• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

33项儿童创伤问卷在中国青少年中的因素分析及一年重测信度评估。

Factor analysis and evaluation of one-year test-retest reliability of the 33-item Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in Chinese adolescents.

作者信息

Zhang Jiamei, Wu Zhipeng, Chen Min, Gao Yan, Liu Zhening, Long Yicheng, Chen Xudong

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 23;15:1384807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384807. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384807
PMID:39246309
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11377256/
Abstract

The 33-item Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-33) is a recently developed tool expanded from the 28-item Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-28) to assess childhood trauma events, which showed good test-retest reliability over 2 weeks. However, little is known regarding the factor structure and long-term test-retest reliability of the CTQ-33. To fill such a gap, this study investigated the factorial validity of the CTQ-33 and test-retest reliability of the scale over a relatively long interval of 1 year. Data on demographics, the CTQ-33 scores, and mental health statuses such as depressive/anxiety symptoms were collected in Chinese adolescents ( = 188) twice across a one-year period. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) revealed that the Chinese version of CTQ-33 has close factor validity when compared to the original CTQ-28 in college students. Furthermore, the total and most subscale scores of the CTQ-33 have fair to good test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficients >0.6 for the total score, and > 0.4 for most subscales), except for the physical abuse subscale. Moreover, we replicated previous findings of significant positive relationships between levels of different childhood trauma subtypes using the CTQ-33. These findings provide initial evidence supporting that the CTQ-33 is overall reliable to assess childhood traumatic events in adolescents over relatively long intervals.

摘要

33项儿童创伤问卷(CTQ - 33)是一种最近开发的工具,它是在28项儿童创伤问卷(CTQ - 28)的基础上扩展而来,用于评估儿童创伤事件,该问卷在2周内显示出良好的重测信度。然而,关于CTQ - 33的因子结构和长期重测信度知之甚少。为了填补这一空白,本研究调查了CTQ - 33的因子效度以及该量表在长达1年的相对较长时间间隔内的重测信度。在一年的时间里,对188名中国青少年进行了两次数据收集,内容包括人口统计学数据、CTQ - 33得分以及抑郁/焦虑症状等心理健康状况。验证性因子分析(CFA)结果显示,与大学生中原始的CTQ - 28相比,中文版CTQ - 33具有相近的因子效度。此外,CTQ - 33的总分和大多数子量表得分具有较好至良好的重测信度(组内相关系数总分>0.6,大多数子量表>0.4),身体虐待子量表除外。此外,我们使用CTQ - 33重复了先前关于不同儿童创伤亚型水平之间存在显著正相关关系的研究结果。这些发现提供了初步证据,支持CTQ - 33在相对较长时间间隔内评估青少年儿童创伤事件总体上是可靠的。

相似文献

1
Factor analysis and evaluation of one-year test-retest reliability of the 33-item Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in Chinese adolescents.33项儿童创伤问卷在中国青少年中的因素分析及一年重测信度评估。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 23;15:1384807. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1384807. eCollection 2024.
2
Overprotection and overcontrol in childhood: An evaluation on reliability and validity of 33-item expanded Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-33), Chinese version.童年期过度保护和过度控制:33 项扩充版儿童期创伤问卷(CTQ-33)中文版的信度和效度评估。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 Feb;68:102962. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102962. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
3
Evaluation on Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of the Short-Form Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in Patients with Schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者童年期创伤问卷简版的长期重测信度评估
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021 Jul 13;14:1033-1040. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S316398. eCollection 2021.
4
Psychometric properties and normative data of the childhood trauma questionnaire-short form in Chinese adolescents.中国青少年版儿童创伤问卷简表的心理测量学特性及常模数据
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 27;14:1130683. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1130683. eCollection 2023.
5
Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF): Dimensionality, validity, reliability and gender invariance among Nigerian adolescents.儿童创伤问卷-短式(CTQ-SF):尼日利亚青少年的维度、效度、信度和性别不变性。
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 Mar;101:104357. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104357. Epub 2020 Jan 25.
6
Reliability and validity of the korean version of the childhood trauma questionnaire-short form for psychiatric outpatients.《儿童创伤问卷-短式韩文版用于精神科门诊患者的信度和效度》
Psychiatry Investig. 2011 Dec;8(4):305-11. doi: 10.4306/pi.2011.8.4.305. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
7
Psychometric Properties and Measurement Invariance of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (Short Form) Across Genders, Time Points and Presence of Major Depressive Disorder Among Chinese Adolescents.中国青少年中儿童创伤问卷(简版)在不同性别、时间点及是否患有重度抑郁症情况下的心理测量特性与测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 11;13:816051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.816051. eCollection 2022.
8
Test-retest reliability of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire in psychotic disorders.《儿童创伤问卷》在精神障碍中的重测信度
J Psychiatr Res. 2022 Dec;156:78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.09.053. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
9
Internal consistency and test-retest reliability: A reliability generalization meta-analysis of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire - Short Form (CTQ-SF).内部一致性和重测信度:儿童期创伤问卷-短式(CTQ-SF)的可靠性综合元分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Aug;154:106941. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106941. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
10
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire-Short Form for inpatients with schizophrenia.中文版儿童创伤问卷-短式在精神分裂症住院患者中的信度和效度。
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 13;13(12):e0208779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208779. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Case Report: Nonverbal approaches in the treatment of a patient with fibromyalgia with anger rooted in adverse childhood experiences.病例报告:对一名因童年不良经历而愤怒的纤维肌痛患者采用非言语治疗方法。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 May 16;5:1374324. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1374324. eCollection 2024.
2
Profile and mental health characterization of childhood overprotection/overcontrol experiences among Chinese university students: a nationwide survey.中国大学生童年期过度保护/过度控制经历的特征及心理健康状况:一项全国性调查
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Oct 16;14:1238254. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1238254. eCollection 2023.
3
The predictive role of psychotic-like experiences in suicidal ideation among technical secondary school and college students during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间,技术中学和大学生中类精神病体验对自杀意念的预测作用。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 19;23(1):521. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05025-y.
4
Evaluating test-retest reliability and sex-/age-related effects on temporal clustering coefficient of dynamic functional brain networks.评估动态功能脑网络时间聚类系数的重测信度和性别/年龄相关影响。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2023 Apr 15;44(6):2191-2208. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26202. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Adverse childhood experiences and their impacts on subsequent depression and cognitive impairment in Chinese adults: A nationwide multi-center study.中文译文:中国成年人的不良童年经历及其对随后抑郁和认知障碍的影响:一项全国多中心研究。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Feb 15;323:884-892. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.12.058. Epub 2022 Dec 22.
6
Childhood trauma and postpartum care use, estimating mediation by posttraumatic stress disorder and depressive symptoms.儿童期创伤与产后保健利用,估计创伤后应激障碍和抑郁症状的中介作用。
Ann Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;76:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2022.09.007. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
7
Epidemiology of childhood trauma and its association with insomnia and psychotic-like experiences in Chinese Zhuang adolescents.中国壮族青少年儿童期创伤的流行病学及其与失眠和类精神病体验的关联
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 22;13:974674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.974674. eCollection 2022.
8
Complex post-traumatic stress disorder.复杂性创伤后应激障碍。
Lancet. 2022 Jul 2;400(10345):60-72. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00821-2.
9
Overprotection and overcontrol in childhood: An evaluation on reliability and validity of 33-item expanded Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ-33), Chinese version.童年期过度保护和过度控制:33 项扩充版儿童期创伤问卷(CTQ-33)中文版的信度和效度评估。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2022 Feb;68:102962. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102962. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
10
Examining the Associations Between Childhood Trauma, Resilience, and Depression: A Multivariate Meta-Analysis.探究童年创伤、复原力与抑郁之间的关联:一项多变量荟萃分析。
Trauma Violence Abuse. 2023 Jan;24(1):231-244. doi: 10.1177/15248380211029397. Epub 2021 Jul 27.