Suppr超能文献

溃疡性结肠炎相关结直肠癌与散发性结直肠癌预后和复发模式的差异:一项配对分析。

Differences in Prognosis and Recurrence Patterns Between Ulcerative Colitis-Associated Colorectal Cancer and Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: A Matched-Pair Analysis.

机构信息

Inflammatory Bowel Disease Center, Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Nov;31(12):7807-7819. doi: 10.1245/s10434-024-16158-z. Epub 2024 Sep 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Clinicopathological differences exist between ulcerative colitis-associated colorectal cancer (UC-CRC) and sporadic colorectal cancer (S-CRC). However, differences in the prognosis remain controversial, and the reason for these differences remains unclear. We therefore assessed the differences between patients with UC-CRC and S-CRC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a matched-pair analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of patients with UC-CRC and S-CRC who underwent colorectal resection between January 2000 and December 2021 at two institutions. Patients were matched according to age, sex, date of surgery, tumor location, and Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) stage.

RESULTS

A total of 5992 patients underwent surgery for CRC at the two institutions, and 288 patients (48 with UC-CRC and 240 with S-CRC) were matched in this study. Patients with UC-CRC underwent more invasive surgery and had a longer operative time than those with S-CRC, but there was no marked difference in postoperative complications or perioperative mortality. Long-term outcomes showed a similar 5-year overall survival (OS) for UC-CRC and S-CRC (86.5% versus 88.8%, p = 0.742); however, in stage 3 patients, patients with UC-CRC had a poorer 5-year OS than those with S-CRC (51.4% versus 83.8%, p = 0.032). The first recurrence sites in stage 3 UC-CRC were peritoneal dissemination followed by the bones, while those in S-CRC were the liver and pulmonary system.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite no significant differences in surgical outcomes, patients with UC-CRC had a poorer prognosis than those with S-CRC at stage 3. The recurrence patterns in UC-CRC differed from those in S-CRC, suggesting a possible prognostic difference.

摘要

背景

溃疡性结肠炎相关结直肠癌(UC-CRC)和散发性结直肠癌(S-CRC)之间存在临床病理差异。然而,预后的差异仍存在争议,其原因尚不清楚。因此,我们评估了 UC-CRC 和 S-CRC 患者之间的差异。

患者和方法

这是对两家机构在 2000 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月期间接受结直肠切除术的 UC-CRC 和 S-CRC 患者的临床病理特征和预后进行的配对分析。患者根据年龄、性别、手术日期、肿瘤位置和国际抗癌联盟(UICC)分期进行匹配。

结果

两家机构共有 5992 例 CRC 患者接受了手术,本研究中匹配了 288 例患者(48 例 UC-CRC 和 240 例 S-CRC)。UC-CRC 患者接受了更具侵袭性的手术,手术时间也比 S-CRC 患者长,但术后并发症或围手术期死亡率无明显差异。长期结果显示,UC-CRC 和 S-CRC 的 5 年总生存率(OS)相似(86.5%对 88.8%,p=0.742);然而,在 3 期患者中,UC-CRC 患者的 5 年 OS 不如 S-CRC 患者(51.4%对 83.8%,p=0.032)。3 期 UC-CRC 的首次复发部位是腹膜播散,其次是骨骼,而 S-CRC 的首次复发部位是肝脏和肺部系统。

结论

尽管手术结果无显著差异,但 3 期 UC-CRC 患者的预后不如 S-CRC 患者。UC-CRC 的复发模式与 S-CRC 不同,提示可能存在预后差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验