Drummond J C, Prutow R J, Scheller M S
Anesth Analg. 1985 Jul;64(7):688-92.
The authors sought to define the relative sensitivities of endtidal carbon dioxide analysis (ETCO2), end-tidal nitrogen analysis (ETN2), and pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitoring in the detection of venous air embolism (VAE). Serial injections of air (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, and 1.5 ml/kg) were performed in six mongrel dogs. The frequency with which positive responses (PAP increase greater than 2 mm Hg; ETCO2 decrease greater than 0.2%; ETN2 increase greater than 0.04%) were observed following VAE was not different for the three methods. The response time (time to maximum change following VAE) was significantly more rapid for PAP and ETN2 than for ETCO2; although the range for the three methods was narrow, e.g., for 1.5 ml/kg--PAP, 0.92 +/- 0.7 (SD) min; ETN2, 1.20 +/- 0.5 min; ETCO2, 1.85 +/- 0.7 min. The time from injection of air to return to baseline levels was significantly more rapid for ETN2 than for ETCO2 which was in turn significantly faster than PAP, e.g., for 1.5 ml/kg--ETN2, 8.0 +/- 4.3 min; ETCO2, 19.4 +/- 6.0 min; PAP, 23.8 +/- 6.1 min. The results indicate that, where the capacity to identify increases in expired nitrogen on the order of 0.04% can be achieved, ETN2 monitoring will identify VAE events with a sensitivity similar to that of PAP and ETCO2. However, the difficulties inherent in achieving this level of nitrogen detection sensitivity probably represent a current major limitation in the application of this method. Furthermore, the data indicate that, after VAE, ETN2 will return to preinjection levels although PAP and ETCO2 remain abnormal. This observation suggests that ETN2 may not be a reliable indicator of recovery from the physiologic impact of VAE, and may therefore not be the optimum method to base decisions regarding resumption of the head-up posture and continuation of surgery during procedures in which VAE has occurred.
作者试图确定呼气末二氧化碳分析(ETCO2)、呼气末氮气分析(ETN2)和肺动脉压(PAP)监测在检测静脉空气栓塞(VAE)方面的相对敏感性。对6只杂种狗进行了系列空气注射(0.25、0.5、0.75、1.0和1.5 ml/kg)。对于这三种方法,VAE后观察到阳性反应(PAP升高大于2 mmHg;ETCO2降低大于0.2%;ETN2升高大于0.04%)的频率没有差异。PAP和ETN2的反应时间(VAE后达到最大变化的时间)比ETCO2显著更快;尽管这三种方法的范围较窄,例如,对于1.5 ml/kg——PAP为0.92±0.7(标准差)分钟;ETN2为1.20±0.5分钟;ETCO2为1.85±0.7分钟。从注射空气到恢复到基线水平的时间,ETN2比ETCO2显著更快,而ETCO2又比PAP显著更快,例如,对于1.5 ml/kg——ETN2为8.0±4.3分钟;ETCO2为19.4±6.0分钟;PAP为23.8±6.1分钟。结果表明,在能够实现识别呼出氮气增加约0.04%的能力的情况下,ETN2监测识别VAE事件的敏感性与PAP和ETCO2相似。然而,达到这种氮气检测敏感性水平所固有的困难可能是该方法目前应用中的一个主要限制。此外,数据表明,VAE后,ETN2将恢复到注射前水平,尽管PAP和ETCO2仍异常。这一观察结果表明,ETN2可能不是VAE生理影响恢复的可靠指标,因此可能不是在发生VAE的手术过程中决定恢复头高位姿势和继续手术的最佳方法。