• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Removing geographic boundaries from liver allocation: A method for designing continuous distribution scores.消除肝脏分配的地域界限:一种设计连续分配分数的方法。
Clin Transplant. 2023 Sep;37(9):e15017. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15017. Epub 2023 May 19.
2
Targeted Broader Sharing for Liver Continuous Distribution.肝脏持续分配的定向更广泛共享
Transplantation. 2025 Jan 1;109(1):e36-e44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005184. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
3
Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.固定距离和固定人口圈内肝源供需比的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2044-2052. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15297. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Removing administrative boundaries using a gravity model for a national liver allocation system.利用引力模型消除全国肝脏分配系统的行政边界。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):1080-1091. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16214. Epub 2020 Oct 1.
5
US Population Size and Outcomes of Adults on Liver Transplant Waiting Lists.美国肝移植等待名单上成年人的人口规模及结果。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e251759. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.1759.
6
Association of Body Surface Area With Access to Deceased Donor Liver Transplant and Novel Allocation Policies.体表面积与获取已故供体肝移植和新分配政策的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2023 Jun 1;158(6):610-616. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.0191.
7
Inequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease.等待肝移植患者的器官分配不平等:取消终末期肝病模型配型限制的理由。
J Hepatol. 2017 Sep;67(3):517-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 5.
8
Organ distribution without geographic boundaries: A possible framework for organ allocation.打破地域限制的器官分配:器官分配的一种可能框架。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2635-2640. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15115. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
9
Excess waitlist mortality among candidates for multivisceral liver-intestine transplant in acuity circle allocation.急性环分配中多脏器肝肠移植候选者的过度候补名单死亡率。
Am J Transplant. 2024 Jun;24(6):1080-1086. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2024.02.021. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
10
Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation.不均匀性肝分配
Hepatology. 2021 Jul;74(1):312-321. doi: 10.1002/hep.31648.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeted Broader Sharing for Liver Continuous Distribution.肝脏持续分配的定向更广泛共享
Transplantation. 2025 Jan 1;109(1):e36-e44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005184. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
2
Mitigating the Disparate Impacts of Longevity Matching of Kidney Transplants.减轻肾移植寿命匹配的不同影响。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Oct;84(4):397-399. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.06.002. Epub 2024 Jul 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Gerrymandering for Justice: Redistricting U.S. Liver Allocation.为公平而操纵选区划分:美国肝脏分配的重新划分选区
Interfaces (Providence). 2015 Sep-Oct;45(5):462-480. doi: 10.1287/inte.2015.0810. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
2
Liver simulated allocation model does not effectively predict organ offer decisions for pediatric liver transplant candidates.肝脏模拟分配模型并不能有效地预测小儿肝移植候选者的器官供体决策。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Sep;21(9):3157-3162. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16621. Epub 2021 May 13.
3
A revealed preference analysis to develop composite scores approximating lung allocation policy in the U.S.一项揭示性偏好分析,旨在制定近似于美国肺分配政策的综合评分
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01377-7.
4
Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation.不均匀性肝分配
Hepatology. 2021 Jul;74(1):312-321. doi: 10.1002/hep.31648.
5
Continuous distribution as an organ allocation framework.作为一种器官分配框架的连续分布。
Curr Opin Organ Transplant. 2020 Apr;25(2):115-121. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000733.
6
Balancing Efficiency and Fairness in Liver Transplant Access: Tradeoff Curves for the Assessment of Organ Distribution Policies.平衡肝移植机会中的效率与公平:器官分配政策评估的权衡曲线。
Transplantation. 2020 May;104(5):981-987. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003017.
7
Organ distribution without geographic boundaries: A possible framework for organ allocation.打破地域限制的器官分配:器官分配的一种可能框架。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2635-2640. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15115. Epub 2018 Sep 29.
8
Liver Simulated Allocation Modeling: Were the Predictions Accurate for Share 35?肝模拟分配建模:第 35 组的预测准确吗?
Transplantation. 2018 May;102(5):769-774. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002079.
9
Improving Liver Allocation Using Optimized Neighborhoods.利用优化邻域改善肝脏分配
Transplantation. 2017 Feb;101(2):350-359. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001505.
10
Big data in organ transplantation: registries and administrative claims.器官移植中的大数据:登记处与行政索赔数据
Am J Transplant. 2014 Aug;14(8):1723-30. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12777.

消除肝脏分配的地域界限:一种设计连续分配分数的方法。

Removing geographic boundaries from liver allocation: A method for designing continuous distribution scores.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, USA.

Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Clin Transplant. 2023 Sep;37(9):e15017. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15017. Epub 2023 May 19.

DOI:10.1111/ctr.15017
PMID:37204074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10657628/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) is eliminating geographic boundaries in liver allocation, in favor of continuous distribution. Continuous distribution allocates organs via a composite allocation score (CAS): a weighted sum of attributes like medical urgency, candidate biology, and placement efficiency. The opportunity this change represents, to include new variables and features for prioritizing candidates, will require lengthy and contentious discussions to establish community consensus. Continuous distribution could instead be implemented rapidly by computationally translating the allocation priorities for pediatric, status 1, and O/B blood type liver candidates that are presently implemented via geographic boundaries into points and weights in a CAS.

METHODS

Using simulation with optimization, we designed a CAS that is minimally disruptive to existing prioritizations, and that eliminates geographic boundaries and minimizes waitlist deaths without harming vulnerable populations.

RESULTS

Compared with Acuity Circles (AC) in a 3-year simulation, our optimized CAS decreased deaths from 7771.2 to 7678.8 while decreasing average (272.66 NM vs. 264.30 NM) and median (201.14 NM vs. 186.49 NM) travel distances. Our CAS increased travel only for high MELD and status 1 candidates (423.24 NM vs. 298.74 NM), and reduced travel for other candidates (198.98 NM vs. 250.09 NM); overall travel burden decreased.

CONCLUSION

Our CAS reduced waitlist deaths by sending livers for high-MELD and status 1 candidates farther, while keeping livers for lower MELD candidates nearby. This advanced computational method can be applied again after wider discussions of adding new priorities conclude; our method designs score weightings to achieve any specified feasible allocation outcomes.

摘要

背景

器官获取与移植网络(OPTN)正在取消肝脏分配的地理边界,转而采用连续分配。连续分配通过复合分配评分(CAS)分配器官:对医疗紧急程度、候选者生物学和安置效率等属性的加权总和。这种变化代表了一个机会,可以纳入新的变量和功能来优先考虑候选者,这将需要进行冗长而有争议的讨论,以建立社区共识。连续分配也可以通过计算将目前通过地理边界实施的儿科、1 级状态和 O/B 血型肝脏候选者的分配优先级转换为 CAS 中的分数和权重来快速实施。

方法

我们使用模拟和优化设计了一个 CAS,该 CAS 对现有优先级的干扰最小,消除了地理边界,并最大限度地减少了等待名单上的死亡人数,而不会损害弱势群体。

结果

与 3 年模拟中的敏锐度循环(AC)相比,我们的优化 CAS 将死亡人数从 7771.2 人减少到 7678.8 人,同时降低了平均(272.66 NM 与 264.30 NM)和中位数(201.14 NM 与 186.49 NM)的旅行距离。我们的 CAS 仅增加了高 MELD 和 1 级状态候选者的旅行距离(423.24 NM 与 298.74 NM),并减少了其他候选者的旅行距离(198.98 NM 与 250.09 NM);整体旅行负担减轻。

结论

我们的 CAS 通过将肝脏分配给高 MELD 和 1 级状态的候选者更远的地方,同时将低 MELD 候选者的肝脏保留在附近,从而减少了等待名单上的死亡人数。在更广泛地讨论添加新优先级后,可以再次应用这种先进的计算方法;我们的方法设计评分权重以实现任何指定的可行分配结果。