Seelig M S, Kozinin P J, Goldberg P, Berger A R
Postgrad Med J. 1979 Sep;55(647):632-41. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.55.647.632.
Fungal endocarditis is not rare. It usually develops in patients with abnormal or surgically traumatized hearts, to whose blood fungi have gained access, perhaps during temporary (often iatrogenic) impairment of host defences. Although the blood is cleared rapidly, the fungus can establish itself in the endocardium, where it grows slowly. Thus, clinical and laboratory procedures (including blood and urine cultures) that have permitted early diagnosis and treatment of bacterial endocarditis, are not reliable in early fungal endocarditis. Greater reliance must be placed on serological monitoring of patients who have had transient fungaemia and are at risk of endocarditis. The clinician must consider factors that enhance fungal proliferation and invasion and be cognizant of its dangers - even in the absence of clear signs of infection. Prophylactic measures should be employed to protect the patient at risk, including topical, oral and systemic use of appropriate antifungal agents. Early therapy, the extent and duration of which can be determined by (1) obtaining the MIC of transitory blood or urine isolates - which should not be ignored - and (2) monitoring serology, might eliminate early invaders of the endocardium. Sixty-four reported cures of fungal endocarditis caused by the most common fungal pathogen, are tabulated, 29 were of classic fungal endocarditis requiring surgery, 3 of whom were seen later by others as fatal recurrences. Those treated early (shortly after candidaemia was diagnosed - mostly in patients on treatment for bacterial endocarditis or after cardiac surgery) survived without need for surgical removal of vegetations or valve replacement. Despite strong suggestive evidence that the first 35 patients tabulated had fungal endocarditis, histological proof exists for only a few who had surgery. Cures of endocarditis caused by other fungi are noted. Improved surgical and medical therapy has improved the prognosis even of patients with the far-advanced disease. However, development of classic fungal endocarditis has been reported one or more years after cardiac surgery and late recurrences after intensive therapy of fungal endocarditis, that had led to clinical recovery of 2 years or more, have been reported. Serological monitoring of vulnerable patients might alert the physician to recurrence early enough for efficacy of drug therapy, averting fatal outcome or the need for further surgery.
真菌性心内膜炎并不罕见。它通常发生在心脏异常或受过手术创伤的患者身上,真菌可能在宿主防御功能暂时(通常是医源性)受损期间进入其血液。尽管血液能迅速清除真菌,但真菌可在心内膜定植并缓慢生长。因此,那些能实现细菌性心内膜炎早期诊断和治疗的临床及实验室检查程序(包括血培养和尿培养),在真菌性心内膜炎早期并不可靠。对于曾有短暂真菌血症且有患心内膜炎风险的患者,必须更依赖血清学监测。临床医生必须考虑促进真菌增殖和侵袭的因素,并意识到其危险性——即使在没有明确感染迹象的情况下。应采取预防措施保护有风险的患者,包括局部、口服和全身使用合适的抗真菌药物。早期治疗的范围和持续时间可由以下因素确定:(1)获取短暂性血液或尿液分离株的最低抑菌浓度——这一点不容忽视;(2)监测血清学,这样或许能清除早期的心内膜入侵者。文中列出了由最常见真菌病原体引起的64例真菌性心内膜炎治愈病例,其中29例为典型真菌性心内膜炎,需要进行手术,其中3例后来被其他人视为致命复发。那些早期接受治疗的患者(在念珠菌血症被诊断后不久——大多是正在接受细菌性心内膜炎治疗的患者或心脏手术后的患者)存活下来,无需手术切除赘生物或更换瓣膜。尽管有强有力的提示性证据表明表格列出的前35例患者患有真菌性心内膜炎,但只有少数接受手术的患者有组织学证据。文中还提到了由其他真菌引起的心内膜炎的治愈情况。改进后的手术和药物治疗改善了即使是病情严重患者的预后。然而,有报道称在心脏手术后一年或多年发生了典型真菌性心内膜炎,并且有报道称在真菌性心内膜炎强化治疗后出现了晚期复发,而此前该疾病已实现了两年或更长时间的临床康复。对易感患者进行血清学监测可能会足够早地提醒医生复发情况,以便药物治疗有效,避免致命后果或避免进一步手术的需要。