• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监狱警卫和法医护理领域心理健康工作者的不同观点。

Different perspectives of prison guards and mental health workers in forensic care.

作者信息

Timar Jasvant, Buurman Evi, Westen Koen, Delespaul Philippe

机构信息

Reinier van Arkel, s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands.

GGZ Breburg, Breda, Netherlands.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 27;15:1420565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420565. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420565
PMID:39257408
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11385686/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study investigates the differences in treatment perspectives of prison guards and mental health practitioners within a Psychiatric Prison Unit (PPU).

METHODS

This qualitative study uses questionnaires and focus groups to explore the relationships between prison guards ( = 4) and mental health professionals ( = 6) working at the Psychiatric Prison Unit in Zwolle, the Netherlands. Two questionnaires (the Recovery Attitude Questionnaire and the Recovery Knowledge Inventory) were completed by the participants. A selected subsample based on diverging beliefs concerning treatment perspectives was recruited for additional focus groups. The dialogues were transcribed and coded into a comprehensive scheme. Responses were analyzed to describe perceptions and attitudes of respondents towards forensic care.

RESULTS

This study identified three main themes: policy, communication, and person-dependent factors. Understaffing and high turnover rates in the correctional facility led to prioritization of safety concerns over treatment objectives. Guards and mental health professionals had different communication styles which hindered the alignment of treatment goals. Person-dependent factors, including personality traits and individual attributes, were significant in shaping collaborative interactions.

CONCLUSION

This study reveals agreement in the viewpoints between prison guards and mental health professionals but highlights the complex challenges in providing effective treatment within the confines of a correctional facility. These challenges are influenced by policy dynamics, communication limitations, and individual-specific factors.

摘要

目的

本研究调查了精神病监狱单元(PPU)中狱警和心理健康从业者在治疗观点上的差异。

方法

这项定性研究使用问卷和焦点小组来探索在荷兰兹沃勒的精神病监狱单元工作的狱警(n = 4)和心理健康专业人员(n = 6)之间的关系。参与者完成了两份问卷(康复态度问卷和康复知识量表)。基于对治疗观点的不同信念,选取了一个子样本参加额外的焦点小组。对话被转录并编码成一个综合方案。对回答进行分析,以描述受访者对法医护理的看法和态度。

结果

本研究确定了三个主要主题:政策、沟通和个人相关因素。惩教设施人员不足和高离职率导致安全问题优先于治疗目标。狱警和心理健康专业人员有不同的沟通方式,这阻碍了治疗目标的一致。个人相关因素,包括性格特征和个人属性,在塑造协作互动方面具有重要意义。

结论

本研究揭示了狱警和心理健康专业人员在观点上的一致性,但突出了在惩教设施范围内提供有效治疗的复杂挑战。这些挑战受到政策动态、沟通限制和个人特定因素的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/11385686/315308a23991/fpsyg-15-1420565-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/11385686/65292ebf93dd/fpsyg-15-1420565-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/11385686/0c8f76fbed7e/fpsyg-15-1420565-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/11385686/76129b77f144/fpsyg-15-1420565-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/11385686/315308a23991/fpsyg-15-1420565-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/11385686/65292ebf93dd/fpsyg-15-1420565-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/11385686/0c8f76fbed7e/fpsyg-15-1420565-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/11385686/76129b77f144/fpsyg-15-1420565-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74fd/11385686/315308a23991/fpsyg-15-1420565-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Different perspectives of prison guards and mental health workers in forensic care.监狱警卫和法医护理领域心理健康工作者的不同观点。
Front Psychol. 2024 Aug 27;15:1420565. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420565. eCollection 2024.
2
[Burnout and victimisation: impact of inmates' aggression towards prison guards].职业倦怠与受侵害:囚犯对狱警攻击行为的影响
Encephale. 2011 Sep;37(4):284-92. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2010.08.006. Epub 2010 Oct 18.
3
Impact of psychoeducation on professional stress reduction among prison guards.心理教育对狱警职业压力缓解的影响。
Mater Sociomed. 2009;21(1):24-6. doi: 10.5455/msm.2009.21.24-26.
4
Managing pain in prison: staff perspectives.监狱中的疼痛管理:工作人员的观点
Int J Prison Health. 2014;10(3):198-208. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-08-2013-0037.
5
Multi-Level Barriers to Prison Mental Health and Physical Health Care for Individuals With Mental Illnesses.患有精神疾病的个体在监狱中获得心理健康和身体健康护理面临的多层次障碍。
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 3;13:777124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.777124. eCollection 2022.
6
Challenges for people with intellectual disabilities in law enforcement interactions in Ireland; thematic analysis informed by 1537 person-years' experience.爱尔兰执法互动中智障人士面临的挑战;基于 1537 人年经验的主题分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;75:101683. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101683. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
7
Mental Health in Prison: Integrating the Perspectives of Prison Staff.监狱中的心理健康:整合监狱工作人员的观点。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 26;18(21):11254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111254.
8
Key successes and challenges in providing mental health care in an urban male remand prison: a qualitative study.城市男性还押监狱提供心理健康护理的关键成功因素与挑战:一项定性研究
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2016 Apr;51(4):589-96. doi: 10.1007/s00127-016-1170-2. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
9
Forensic-Psychiatric Risk Evaluations: Perspectives of Forensic Psychiatric Experts and Older Incarcerated Persons From Switzerland.法医精神病学风险评估:瑞士法医精神病学专家和老年被监禁者的观点
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 14;12:643096. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643096. eCollection 2021.
10
Forensic-Correctional Psychiatric Services in Abu Dhabi: Lessons From a Descriptive Analyis of the Attributes of a Sample of Service Users.阿布扎比的法医矫正精神科服务:对服务使用者样本属性的描述性分析所得经验教训
Psychiatr Danub. 2022 Winter;34(4):635-643. doi: 10.24869/psyd.2022.635.

本文引用的文献

1
Let's Work Together - Occupational Factors and Their Correlates to Prison Climate and Inmates' Attitudes Towards Treatment.携手合作——职业因素及其与监狱环境和囚犯对治疗态度的关联
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 29;10:781. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00781. eCollection 2019.
2
Severe mental illness and substance use disorders in prisoners in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence studies.中低收入国家囚犯中的严重精神疾病和物质使用障碍:患病率研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Apr;7(4):e461-e471. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30539-4.
3
Longing for Integrated Care: The Importance of Effective Governance.
对综合医疗服务的渴望:有效治理的重要性。
Int J Integr Care. 2017 Oct 2;17(4):10. doi: 10.5334/ijic.3510.
4
Treatment of psychosis in prisons and violent recidivism.监狱中精神病的治疗与暴力累犯
BJPsych Open. 2015 Nov 9;1(2):149-157. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.000257. eCollection 2015 Oct.
5
Offenders with mental illness have criminogenic needs, too: toward recidivism reduction.患有精神疾病的罪犯也有导致犯罪的需求:旨在减少累犯。
Law Hum Behav. 2014 Jun;38(3):212-24. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000054. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
6
Psychotic disorders and repeat offending: systematic review and meta-analysis.精神病障碍与再次犯罪:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2011 Jul;37(4):800-10. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp135. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
7
A model and typology of collaboration between professionals in healthcare organizations.医疗保健组织中专业人员之间合作的模型与类型学
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Sep 21;8:188. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-188.
8
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.
9
Understanding and preventing criminal recidivism among adults with psychotic disorders.了解并预防患有精神疾病的成年人再次犯罪。
Psychiatr Serv. 2007 Jun;58(6):773-81. doi: 10.1176/ps.2007.58.6.773.
10
Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.定性内容分析的三种方法。
Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.