Mankowski Michal A, Wood Nicholas L, Massie Allan B, Segev Dorry L, Trichakis Nikolaos, Gentry Sommer E
Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY.
Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, MN.
Transplantation. 2025 Jan 1;109(1):e36-e44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005184. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
In recent years, changes to US organ allocation have aimed to improve equity and accessibility across regions. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network plans to adopt continuous liver distribution, prioritizing candidates based on a weighted composite allocation score (CAS) incorporating proximity, ABO types, medical urgency, and pediatric priority. The Liver Committee has requested research on CAS variations that account for geographical heterogenicity.
We describe a method for designing a geographically heterogeneous CAS with targeted broader sharing (CAS-TBS) to balance the highly variable geographic distributions of liver transplant listings and liver donations. CAS-TBS assigns each donor hospital to either broader sharing or nearby sharing, adjusting donor-candidate distance allocation points accordingly.
We found that to reduce geographic disparity in the median Model for End-stage Liver Disease at transplant (MMaT), >75% of livers recovered in regions 2 and 10 should be distributed with broader sharing, whereas 95% of livers recovered in regions 5 and 1 should be distributed with nearby sharing. In a 3-y simulation of liver allocation, CAS-TBS decreased MMaT by 2.1 points in high-MMaT areas such as region 5 while increasing MMaT only by 0.65 points in low-MMaT areas such as region 3. CAS-TBS significantly decreased median transport distance from 202 to 167 nautical miles under acuity circles and decreased waitlist deaths.
Our CAS-TBS design methodology could be applied to design geographically heterogeneous allocation scores that reflect transplant community values and priorities within the continuous distribution project of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. In our simulations, the incremental benefit of CAS-TBS over CAS was modest.
近年来,美国器官分配的变革旨在提高各地区的公平性和可及性。器官获取与移植网络计划采用连续肝脏分配方式,根据综合加权分配评分(CAS)对候选者进行优先排序,该评分纳入了距离、ABO血型、医疗紧急程度和儿科优先权等因素。肝脏委员会要求对考虑地理异质性的CAS差异进行研究。
我们描述了一种设计具有目标广泛共享的地理异质性CAS(CAS-TBS)的方法,以平衡肝脏移植登记和肝脏捐赠的高度可变地理分布。CAS-TBS将每个供体医院分配到广泛共享或就近共享类别,并相应调整供体-候选者距离分配点。
我们发现,为了减少移植时终末期肝病模型(MMaT)中位数的地理差异,在2区和10区获取的肝脏中,超过75%应采用广泛共享方式分配,而在5区和1区获取的肝脏中,95%应采用就近共享方式分配。在为期3年的肝脏分配模拟中,CAS-TBS使5区等高MMaT地区的MMaT降低了2.1分,而在3区等低MMaT地区仅使MMaT增加了0.65分。CAS-TBS显著缩短了急症圈内的中位运输距离,从202海里降至167海里,并减少了等待名单上的死亡人数。
我们的CAS-TBS设计方法可应用于设计地理异质性分配评分,以反映器官获取与移植网络连续分配项目中的移植界价值观和优先事项。在我们的模拟中,CAS-TBS相对于CAS的增量效益不大。