Chai Rong, Jiang Xinpei, Ma Ruixia, Zhang Qiang, Yang E, Zhang Ansheng
Department of Stomatology, Xi'an International Medical Center Hospital Affiliated to Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710077, P.R. China.
Medical College, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, Hunan 410208, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2024 Aug 28;28(5):411. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12700. eCollection 2024 Nov.
A fractured instrument (FI) in the root canal is a common complication during root canal therapy. Under current medical conditions, instrument separation cannot be completely avoided because of the complex morphology of root canals and the limited surgical field and operating space of the surgeon. FIs, especially those broken in the apical third of the canal, render it difficult to completely remove infection in the root canal, where the residual infection can easily develop into reinfection. The removal of FIs is therefore the preferred option for the majority of clinicians in such cases. However, root canal preparation instruments are frequently fractured during treatment because of the complex root canal morphology, such as curvature or severe calcification, which further increases the difficulty of instrument removal. In the present case, a 41-year-old female patient complained of worsening pain in the left maxillary first molar for 3 days. This patient had been treated at another hospital 2 years earlier, but the discomfort persisted after treatment. Preoperative periapical radiography revealed suspected FIs at the apical third of the mesiobuccal (MB) root and the middle third of the distal buccal (DB) root, underfilling of the palatal (P) root canal and large hypodense areas surrounding the periapical region of all roots. Next, the micro-ultrasound technique was used to remove the FI in the DB canal; a bypass through the second MB canal (MB2) was created to fill the apical stop of the MB root and the P canal was retreated. The therapeutic effect of the bypass technique was assessed by comparing bypass treatment and removal treatment for endodontic FIs. The 9-month and 27-month follow-ups revealed that the periapical inflammation surrounding the DB root treated after removal of the FI and the MB root treated by bypass was significantly controlled compared with that before the operation. In addition, the present report reviewed the research progress in bypass and removal techniques, focusing on the difficulties and key points of successful root canal therapy.
根管内器械折断是根管治疗过程中常见的并发症。在当前医疗条件下,由于根管形态复杂以及术者手术视野和操作空间有限,器械分离无法完全避免。器械折断,尤其是发生在根管根尖三分之一处的折断,使得彻底清除根管内感染变得困难,残余感染很容易发展为再感染。因此,在这种情况下,取出折断器械是大多数临床医生的首选方案。然而,由于根管形态复杂,如弯曲或严重钙化,根管预备器械在治疗过程中经常折断,这进一步增加了器械取出的难度。在本病例中,一名41岁女性患者主诉左上颌第一磨牙疼痛加剧3天。该患者2年前曾在另一家医院接受治疗,但治疗后不适症状仍持续存在。术前根尖片显示,近中颊根(MB)根尖三分之一处和远中颊根(DB)中三分之一处疑似器械折断,腭根(P)根管欠填,所有牙根根尖周区域周围有大片低密度区。接下来,采用微超声技术取出DB根管内的折断器械;通过第二近中颊根管(MB2)建立旁路,以充填MB根的根尖止点,并对P根管进行再治疗。通过比较根管内折断器械的旁路治疗和取出治疗,评估旁路技术的治疗效果。9个月和27个月的随访显示,与手术前相比,取出折断器械后治疗的DB根和采用旁路治疗的MB根周围的根尖炎症得到了显著控制。此外,本报告回顾了旁路和取出技术的研究进展,重点关注成功进行根管治疗的难点和关键点。