Suppr超能文献

临床实验室中单份标本气动传输系统的验证。

Validation of a single specimen pneumatic tube system in the clinical laboratory.

机构信息

Xi'an Area Medical Laboratory Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710116, P.R. China.

Xi'an Area Medical Laboratory Center, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710116, P.R. China, School of Medicine, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710069, P.R. China.

出版信息

Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2024 Sep 19;82(4):439-445. doi: 10.1684/abc.2024.1912.

Abstract

The single-specimen pneumatic tube (PTS) is a commonly used rapid specimen delivery system in modern clinical laboratories. However, its impact on sample integrity and laboratory test results remains controversial. The installation and configuration of single-specimen PTS are unique to their institution. We sought to validate our single-specimen PTS by comparing routine chemistry, immunology, and hematology results with a repeat sample integrity index for manual transport. In 2023, 30 employees were randomly selected from the company medical examination, and three tubes of procoagulant serum samples and three tubes of EDTA anticoagulant blood samples were collected from each of them. Group A uses a single specimen PTS at 8 m/s, Group B uses a single specimen PTS at 15 m/s, and Group C uses manual transfer. Specimens from all three groups were simultaneously analysed for ALT, AST, TG, TC, LDL, K, NA, CI, TSH, hs-cTnT, NSE, Cyfra21-1 and haematological analysis. The differences between the three groups of NSE and Cyfra21-1 were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The differences of the rest of the items were not statistically significant. The difference in NSE was not statistically significant between groups A and B (P = 0.401), B and C, and C and A (P < 0.05). The difference in Cyfra21-1 was not statistically significant between groups A and B (P = 0.897), B and C (P = 0.052), and C and A (P = 0.145). Individual sample PTS should be validated for testing prior to use to ensure the results' accuracy.

摘要

单标本气动输送管(PTS)是现代临床实验室常用的快速标本输送系统。然而,其对标本完整性和实验室检测结果的影响仍存在争议。单标本 PTS 的安装和配置是其机构所特有的。我们试图通过比较手动运输的重复样本完整性指数来验证我们的单标本 PTS。2023 年,从公司体检中随机抽取 30 名员工,每人采集 3 管促凝血清样本和 3 管 EDTA 抗凝全血样本。A 组以 8m/s 的速度使用单标本 PTS,B 组以 15m/s 的速度使用单标本 PTS,C 组采用手动传输。所有三组标本同时进行 ALT、AST、TG、TC、LDL、K、NA、CI、TSH、hs-cTnT、NSE、Cyfra21-1 和血液分析。三组 NSE 和 Cyfra21-1 的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。其余项目的差异无统计学意义。A 组和 B 组、B 组和 C 组、C 组和 A 组 NSE 差异无统计学意义(P=0.401)。A 组和 B 组、B 组和 C 组 Cyfra21-1 差异无统计学意义(P=0.897)。

使用前应单独验证 PTS 样本检测,以确保结果的准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验