Alkasite restorative material for endodontically treated teeth: a randomized controlled pilot study.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical performance of an alkasite restorative material in molars that had undergone root canal treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The research was registered in Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials. The randomized clinical trial involved 33 patients, each with at least 1 mandibular molar requiring restoration after receiving endodontic treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either bulk-fill resin composite (Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill, Ivoclar Vivadent) or the alkasite restorative material (Cention N, Ivoclar Vivadent). Upon completion of the restorations, 3 calibrated professionals utilized the United States Public Health Service criteria to assess various factors, including retention, secondary caries, marginal adaptation, restoration color, marginal pigmentation, and anatomical form. Evaluations were conducted at intervals of 7 days, 6 months, and 17 months. Additionally, the assessment encompassed the presence of radiolucent lines adjacent to the restoration, material deficiencies or excess, contact points, and caries recurrence. The data underwent analysis using the Friedman and Mann-Whitney tests (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

After 17 months, the results revealed that the alkasite restorative material exhibited greater wear of anatomical shape compared to the bulk-fill resin composite ( = 0.0189). Furthermore, the alkasite restorative material significantly differed from the natural tooth color in most cases ( = 0.0000). However, no other criteria displayed significant differences between the materials or over time ( > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The alkasite restorative material (Cention N) emerges as a viable option for restoring endodontically treated teeth, displaying clinically acceptable alterations after a 17-month evaluation period.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC) Identifier: RBR-97kx5jv.