• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过中线导管和外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管接受刺激性静脉用抗菌药物或血管加压药的患者并发症类型的比较。

Comparison of complication types in patients receiving vesicant intravenous antimicrobials or vasopressors via midlines and peripherally inserted central catheters.

作者信息

Grigg Bryan, Varghese Nishant, Knapp Christi, Shay Sabra L, Jones Geraldine, Herlihy James P, Manian Prasad, Lembcke Bradley, Al Mohajer Mayar

机构信息

Baylor College of Medicine, School of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 5;4(1):e116. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.363. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1017/ash.2024.363
PMID:39257429
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11384157/
Abstract

We assessed adverse events in hospitalized patients receiving selected vesicant antibiotics or vasopressors administered through midline catheters or peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). The rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections, thrombosis, and overall events were similar across the two groups, while occlusion was higher in the PICC group.

摘要

我们评估了通过中线导管或外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管（PICC）接受特定刺激性抗生素或血管加压药治疗的住院患者的不良事件。两组的导管相关血流感染、血栓形成和总体事件发生率相似，而PICC组的堵塞发生率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab3/11384157/abbf6ccfd49e/S2732494X24003632_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab3/11384157/abbf6ccfd49e/S2732494X24003632_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab3/11384157/abbf6ccfd49e/S2732494X24003632_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of complication types in patients receiving vesicant intravenous antimicrobials or vasopressors via midlines and peripherally inserted central catheters.通过中线导管和外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管接受刺激性静脉用抗菌药物或血管加压药的患者并发症类型的比较。
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 5;4(1):e116. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.363. eCollection 2024.
2
The Association of Vasopressor Administration through a Midline Catheter with Catheter-related Complications.中线导管给药与导管相关并发症的关联。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Jul;20(7):1003-1011. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202209-814OC.
3
PICC versus midlines: Comparison of peripherally inserted central catheters and midline catheters with respect to incidence of thromboembolic and infectious complications.经外周静脉穿刺中心静脉置管（PICC）与中置线：血栓栓塞和感染并发症发生率方面的外周插入中心导管（PICC）与中置线的比较。
Am J Surg. 2022 May;223(5):983-987. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2021.09.029. Epub 2021 Sep 25.
4
Safety and Outcomes of Midline Catheters vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters for Patients With Short-term Indications: A Multicenter Study.短期适应证患者中线导管与经外周置入中心静脉导管安全性和结局的多中心研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jan 1;182(1):50-58. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6844.
5
Patterns of use and outcomes of peripherally inserted central catheters in hospitalized patients with solid tumors: A multicenter study.住院固体肿瘤患者中经外周插入中心静脉导管的使用模式和结局：一项多中心研究。
Cancer. 2022 Oct;128(20):3681-3690. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34410. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
6
The safety and efficacy of midlines compared to peripherally inserted central catheters for adult cystic fibrosis patients: a retrospective, observational study.成人囊性纤维化患者中线导管与外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的安全性和有效性：一项回顾性观察研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2014 May;51(5):694-702. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2013.09.002. Epub 2013 Sep 14.
7
Comparing Complication Rates of Midline Catheter vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.比较中线导管与外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的并发症发生率。一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 18;10(2):ofad024. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad024. eCollection 2023 Feb.
8
Antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters for preventing neonatal bloodstream infection: the PREVAIL RCT.抗菌浸渍中央静脉导管预防新生儿血流感染：PREVAIL RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(57):1-190. doi: 10.3310/hta24570.
9
Peripherally inserted central catheter design and material for reducing catheter failure and complications.用于减少导管故障和并发症的外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管的设计与材料
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 28;6(6):CD013366. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013366.pub2.
10
Comparison of complication rates and incidences associated with different peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective cohort study.比较不同外周置入中心静脉导管（PICC）在血液病患者中相关并发症发生率和发病率：一项回顾性队列研究。
Leuk Lymphoma. 2020 Jan;61(1):156-164. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1646908. Epub 2019 Aug 7.

本文引用的文献

1
The Association of Vasopressor Administration through a Midline Catheter with Catheter-related Complications.中线导管给药与导管相关并发症的关联。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Jul;20(7):1003-1011. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202209-814OC.
2
Comparing Complication Rates of Midline Catheter vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.比较中线导管与外周静脉置入中心静脉导管的并发症发生率。一项系统评价与Meta分析。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 18;10(2):ofad024. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofad024. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
Safety and Outcomes of Midline Catheters vs Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters for Patients With Short-term Indications: A Multicenter Study.
短期适应证患者中线导管与经外周置入中心静脉导管安全性和结局的多中心研究。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jan 1;182(1):50-58. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6844.
4
Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice, 8th Edition.《输液治疗实践标准》第8版
J Infus Nurs. 2021;44(1S Suppl 1):S1-S224. doi: 10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396.
5
Safety and efficacy of vasopressor administration through midline catheters.通过中线导管给予血管加压药的安全性和有效性。
J Crit Care. 2021 Feb;61:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.024. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
6
The 2016 Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice.《2016年静脉输液治疗实践标准》
Home Healthc Now. 2017 Jan;35(1):10-18. doi: 10.1097/NHH.0000000000000481.
7
The risk of bloodstream infection associated with peripherally inserted central catheters compared with central venous catheters in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.成人外周静脉置入中心静脉导管与中心静脉导管相关血流感染风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2013 Sep;34(9):908-18. doi: 10.1086/671737. Epub 2013 Jul 26.
8
Peripherally inserted central venous catheters are not superior to central venous catheters in the acute care of surgical patients on the ward.在外周置入中心静脉导管在病房对外科手术患者的急性护理中并不优于中心静脉导管。
World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1605-19. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0174-y.