Suppr超能文献

通过中线导管和外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管接受刺激性静脉用抗菌药物或血管加压药的患者并发症类型的比较。

Comparison of complication types in patients receiving vesicant intravenous antimicrobials or vasopressors via midlines and peripherally inserted central catheters.

作者信息

Grigg Bryan, Varghese Nishant, Knapp Christi, Shay Sabra L, Jones Geraldine, Herlihy James P, Manian Prasad, Lembcke Bradley, Al Mohajer Mayar

机构信息

Baylor College of Medicine, School of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.

Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Sep 5;4(1):e116. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.363. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

We assessed adverse events in hospitalized patients receiving selected vesicant antibiotics or vasopressors administered through midline catheters or peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC). The rates of catheter-related bloodstream infections, thrombosis, and overall events were similar across the two groups, while occlusion was higher in the PICC group.

摘要

我们评估了通过中线导管或外周静脉穿刺中心静脉导管(PICC)接受特定刺激性抗生素或血管加压药治疗的住院患者的不良事件。两组的导管相关血流感染、血栓形成和总体事件发生率相似,而PICC组的堵塞发生率更高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eab3/11384157/abbf6ccfd49e/S2732494X24003632_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验