• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Allocating kidneys in optimized heterogeneous circles.优化的异种环中肾脏的分配。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):1179-1185. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16274. Epub 2020 Sep 10.
2
Heterogeneous Circles for Liver Allocation.不均匀性肝分配
Hepatology. 2021 Jul;74(1):312-321. doi: 10.1002/hep.31648.
3
Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.固定距离和固定人口圈内肝源供需比的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2044-2052. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15297. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
4
Heterogeneous donor circles for fair liver transplant allocation.异体供者肝移植公平分配的环。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2024 Mar;27(1):20-45. doi: 10.1007/s10729-022-09602-7. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
5
Allocation of the Highest Quality Kidneys and Transplant Outcomes Under the New Kidney Allocation System.新的肾脏分配系统下最优质量肾脏的分配与移植结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 May;73(5):605-614. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.12.036. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
6
Kidney nonprocurement in solid organ donors in the United States.美国实体器官捐献者的肾脏未被获取情况。
Am J Transplant. 2020 Dec;20(12):3413-3425. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15952. Epub 2020 May 16.
7
Effects of High-Risk Kidneys on Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients Program Quality Reports.高风险肾脏对移植受者科学注册项目质量报告的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Sep;16(9):2646-53. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13783. Epub 2016 Apr 5.
8
Association of Race and Ethnicity With High Longevity Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation Under the US Kidney Allocation System.种族和民族与美国肾脏分配系统下长寿已故供体肾移植的关系。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2024 Oct;84(4):416-426. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.02.017. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
9
Kidney accelerated placement project: Outcomes and lessons learned.肾脏加速安置项目:成果与经验教训。
Am J Transplant. 2022 Jan;22(1):210-221. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16859. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
10
Variation in use of procurement biopsies and its implications for discard of deceased donor kidneys recovered for transplantation.使用获取活检的差异及其对为移植而回收的已故供体肾脏废弃的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Aug;19(8):2241-2251. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15325. Epub 2019 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Allocating deceased donors using local vs. imported renal allografts: Logistics are more important than distance.使用本地与进口肾移植分配已故供体:后勤保障比距离更重要。
Surg Pract Sci. 2023 May 3;13:100175. doi: 10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100175. eCollection 2023 Jun.
2
Short-term Pains for Long-term Gains? In Search of More Solutions to Inequities in Kidney Transplantation.短期痛苦换取长期收益?探寻肾移植不平等问题的更多解决方案。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2025 Feb;85(2):182-183. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2024.10.002. Epub 2024 Dec 7.
3
Targeted Broader Sharing for Liver Continuous Distribution.肝脏持续分配的定向更广泛共享
Transplantation. 2025 Jan 1;109(1):e36-e44. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000005184. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
4
Increased volume of organ offers and decreased efficiency of kidney placement under circle-based kidney allocation.基于环的肾脏分配下,器官供体数量增加,肾脏放置效率降低。
Am J Transplant. 2023 Aug;23(8):1209-1220. doi: 10.1016/j.ajt.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 May 16.
5
Increased Logistical Burden in Circle-based Kidney Allocation.基于循环的肾脏分配中后勤负担的增加
Transplantation. 2022 Oct 1;106(10):1885-1887. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004127. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
6
Pediatric Kidney Transplantation-Can We Do Better? The Promise and Limitations of Epitope/Eplet Matching.小儿肾移植——我们能做得更好吗?表位/表位组匹配的前景与局限
Front Pediatr. 2022 Jun 3;10:893002. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.893002. eCollection 2022.
7
Logistical burden of offers and allocation inefficiency in circle-based liver allocation.基于循环的肝脏分配中,供体的分配缺乏效率,造成了后勤负担。
Liver Transpl. 2023 Jan 1;29(1):26-33. doi: 10.1002/lt.26527. Epub 2022 Aug 4.

本文引用的文献

1
Geographic disparities in liver supply/demand ratio within fixed-distance and fixed-population circles.固定距离和固定人口圈内肝源供需比的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jul;19(7):2044-2052. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15297. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
2
Report of National Kidney Foundation Consensus Conference to Decrease Kidney Discards.美国肾脏基金会降低肾脏废弃共识会议报告。
Clin Transplant. 2019 Jan;33(1):e13419. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13419. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
3
And equal access for all? The future of deceased donor kidney allocation.以及人人平等的获取机会? deceased donor kidney allocation的未来。(注:“deceased donor kidney allocation”直译为“已故捐赠者肾脏分配”,但结合语境推测这里可能是某个特定的关于已故捐赠者肾脏分配的项目之类的名称,由于原文未明确,暂按字面翻译)
Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug;18(8):1837-1838. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14964. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
4
Factors leading to the discard of deceased donor kidneys in the United States.导致美国死亡供体肾脏被丢弃的因素。
Kidney Int. 2018 Jul;94(1):187-198. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.02.016. Epub 2018 May 5.
5
Measuring and monitoring equity in access to deceased donor kidney transplantation.衡量和监测公平获得已故供体肾移植的机会。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Aug;18(8):1924-1935. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14922. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
6
Hard-to-place kidney offers: Donor- and system-level predictors of discard.难以匹配的肾脏供体:导致废弃的供体和系统水平预测因素。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Nov;18(11):2708-2718. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14712. Epub 2018 Apr 2.
7
Geographic disparity in kidney transplantation under KAS.KAS 下的肾移植中的地域差异。
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jun;18(6):1415-1423. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14622. Epub 2018 Jan 27.
8
Early Experience with the New Kidney Allocation System: A Perspective from a Transplant Center.新肾脏分配系统的早期经验:来自一家移植中心的视角
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Dec 7;12(12):2060-2062. doi: 10.2215/CJN.07520717. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
9
Long Cold Ischemia Times in Same Hospital Deceased Donor Transplants.同一医院供体移植中长时间冷缺血。
Transplantation. 2018 Mar;102(3):471-477. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001957.
10
The weekend effect alters the procurement and discard rates of deceased donor kidneys in the United States.周末效应改变了美国已故捐赠者肾脏的获取和丢弃率。
Kidney Int. 2016 Jul;90(1):157-63. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.007. Epub 2016 May 12.

优化的异种环中肾脏的分配。

Allocating kidneys in optimized heterogeneous circles.

机构信息

Industrial Engineering Department, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2021 Mar;21(3):1179-1185. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16274. Epub 2020 Sep 10.

DOI:10.1111/ajt.16274
PMID:32808468
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11526335/
Abstract

Recently, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network approved a plan to allocate kidneys within 250-nm circles around donor hospitals. These homogeneous circles might not substantially reduce geographic differences in transplant rates because deceased donor kidney supply and demand differ across the country. Using Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data from 2016-2019, we used an integer program to design unique, heterogeneous circles with sizes between 100 and 500 nm that reduced supply/demand ratio variation across transplant centers. We weighted demand according to wait time because candidates who have waited longer have higher priority. We compared supply/demand ratios and average travel distance of kidneys, using heterogeneous circles and 250 and 500-nm fixed-distance homogeneous circles. We found that 40% of circles could be 250 nm or smaller, while reducing supply/demand ratio variation more than homogeneous circles. Supply/demand ratios across centers for heterogeneous circles ranged from 0.06 to 0.13 kidneys per wait-year, compared to 0.04 to 0.47 and 0.05 to 0.15 kidneys per wait-year for 250-nm and 500-nm homogeneous circles, respectively. The average travel distance for kidneys using heterogeneous, and 250-nm and 500-nm fixed-distance circles was 173 nm, 134 nm, and 269 nm, respectively. Heterogeneous circles reduce geographic disparity compared to homogeneous circles, while maintaining reasonable travel distances.

摘要

最近,器官获取和移植网络批准了一项计划,即在捐赠医院周围 250nm 范围内分配肾脏。这些同质的圆圈可能不会显著减少移植率的地域差异,因为全国范围内死亡供体肾脏的供应和需求存在差异。利用 2016-2019 年的移植受者登记处数据,我们使用整数规划来设计大小在 100nm 到 500nm 之间的独特、异质圆圈,以减少移植中心之间的供需比变化。我们根据等待时间对需求进行加权,因为等待时间较长的候选人具有更高的优先级。我们比较了使用异质圆圈和 250nm 和 500nm 固定距离同质圆圈的供需比和肾脏的平均旅行距离。我们发现,40%的圆圈可以是 250nm 或更小,同时减少了同质圆圈的供需比变化。异质圆圈的中心之间的供需比范围为每等待年 0.06 到 0.13 个肾脏,而 250nm 和 500nm 同质圆圈的供需比范围分别为每等待年 0.04 到 0.47 和 0.05 到 0.15 个肾脏。使用异质、250nm 和 500nm 固定距离圆圈的肾脏平均旅行距离分别为 173nm、134nm 和 269nm。与同质圆圈相比,异质圆圈减少了地域差异,同时保持了合理的旅行距离。