• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开发和实施决策支持系统以改善巴西资源有限地区的高血压和糖尿病控制:混合方法研究。

Development and Implementation of a Decision Support System to Improve Control of Hypertension and Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Area in Brazil: Mixed Methods Study.

机构信息

Medical School, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

Telehealth Center, University Hospital, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e18872. doi: 10.2196/18872.

DOI:10.2196/18872
PMID:33427686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7834943/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The low levels of control of hypertension and diabetes mellitus are a challenge that requires innovative strategies to surpass barriers of low sources, distance, and quality of health care.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to develop a clinical decision support system (CDSS) for diabetes and hypertension management in primary care, to implement it in a resource-constrained region, and to evaluate its usability and health care practitioner satisfaction.

METHODS

This mixed methods study is a substudy of HealthRise Brazil Project, a multinational study designed to implement pilot programs to improve screening, diagnosis, management, and control of hypertension and diabetes among underserved communities. Following the identification of gaps in usual care, a team of clinicians established the software functional requirements. Recommendations from evidence-based guidelines were reviewed and organized into a decision algorithm, which bases the CDSS reminders and suggestions. Following pretesting and expert panel assessment, pilot testing was conducted in a quasi-experimental study, which included 34 primary care units of 10 municipalities in a resource-constrained area in Brazil. A Likert-scale questionnaire evaluating perceived feasibility, usability, and utility of the application and professionals' satisfaction was applied after 6 months. In the end-line assessment, 2 focus groups with primary care physicians and nurses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 159 reminders and suggestions were created and implemented for the CDSS. At the 6-month assessment, there were 1939 patients registered in the application database and 2160 consultations were performed by primary care teams. Of the 96 health care professionals who were invited for the usability assessment, 26% (25/96) were physicians, 46% (44/96) were nurses, and 28% (27/96) were other health professionals. The questionnaire included 24 items on impressions of feasibility, usability, utility, and satisfaction, and presented global Cronbach α of .93. As for feasibility, all professionals agreed (median scores of 4 or 5) that the application could be used in primary care settings and it could be easily incorporated in work routines, but physicians claimed that the application might have caused significant delays in daily routines. As for usability, overall evaluation was good and it was claimed that the application was easy to understand and use. All professionals agreed that the application was useful (score 4 or 5) to promote prevention, assist treatment, and might improve patient care, and they were overall satisfied with the application (median scores between 4 and 5). In the end-line assessment, there were 4211 patients (94.82% [3993/4211] with hypertension and 24.41% [1028/4211] with diabetes) registered in the application's database and 7960 consultations were performed by primary health care teams. The 17 participants of the focus groups were consistent to affirm they were very satisfied with the CDSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The CDSS was applicable in the context of primary health care settings in low-income regions, with good user satisfaction and potential to improve adherence to evidence-based practices.

摘要

背景

高血压和糖尿病的控制水平较低是一个挑战,需要创新策略来克服资源匮乏、距离远和医疗质量低等障碍。

目的

本研究旨在开发一种用于初级保健的糖尿病和高血压管理的临床决策支持系统(CDSS),并在资源有限的地区实施,同时评估其可用性和医疗保健从业者的满意度。

方法

这是一项混合方法研究,是 HealthRise Brazil 项目的子研究,该项目是一项多国研究,旨在实施试点计划,以改善服务不足社区的高血压和糖尿病的筛查、诊断、管理和控制。在确定常规护理中的差距后,一组临床医生确定了软件的功能要求。审查了基于证据的指南建议,并将其组织成决策算法,为 CDSS 的提醒和建议提供依据。经过预测试和专家小组评估后,在巴西一个资源有限地区的 10 个城市的 34 个初级保健单位进行了试点测试。在 6 个月后,应用了一份评估应用程序的感知可行性、可用性和实用性以及专业人员满意度的李克特量表问卷。在最终评估中,对初级保健医生和护士进行了 2 次焦点小组讨论。

结果

共创建并实施了 159 个提醒和建议,用于 CDSS。在 6 个月的评估中,应用程序数据库中注册了 1939 名患者,初级保健团队进行了 2160 次咨询。在受邀评估可用性的 96 名医疗保健专业人员中,26%(25/96)是医生,46%(44/96)是护士,28%(27/96)是其他卫生专业人员。该问卷包含 24 个关于可行性、可用性、实用性和满意度的印象的项目,总体 Cronbach α 为.93。关于可行性,所有专业人员都一致认为(中位数为 4 或 5)该应用程序可用于初级保健环境,并且易于融入工作流程,但医生认为该应用程序可能导致日常工作出现显著延迟。关于可用性,总体评价良好,并且声称该应用程序易于理解和使用。所有专业人员都认为该应用程序具有实用性(得分为 4 或 5),可用于促进预防、辅助治疗,并可能改善患者护理,并且他们对该应用程序总体感到满意(中位数得分在 4 到 5 之间)。在最终评估中,应用程序数据库中注册了 4211 名患者(94.82%[3993/4211]患有高血压,24.41%[1028/4211]患有糖尿病),初级卫生保健团队进行了 7960 次咨询。17 名焦点小组参与者一致表示,他们对 CDSS 非常满意。

结论

CDSS 适用于低收入地区的初级保健环境,用户满意度高,有潜力提高对基于证据的实践的依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/b2c86b5264c7/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/3122ad9a1200/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/96831be1a178/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/1262df4d3b26/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/c70542cff388/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/a9240f5df9cf/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/b2c86b5264c7/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/3122ad9a1200/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/96831be1a178/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/1262df4d3b26/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/c70542cff388/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/a9240f5df9cf/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a5cd/7834943/b2c86b5264c7/jmir_v23i1e18872_fig6.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Implementation of a Decision Support System to Improve Control of Hypertension and Diabetes in a Resource-Constrained Area in Brazil: Mixed Methods Study.开发和实施决策支持系统以改善巴西资源有限地区的高血压和糖尿病控制:混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 11;23(1):e18872. doi: 10.2196/18872.
2
Development and Evaluation of a Mobile Decision Support System for Hypertension Management in the Primary Care Setting in Brazil: Mixed-Methods Field Study on Usability, Feasibility, and Utility.开发和评估一种用于巴西初级保健环境中高血压管理的移动决策支持系统:关于可用性、可行性和实用性的混合方法实地研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 25;7(3):e9869. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9869.
3
Scale up of implementation of a multidimensional intervention to enhance hypertension and diabetes care at the primary care setting: A protocol for a cluster-randomized study in Brazil.在基层医疗环境中扩大实施多维干预措施以加强高血压和糖尿病护理:巴西的一项整群随机研究方案。
Am Heart J. 2023 Aug;262:119-130. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
4
The effects of computerised decision support systems on nursing and allied health professional performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review and user contextualisation.计算机化决策支持系统对护理及相关健康专业人员绩效和患者结局的影响:一项系统综述与用户情境化分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Oct;12(40):1-93. doi: 10.3310/GRNM5147.
5
Review of electronic decision-support tools for diabetes care: a viable option for low- and middle-income countries?糖尿病护理电子决策支持工具综述:低收入和中等收入国家的可行选择?
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 1;5(3):553-70. doi: 10.1177/193229681100500310.
6
The Integrated Tracking, Referral, and Electronic Decision Support, and Care Coordination (I-TREC) program: scalable strategies for the management of hypertension and diabetes within the government healthcare system of India.集成式跟踪、转介、电子决策支持和护理协调(I-TREC)计划:印度政府医疗体系中管理高血压和糖尿病的可扩展策略。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1022. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05851-w.
7
Paving the Way for the Implementation of a Decision Support System for Antibiotic Prescribing in Primary Care in West Africa: Preimplementation and Co-Design Workshop With Physicians.为西非初级保健中抗生素处方决策支持系统的实施铺平道路:与医生的实施前和协同设计研讨会
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e17940. doi: 10.2196/17940.
8
An Electronic Clinical Decision Support System for the Assessment and Management of Suicidality in Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study.用于基层医疗中自杀倾向评估与管理的电子临床决策支持系统:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Dec 7;7(12):e11135. doi: 10.2196/11135.
9
Decision-support tools via mobile devices to improve quality of care in primary healthcare settings.移动设备决策支持工具改善基层医疗服务质量。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 27;7(7):CD012944. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012944.pub2.
10
The effect of electronic medical record-based clinical decision support on HIV care in resource-constrained settings: a systematic review.基于电子病历的临床决策支持对资源有限环境下 HIV 护理的影响:系统评价。
Int J Med Inform. 2012 Oct;81(10):e83-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.07.010. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Intensive Blood Pressure Control Versus Standard Control on Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.强化血压控制与标准血压控制对心血管结局的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2025 Jul 7;17(7):e87456. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87456. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Empowering Community Health Workers With Scripted Medicine: Design Science Research Study.用脚本化医学赋能社区卫生工作者:设计科学研究
JMIR Hum Factors. 2025 Apr 23;12:e57545. doi: 10.2196/57545.
3
A scoping review of digital health technologies in multimorbidity management: mechanisms, outcomes, challenges, and strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Performance of the Framingham risk models and pooled cohort equations for predicting 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.弗拉明汉风险模型和队列汇总方程预测心血管疾病 10 年风险的性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Med. 2019 Jun 13;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12916-019-1340-7.
2
Development and Evaluation of a Mobile Decision Support System for Hypertension Management in the Primary Care Setting in Brazil: Mixed-Methods Field Study on Usability, Feasibility, and Utility.开发和评估一种用于巴西初级保健环境中高血压管理的移动决策支持系统:关于可用性、可行性和实用性的混合方法实地研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 25;7(3):e9869. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9869.
3
多病症管理中数字健康技术的范围综述:机制、结果、挑战与策略
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Mar 15;25(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12548-5.
4
Benefits of Clinical Decision Support Systems for the Management of Noncommunicable Chronic Diseases: Targeted Literature Review.临床决策支持系统在非传染性慢性病管理中的益处:针对性文献综述
Interact J Med Res. 2024 Nov 27;13:e58036. doi: 10.2196/58036.
5
The Role of Telemedicine in Improving Hypertension Management Outcomes: A Systematic Review.远程医疗在改善高血压管理结果中的作用:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2024 Nov 20;16(11):e74090. doi: 10.7759/cureus.74090. eCollection 2024 Nov.
6
General practitioners' user experience of the nationwide digital decision support system in primary care.全科医生对全国基层医疗数字决策支持系统的用户体验
Digit Health. 2024 Sep 5;10:20552076241271816. doi: 10.1177/20552076241271816. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
7
Protocol of digital decision support system (DDSS) embedded within a tele-primary healthcare platform in Pakistan: an assessment of usability, acceptability, effectiveness and perceived quality of care in a resource-constrained setting.嵌入在巴基斯坦远程初级保健平台内的数字决策支持系统(DDSS)方案:在资源有限的环境中评估其可用性、可接受性、有效性和感知护理质量。
BMJ Open. 2024 Sep 5;14(9):e082167. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082167.
8
Epidemiology of cardiometabolic health in Latin America and strategies to address disparities.拉丁美洲心脏代谢健康的流行病学和解决差异的策略。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2024 Dec;21(12):849-864. doi: 10.1038/s41569-024-01058-2. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
9
Motivational drivers for health professionals in a large quality improvement collaborative project in Brazil: a qualitative study.巴西大型质量改进合作项目中卫生专业人员的激励因素:一项定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 9;24(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10678-w.
10
Development and Usability Testing of a Mobile App-Based Clinical Decision Support System for Delirium: Randomized Crossover Trial.基于移动应用的谵妄临床决策支持系统的开发和可用性测试:随机交叉试验。
JMIR Aging. 2024 Jan 24;7:e51264. doi: 10.2196/51264.
Evaluation of clinical decision support systems for diabetes care: An overview of current evidence.
糖尿病护理临床决策支持系统评估:当前证据概述。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2019 Feb;25(1):66-77. doi: 10.1111/jep.12968. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
4
Physician's sociodemographic profile and distribution across public and private health care: an insight into physicians' dual practice in Brazil.医生的社会人口学特征及其在公共和私营医疗保健领域的分布:对巴西医生双重执业情况的洞察。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr 23;18(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3076-z.
5
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师助理学会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年医学会/美国药剂师协会/美国血液学会/美国预防心脏病学会/美国国家医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Hypertension. 2018 Jun;71(6):1269-1324. doi: 10.1161/HYP.0000000000000066. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
6
Therapeutic inertia in the treatment of hyperglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review.2 型糖尿病患者高血糖治疗中的治疗惰性:系统评价。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Feb;20(2):427-437. doi: 10.1111/dom.13088. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
7
Hypertension Management in Brazil: Usual Practice in Primary Care-A Meta-Analysis.巴西的高血压管理:初级保健中的常规做法——一项荟萃分析。
Int J Hypertens. 2017;2017:1274168. doi: 10.1155/2017/1274168. Epub 2017 Jul 2.
8
Strengthening health systems for universal health coverage and sustainable development.加强卫生系统以实现全民健康覆盖和可持续发展。
Bull World Health Organ. 2017 Jul 1;95(7):537-539. doi: 10.2471/BLT.16.187476. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
9
Gaps and barriers in the control of blood glucose in people with type 2 diabetes.2型糖尿病患者血糖控制中的差距与障碍
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2017 May;14(3):172-183. doi: 10.1177/1479164116679775. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A review of contemporary guidance and literature.心血管疾病的一级预防:当代指南与文献综述
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jan 1;6:2048004016687211. doi: 10.1177/2048004016687211. eCollection 2017 Jan-Dec.