Stein Timo, Gehrer Nina, Jusyte Aiste, Scheeff Jonathan, Schönenberg Michael
Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University of Tübingen, Germany.
Psychol Med. 2024 Sep 9;54(12):1-9. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724001417.
Altered affective state recognition is assumed to be a root cause of aggressive behavior, a hallmark of psychopathologies such as psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder. However, the two most influential models make markedly different predictions regarding the underlying mechanism. According to the integrated emotion system theory (IES), aggression reflects impaired processing of social distress cues such as fearful faces. In contrast, the hostile attribution bias (HAB) model explains aggression with a bias to interpret ambiguous expressions as angry.
In a set of four experiments, we measured processing of fearful and angry facial expressions (compared to neutral and other expressions) in a sample of 65 male imprisoned violent offenders rated using the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R, Hare, R. D. (1991). . Toronto, ON: Multi-Health Systems) and in 60 age-matched control participants.
There was no evidence for a fear deficit in violent offenders or for an association of psychopathy or aggression with impaired processing of fearful faces. Similarly, there was no evidence for a perceptual bias for angry faces linked to psychopathy or aggression. However, using highly ambiguous stimuli and requiring explicit labeling of emotions, violent offenders showed a categorization bias for anger and this anger bias correlated with self-reported trait aggression (but not with psychopathy).
These results add to a growing literature casting doubt on the notion that fear processing is impaired in aggressive individuals and in psychopathy and provide support for the idea that aggression is related to a hostile attribution bias that emerges from later cognitive, post-perceptual processing stages.
情感状态识别改变被认为是攻击行为的一个根本原因,攻击行为是精神病态和反社会人格障碍等精神病理学的一个标志。然而,两个最具影响力的模型对潜在机制的预测却明显不同。根据整合情绪系统理论(IES),攻击行为反映了对社会痛苦线索(如恐惧面孔)的加工受损。相比之下,敌意归因偏差(HAB)模型用将模糊表情解释为愤怒的偏差来解释攻击行为。
在一组四项实验中,我们在65名使用《哈雷精神病态量表修订版》(PCL - R,哈雷,R.D.(1991年)。多伦多,安大略省:多健康系统公司)进行评分的男性在押暴力罪犯样本以及60名年龄匹配的对照参与者中,测量了对恐惧和愤怒面部表情(与中性和其他表情相比)的加工情况。
没有证据表明暴力罪犯存在恐惧缺陷,也没有证据表明精神病态或攻击行为与恐惧面孔加工受损有关。同样,也没有证据表明与精神病态或攻击行为相关的对愤怒面孔存在知觉偏差。然而,使用高度模糊的刺激并要求对情绪进行明确标注时,暴力罪犯表现出对愤怒的分类偏差,并且这种愤怒偏差与自我报告的特质攻击行为相关(但与精神病态无关)。
这些结果进一步增加了对攻击个体和精神病态中恐惧加工受损这一观点的质疑,为攻击行为与后期认知、知觉后加工阶段出现的敌意归因偏差有关这一观点提供了支持。