Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Postbus 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Europace. 2024 Oct 3;26(10). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae232.
Both isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation techniques have demonstrated favourable outcomes in the management of patients with (long-standing) persistent AF, as compared with catheter ablation. However, it is currently unknown whether there is a difference in short- and long-term outcomes when comparing these two minimally invasive surgical AF ablation procedures. Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to investigate these two techniques, with a specific emphasis on long-term freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmias (ATAs).
A systematic search through PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases was performed. All studies reporting on short-term outcomes were included in the meta-analysis. A pooled analysis of long-term freedom from ATA was performed based on Kaplan-Meier (KM) curve-derived individual patient data. Reconstructed individual time-to-event data were analysed in a multivariable Cox frailty model with adjustments for age, sex, type of AF, duration of AF history, and study variable (frailty term in the frailty Cox model). In total, 53 studies were included in the meta-analysis, encompassing 4950 patients. There were no differences in major short-term outcomes (mortality or stroke) between isolated thoracoscopic and hybrid thoracoscopic ablation. A total of 18 studies reported KM curves for long-term freedom from ATA, comprising 2038 patients. Adjusted analysis revealed that hybrid ablation was significantly associated with greater freedom from ATA [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.43-0.83, P < 0.001] compared with isolated thoracoscopic ablation. Additionally, older age (aHR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03-1.12, P = 0.002) and a higher percentage of male patients (aHR = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with lower long-term freedom from ATA recurrence.
Hybrid thoracoscopic AF ablation is associated with a greater long-term freedom from ATA when compared with isolated thoracoscopic ablation, without differences in complications.
与导管消融相比,孤立胸腔镜和杂交胸腔镜心房颤动(AF)消融技术在管理(持续性)持续性 AF 患者方面均显示出良好的效果。然而,目前尚不清楚比较这两种微创外科 AF 消融程序时,短期和长期结果是否存在差异。因此,进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以研究这两种技术,特别强调长期无心房性心动过速(ATAs)。
通过 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库进行了系统搜索。纳入了所有报告短期结果的研究进行荟萃分析。基于 Kaplan-Meier(KM)曲线衍生的个体患者数据,对长期无 ATA 自由进行了汇总分析。使用多变量 Cox 脆弱模型对重建的个体时间事件数据进行了分析,并对年龄、性别、AF 类型、AF 病史持续时间和研究变量(脆弱 Cox 模型中的脆弱术语)进行了调整。共有 53 项研究纳入荟萃分析,共纳入 4950 例患者。孤立胸腔镜和杂交胸腔镜消融在主要短期结局(死亡率或卒)方面无差异。共有 18 项研究报告了长期无 ATA 的 KM 曲线,共纳入 2038 例患者。调整分析显示,与孤立胸腔镜消融相比,杂交消融显著与 ATA 无复发相关更大[调整后的危险比(aHR)=0.59,95%置信区间(CI):0.43-0.83,P<0.001]。此外,年龄较大(aHR=1.07,95%CI:1.03-1.12,P=0.002)和男性患者比例较高(aHR=1.02,95%CI:1.01-1.03,P<0.001)与长期 ATA 无复发的几率较低显著相关。
与孤立胸腔镜消融相比,杂交胸腔镜 AF 消融与长期 ATA 无复发相关,而并发症无差异。