Department of Ultrasonography, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Youyi Rd 1, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Department of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Youyi Rd 1, Chongqing, 400042, China.
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 9;14(1):21072. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71776-7.
Controversy still exists regarding how much the inflow arterial percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) contributed to maintaining fistula function for hemodialysis. We aimed to analyze patency and risk factors after inflow arterial PTA. Hemodialysis patients with inflow arterial primary stenosis who were admitted to our institution from January 2017 to December 2022 were examined. One group had arterial-venous fistula with inflow artery stenosis alone (AVF + iAS) and another group had AVF with inflow artery stenosis and any vein stenosis (AVF + iAS + VS). The characteristics of patients, stenotic lesions, and PTA procedures were recorded. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare primary patency, assisted primary patency, and secondary patency in the two groups. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to identify risk factors associated with patency. We examined 213 patients, 53 in the AVF + iAS group (51 radial arterial stenosis and 2 ulnar arterial stenosis) and 160 in the AVF + iAS + VS group (159 radial arterial stenosis and 1 ulnar arterial stenosis). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated the AVF + iAS group had better primary patency and assisted primary patency (both P < 0.05), but the groups had similar secondary patency. Cox proportional hazard analysis indicated that none of the analyzed clinical and biochemical indexes had clinically meaningful effects on primary patency, assisted primary patency, or secondary patency in either group. The patency and safety after PTA for inflow arterial stenosis were satisfactory, and none of the examined risk factors had a major clinical impact on patency. We recommend PTA as treatment for inflow stenosis of an AVF.
关于经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)对维持血液透析瘘功能的贡献有多少仍存在争议。我们旨在分析流入动脉 PTA 后的通畅性和相关危险因素。
选取 2017 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间因流入动脉原发性狭窄而在我院就诊的血液透析患者,纳入研究。一组患者为单纯流入动脉狭窄的动静脉内瘘(AVF+iAS),另一组患者为存在流入动脉狭窄和任何静脉狭窄的 AVF(AVF+iAS+VS)。记录患者、狭窄病变和 PTA 手术的特征。Kaplan-Meier 分析用于比较两组患者的初始通畅率、辅助初始通畅率和次级通畅率。Cox 比例风险分析用于识别与通畅性相关的危险因素。
我们共检查了 213 例患者,53 例在 AVF+iAS 组(51 例桡动脉狭窄和 2 例尺动脉狭窄),160 例在 AVF+iAS+VS 组(159 例桡动脉狭窄和 1 例尺动脉狭窄)。Kaplan-Meier 分析表明 AVF+iAS 组的初始通畅率和辅助初始通畅率较好(均 P<0.05),但两组的次级通畅率相似。Cox 比例风险分析表明,两组中没有任何分析的临床和生化指标对初始通畅率、辅助初始通畅率或次级通畅率有明显的临床意义。流入动脉狭窄 PTA 后的通畅性和安全性令人满意,检查的危险因素对两组的通畅性均无重大临床影响。我们建议将 PTA 作为治疗 AVF 流入狭窄的方法。