76 (16) beats/min vs. 82 (16) beats/min, P = 0.049, respectively). Similarly, the mean (SD) MAP at 1 min after intubation under IoC monitoring guidance was lower than that under BIS monitoring guidance (90 (20) mmHg vs. 98 (19) mmHg, P = 0.031, respectively). At each time point from 1 to 5 min after intubation, the number of cases with HR ROC of less than 10% in Group T was significantly higher than in Group C (P < 0.05). Furthermore, between 1 and 3 min and at 5 min post-intubation, the number of cases with HR ROC between 20 to 30% or 40% in Group T was significantly lower than that in Group C (P < 0.05). At 1 min post-intubation, the number of cases with MAP ROC of less than 10% in Group T was significantly higher than that in Group C (P < 0.05), and the number of cases with MAP ROC between 10 to 20% in Group T was significantly lower than that in Group C (P < 0.01). Patients in Group T exhibited superior hemodynamic stability during the peri-endotracheal intubation period compared to those in Group C. There were no significant differences in the frequencies of AEs between the two groups (P > 0.05).
This promising monitoring technique has the potential to predict the circulatory stress response, thereby reducing the incidence of adverse reactions during the peri-endotracheal intubation period. This technology holds promise for optimizing anesthesia management.
Chinese Clinical Trail Registry Identifier: ChiCTR2300070237 (20/04/2022).
麻醉医生在诱导麻醉期间的主要目标是减轻因气管插管引起的手术应激反应。在这项前瞻性、随机对照试验中,我们的目的是评估意识指数(IoC、IoC1 和 IoC2)监测在预测和减轻全身麻醉下腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者气管插管引起的循环应激方面的可行性和疗效。
我们纳入了 120 名计划在全身麻醉下接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者,并将其随机分配到两组:IoC 监测指导组(T 组,n=60)和脑电双频指数(BIS)监测指导组(C 组,n=60)。主要终点包括患者的心率(HR)和平均动脉压(MAP),以及气管插管期间特定时间点的变化率(ROC)。次要结局包括全身血管阻力指数(SVRI)、心输出量指数(CI)、每搏量指数(SVI)、特定时间点的 ROC、不良事件(AE)发生率,以及两组患者气管插管期间瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚的诱导剂量。
IoC 监测指导下插管后 1 分钟的平均(SD)HR 明显低于 BIS 监测指导下的 HR(分别为 76(16)次/分和 82(16)次/分,P=0.049)。同样,IoC 监测指导下插管后 1 分钟的平均(SD)MAP 也低于 BIS 监测指导下的 MAP(分别为 90(20)mmHg 和 98(19)mmHg,P=0.031)。在插管后 1 至 5 分钟的每个时间点,T 组中 HR ROC 小于 10%的病例数明显高于 C 组(P<0.05)。此外,在 1 至 3 分钟和插管后 5 分钟时,T 组中 HR ROC 在 20%至 30%或 40%之间的病例数明显低于 C 组(P<0.05)。在插管后 1 分钟时,T 组中 MAP ROC 小于 10%的病例数明显高于 C 组(P<0.05),而 T 组中 MAP ROC 在 10%至 20%之间的病例数明显低于 C 组(P<0.01)。T 组患者在气管插管期间的血流动力学稳定性优于 C 组。两组不良反应发生率无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
这种有前途的监测技术有可能预测循环应激反应,从而降低气管插管期间不良反应的发生率。这项技术有望优化麻醉管理。
中国临床试验注册中心标识符:ChiCTR2300070237(2022 年 4 月 20 日)。