• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

至少需要两种核算体系来核算生态系统生产总值(GEP)。

At least two accounting systems for Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) are needed.

机构信息

Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, U.S. Department of Energy, Riverside, CA, 92507, United States.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122429. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122429. Epub 2024 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122429
PMID:39244937
Abstract

Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) denotes the aggregate value of ecosystem services (ESs) supplied by all ecosystem types within an accounting area for a given accounting period in monetary units and represents one of the multiple types of measures of ES values. The value of each ES is typically calculated by multiplying the ES's quantity by the ES's unit value that may be reflected by various proxies, such as market price, replacement cost, and avoided damage cost. As an economic, ecological, or environmental indicator, GEP should be calculated based on certain standards, allowing for comparison over time and across regions. While many standards, including which ESs to account for and what proxies for ESs' values to use, should be unified to improve the comparability of GEP, this standardization does not mean a single GEP accounting system is sufficient to achieve multiple goals. Instead, at least two accounting systems with different applicability and levels of sophistication are needed. (1) To assess environmental status, ecosystems' capacities to provide ESs, and the performance of environmental governance, there should be a simplified system that accounts for both realized ESs (actually received by humans) and potential ESs (beyond actual humans demands) and adopts a nationwide unified constant unit value of each ES. (2) To assess ESs' actual contributions to socioeconomic development and human well-being, there should be a more sophisticated system that accounts for realized ESs only and adopts a dynamic unit value of each ES. This dynamic unit value should be adjusted to fit local socioeconomic and ecological contexts, consider the tipping point or threshold in each ES's quantity, and reflect the diminishment or increment in the marginal utility of each ES.

摘要

总生态系统产品(Gross Ecosystem Product,GEP)表示在特定核算期内,核算区域内所有生态系统类型提供的生态系统服务(Ecosystem Services,ES)的综合价值,以货币单位表示,是生态系统服务价值的多种度量类型之一。每种生态系统服务的价值通常通过将其数量乘以其单位价值来计算,单位价值可以通过各种替代物来反映,例如市场价格、重置成本和避免损害成本。作为经济、生态或环境指标,GEP 应根据某些标准进行计算,以便在时间和区域上进行比较。虽然包括应核算哪些生态系统服务以及应使用哪些生态系统服务价值替代物在内的许多标准都应统一,以提高 GEP 的可比性,但这种标准化并不意味着单一的 GEP 核算系统足以实现多个目标。相反,至少需要两种具有不同适用性和复杂程度的核算系统。(1) 为了评估环境状况、生态系统提供生态系统服务的能力以及环境治理的绩效,应该有一个简化的系统,既核算已实现的生态系统服务(实际上被人类所获得的)和潜在的生态系统服务(超出实际人类需求的),又采用全国统一的每个生态系统的固定单位价值。(2) 为了评估生态系统对社会经济发展和人类福祉的实际贡献,应该有一个更复杂的系统,只核算已实现的生态系统服务,并采用每个生态系统的动态单位价值。这种动态单位价值应根据当地社会经济和生态背景进行调整,考虑每个生态系统服务数量的临界点或阈值,并反映每个生态系统边际效用的减少或增加。

相似文献

1
At least two accounting systems for Gross Ecosystem Product (GEP) are needed.至少需要两种核算体系来核算生态系统生产总值(GEP)。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122429. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122429. Epub 2024 Sep 8.
2
Land use trade-offs in China's protected areas from the perspective of accounting values of ecosystem services.从生态系统服务核算价值的角度看中国自然保护区的土地利用权衡。
J Environ Manage. 2022 Aug 1;315:115178. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115178. Epub 2022 Apr 30.
3
Gross ecosystem product (GEP): Quantifying nature for environmental and economic policy innovation.总生态系统产品(GEP):为环境和经济政策创新量化自然。
Ambio. 2023 Dec;52(12):1952-1967. doi: 10.1007/s13280-023-01948-8. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
4
A critical review of Gross ecosystem product accounting in China: Status quo, problems and future directions.中国 Gross 生态系统产品核算研究述评:现状、问题与未来方向
J Environ Manage. 2022 Nov 15;322:115995. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115995. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
5
Boundary of ecosystem services: Differentiating between ecosystem services and geosystem services is needed.生态系统服务边界:需要区分生态系统服务和地球系统服务。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;362:121285. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121285. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
6
Changes in gross ecosystem product and its response to land use changes in forest resource dominant regions: A case study of Zixi County, Jiangxi Province, China.森林资源主导区域总生态系统产品变化及其对土地利用变化的响应:以江西省资溪县为例。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2024 Aug;35(8):2197-2205. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202408.020.
7
Boundary of ecosystem services: Guiding future development and application of the ecosystem service concepts.生态系统服务边界:指导生态系统服务概念的未来发展和应用。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Oct 15;344:118752. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118752. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
8
Application of ecosystem value in policy system design: A case study of Fuzhou City, China.应用生态系统价值于政策体系设计:以中国福州市为例。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3815-3823. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.006.
9
Wetland ecosystem service function and its value accounting:A case study of Fuzhou City, China.湿地生态系统服务功能及其价值核算:以福州市为例。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2021 Nov 15;32(11):3824-3834. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.017.
10
Using gross ecosystem product (GEP) to value nature in decision making.运用总生态系统产品(GEP)对自然进行价值评估,将其纳入决策考量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Jun 23;117(25):14593-14601. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1911439117. Epub 2020 Jun 8.