Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波疗法治疗慢性非插入性跟腱病与慢性插入性跟腱病的疗效比较:一项回顾性研究。

Outcomes After Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Chronic Noninsertional Achilles Tendinopathy Compared With Chronic Insertional Achilles Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Review.

作者信息

Butler James J, DeClouette Brittany, Azam Mohammad T, Walls Raymond C, Jejelava George, Zheng Danny, Jia Nathan, Kennedy John G

机构信息

Foot and Ankle Division, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York USA.

出版信息

Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Sep 4;12(9):23259671241265330. doi: 10.1177/23259671241265330. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is a noninvasive treatment modality that is used in the treatment of chronic Achilles tendinopathy (AT).

PURPOSES

To (1) retrospectively assess outcomes after ESWT for both noninsertional AT (NAT) and insertional AT (IAT) at >1-year follow-up and (2) identify potential predictors of outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent ESWT for AT with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. Data collected and assessed included patient demographic characteristics, pathological characteristics including the location of AT (NAT or IAT), presence of a Haglund deformity, and severity of tendon degeneration on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in addition to treatment characteristics including number of sessions and intensity of ESWT. The Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were obtained before ESWT, 6 months after ESWT, and at final follow-up. Failures were also recorded, which were defined as no improvement in VISA-A or VAS scores or need for surgical intervention. Linear regression was performed to identify potential predictors of inferior subjective clinical outcomes and failures. Survival analysis was conducted using Kaplan-Meier curves.

RESULTS

The study included 52 patients with IAT and 34 patients with NAT. The mean follow-up in the NAT cohort was 22.3 ± 10.2 months and the mean follow-up in the IAT cohort was 26.8 ± 15.8 months. Improvements in VISA-A and VAS scores were observed in the NAT cohort at 6-month follow-up and at final follow-up ( < .05). Improvements in VISA-A and VAS scores were recorded in the IAT cohort at 6-month follow-up, which subsequently deteriorated at final follow-up. In the NAT cohort, the failure rate at 6-month follow-up was 11.8%, which increased to 29.4% at final follow-up. In the IAT cohort, the failure rate at 6-month follow-up was 32.7%, which increased to 59.6% at final follow-up. Predictors of inferior subjective clinical outcomes and failures in the NAT cohort included pre-ESWT subjective clinical score, male sex, presence of a cardiovascular risk factor, and more severe MRI grading of tendinopathy. Predictors of inferior subjective clinical outcomes and failures in the IAT cohort included pre-ESWT subjective clinical score and more severe MRI grading of tendinopathy.

CONCLUSION

Superior subjective clinical outcomes together with a lower failure rate were maintained for >1 year in the NAT cohort compared with the IAT cohort, calling into question the long-term benefit of ESWT for patients with IAT.

摘要

背景

体外冲击波疗法(ESWT)是一种用于治疗慢性跟腱病(AT)的非侵入性治疗方式。

目的

(1)回顾性评估体外冲击波疗法治疗非附着点性跟腱病(NAT)和附着点性跟腱病(IAT)超过1年随访后的疗效,(2)确定疗效的潜在预测因素。

研究设计

队列研究;证据等级,3级。

方法

通过查阅病历确定接受体外冲击波疗法治疗跟腱病且随访至少1年的患者。收集和评估的数据包括患者人口统计学特征、病理特征(包括跟腱病的位置(NAT或IAT)、是否存在Haglund畸形以及磁共振成像(MRI)上肌腱退变的严重程度),以及治疗特征(包括治疗次数和体外冲击波疗法的强度)。在体外冲击波疗法治疗前、治疗后6个月和最终随访时获取维多利亚运动评估-跟腱(VISA-A)和视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分。还记录了治疗失败情况,定义为VISA-A或VAS评分无改善或需要手术干预。进行线性回归以确定主观临床疗效较差和治疗失败的潜在预测因素。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析。

结果

该研究纳入了52例附着点性跟腱病患者和34例非附着点性跟腱病患者。非附着点性跟腱病队列的平均随访时间为22.3±10.2个月,附着点性跟腱病队列的平均随访时间为26.8±15.8个月。在非附着点性跟腱病队列中,6个月随访和最终随访时VISA-A和VAS评分均有改善(P<0.05)。附着点性跟腱病队列在6个月随访时VISA-A和VAS评分有所改善,但在最终随访时有所恶化。在非附着点性跟腱病队列中,6个月随访时的失败率为11.8%,最终随访时增至29.4%。在附着点性跟腱病队列中,6个月随访时的失败率为32.7%,最终随访时增至59.6%。非附着点性跟腱病队列中主观临床疗效较差和治疗失败的预测因素包括体外冲击波疗法治疗前的主观临床评分、男性、存在心血管危险因素以及肌腱病MRI分级更严重。附着点性跟腱病队列中主观临床疗效较差和治疗失败的预测因素包括体外冲击波疗法治疗前的主观临床评分以及肌腱病MRI分级更严重。

结论

与附着点性跟腱病队列相比,非附着点性跟腱病队列在超过1年的时间里保持了更好的主观临床疗效和更低的失败率,这让人质疑体外冲击波疗法对附着点性跟腱病患者的长期益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c4b2/11375648/1f85776730cd/10.1177_23259671241265330-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验