Dixon Sharon, Taghinejadi Neda, Duddy Claire, Holloway Flora, Vincent Katy, Ziebland Sue
Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Nuffield Department of Women's Reproductive Health, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Front Reprod Health. 2024 Aug 23;6:1418269. doi: 10.3389/frph.2024.1418269. eCollection 2024.
This Perspectives article reflects on findings from our systematic review about adolescent dysmenorrhoea Q, drawing on sociology of diagnosis theory. We consider tensions and uncertainties between presentation with symptoms of dysmenorrhoea and processes of symptom categorisation and diagnosis in adolescents, tracing these through research and clinical guidance, considering possible implications for clinical practice. We argue that challenges in distinguishing between primary and secondary dysmenorrhoea in research translate into challenges in differentiation in clinical practice. We argue that framing this distinction as clear cut and straightforward belies the well-documented challenges in diagnosis of endometriosis, and that not recognising uncertainty and complexity inherent in this task may benefit neither clinicians nor patients.
这篇观点文章借鉴诊断社会学理论,对我们关于青少年痛经的系统评价结果进行了反思。我们探讨了青少年痛经症状表现与症状分类及诊断过程之间的矛盾和不确定性,并通过研究和临床指南对其进行追溯,同时考虑其对临床实践可能产生的影响。我们认为,研究中区分原发性痛经和继发性痛经的挑战转化为了临床实践中的鉴别难题。我们还认为,将这种区分界定得清晰明了掩盖了子宫内膜异位症诊断中诸多有据可查的挑战,而不认识到这项任务中固有的不确定性和复杂性,对临床医生和患者可能都没有好处。