• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同根管冲洗技术在折断器械根尖区的蒸汽泡动力学及清洁效果比较

Comparison of vapor bubble kinetics and cleaning efficacy of different root canal irrigation techniques in the apical area beyond the fractured instrument.

作者信息

Liu Jiayi, Watanabe Satoshi, Mochizuki Sota, Kouno Akira, Okiji Takashi

机构信息

Department of Pulp Biology and Endodontics, Division of Oral Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University (TMDU), Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Dent Sci. 2023 Jul;18(3):1141-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.10.032. Epub 2022 Nov 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jds.2022.10.032
PMID:37404607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10316448/
Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Intracanal fractured instruments hamper adequate root canal disinfection. The aim of this study was to evaluate vapor bubble kinetics and cleaning efficacy of different irrigation techniques in the apical area beyond the fractured instrument.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty curved root canal models, in which a 3-mm fragment of a #20 K-file or a WaveOne Gold Primary (WOG) instrument was intentionally separated at 3 mm from the apical foramen, were irrigated with laser-activated irrigation with photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (LAI-PIPS; 20 mJ/15 Hz), laser-activated irrigation using an Er:YAG laser unit (LAI; 30 mJ/20 Hz), or ultrasonic-activated irrigation (UAI) for 5 s. Vapor bubble velocity and counts were analyzed using high-speed video imaging. To evaluate canal wall cleanliness, 40 canals of extracted human teeth with an intentionally separated 3-mm WOG fragment in the canal at 3 mm from the apical foramen were irrigated with LAI-PIPS, LAI, UAI or conventional syringe irrigation, using 17% EDTA (30 s, two cycles), saline (30 s), and 3% NaOCl (30 s, three cycles) as irrigants. Debris and smear layer on the apical canal wall beyond the fractured instrument were scored using scanning electron microscopy.

RESULTS

LAI-PIPS and LAI demonstrated higher vapor bubble counts than UAI. The WOG fragment permitted higher bubble velocity and count than the K-file fragment. LAI-PIPS and LAI showed better debris and smear removal than the other techniques.

CONCLUSION

LAI and LAI-PIPS demonstrated higher vaporized bubble kinetics and better cleaning efficacy in the apical area, even in the presence of a fractured instrument.

摘要

背景/目的:根管内折断器械妨碍根管充分消毒。本研究的目的是评估不同冲洗技术在折断器械根尖区的气泡动力学和清洁效果。

材料与方法

制作60个弯曲根管模型,将#20 K锉或WaveOne Gold Primary(WOG)器械的3mm片段在距根尖孔3mm处故意折断,分别采用光子诱导光声流激光激活冲洗(LAI-PIPS;20 mJ/15 Hz)、使用铒激光装置的激光激活冲洗(LAI;30 mJ/20 Hz)或超声激活冲洗(UAI)冲洗5秒。使用高速视频成像分析气泡速度和数量。为评估根管壁清洁度,选取40颗拔除的人牙,根管内距根尖孔3mm处故意折断一个3mm的WOG片段,分别用LAI-PIPS、LAI、UAI或传统注射器冲洗,冲洗液分别为17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA,30秒,两个循环)、生理盐水(30秒)和3%次氯酸钠(30秒,三个循环)。使用扫描电子显微镜对折断器械根尖区根管壁上的碎屑和玷污层进行评分。

结果

LAI-PIPS和LAI产生的气泡数量高于UAI。WOG片段比K锉片段产生的气泡速度更高、数量更多。LAI-PIPS和LAI在清除碎屑和玷污层方面比其他技术效果更好。

结论

即使存在折断器械,LAI和LAI-PIPS在根尖区也表现出更高的汽化气泡动力学和更好的清洁效果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/f92d738630ca/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/b57daeace828/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/3404e7554f37/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/1c7d9fdd90f3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/f0ba31966657/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/f92d738630ca/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/b57daeace828/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/3404e7554f37/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/1c7d9fdd90f3/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/f0ba31966657/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a18/10316448/f92d738630ca/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of vapor bubble kinetics and cleaning efficacy of different root canal irrigation techniques in the apical area beyond the fractured instrument.不同根管冲洗技术在折断器械根尖区的蒸汽泡动力学及清洁效果比较
J Dent Sci. 2023 Jul;18(3):1141-1147. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.10.032. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
2
Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigation techniques in conservatively instrumented root canals.不同冲洗技术在保守预备根管中对玷污层的去除效果
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1546-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
3
The efficacy of ultrasonic and PIPS (photon-induced acoustic streaming) irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris plugs out of an artificial and natural root model.超声联合 PIPS(光致声流)冲洗去除人工和天然根管模型中人工放置牙本质碎屑堵塞的效果。
Lasers Med Sci. 2020 Apr;35(3):719-728. doi: 10.1007/s10103-019-02912-3. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
4
Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation in Comparison with Different Irrigation Systems for Cleaning the Apical Root Canal Area Beyond Ledge.铒:钇铝石榴石激光激活冲洗与不同冲洗系统在清除牙本质肩领处根尖牙本质内的比较。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2021 Dec;39(12):759-765. doi: 10.1089/photob.2021.0044. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
5
Fluid Movement in the Apical Area Beyond the Ledge During Er:YAG Laser-Activated Irrigation: A Particle Image Velocimetry Analysis.激光激活冲洗时牙本质表面边缘下区域的流固运动:粒子图像 velocimetry 分析。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020 Jul;38(7):438-443. doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4758.
6
Efficacy of Smear Layer Removal at the Apical One-Third of the Root Using Different Protocols of Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) Laser.不同protocol 的铒激光(Er:YAG)对根尖 1/3 牙本质表面玷污层去除效果的研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Feb 22;59(3):433. doi: 10.3390/medicina59030433.
7
Effect of Pulse Energy, Pulse Frequency, and Tip Diameter on Intracanal Vaporized Bubble Kinetics and Apical Pressure During Laser-Activated Irrigation Using Er:YAG Laser.脉冲能量、脉冲频率和尖端直径对 Er:YAG 激光激活冲洗时根管内汽化气泡动力学和根尖压的影响。
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2020 Jul;38(7):431-437. doi: 10.1089/photob.2019.4739. Epub 2020 May 4.
8
Comparison of the antibacterial effect and smear layer removal using photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming aided irrigation versus a conventional irrigation in single-rooted canals: an in vitro study.单根根管中光子引发光声流辅助冲洗与传统冲洗的抗菌效果及玷污层去除比较:一项体外研究
Photomed Laser Surg. 2013 Aug;31(8):371-7. doi: 10.1089/pho.2013.3515. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
9
Antibacterial and Smear Layer Removal Efficacy of Er:YAG Laser Irradiation by Photon-Induced Photoacoustic Streaming in Primary Molar Root Canals: A Preliminary Study.铒钇铝石榴石激光通过光子诱导光声流对乳磨牙根管进行抗菌及去除玷污层的疗效:一项初步研究
Photomed Laser Surg. 2018 Sep;36(9):480-486. doi: 10.1089/pho.2017.4369. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
10
Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument.比较三种冲洗方法:SWEET、超声和传统冲洗,在去除根管内碎片和玷污层方面的能力,超出折断器械。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Mar;37:102707. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102707. Epub 2021 Dec 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Cleaning efficacy and apical pressure in sonically-activated irrigation systems: Impact of tip vertical stroke.声波激活冲洗系统的清洁效果和根尖压力:尖端垂直行程的影响
J Dent Sci. 2025 Jul;20(3):1571-1578. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.12.003. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
2
Comparisons of the smear layer removal efficacy of dual-action irrigants and different activation techniques.双效冲洗剂与不同激活技术去除玷污层效果的比较。
J Dent Sci. 2025 Apr;20(2):877-884. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.003. Epub 2024 Sep 20.
3
Enhancing Root Canal Disinfection with Er:YAG Laser: A Systematic Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of three irrigation methods: SWEEPS, ultrasonic, and traditional irrigation, in smear layer and debris removal abilities in the root canal, beyond the fractured instrument.比较三种冲洗方法:SWEET、超声和传统冲洗,在去除根管内碎片和玷污层方面的能力,超出折断器械。
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2022 Mar;37:102707. doi: 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102707. Epub 2021 Dec 28.
2
Effect of tip insertion depth and irradiation parameters on the efficacy of cleaning calcium hydroxide from simulated lateral canals using Er:YAG laser- or ultrasonic-activated irrigation.尖端插入深度和照射参数对使用铒钇铝石榴石激光或超声激活冲洗从模拟侧支根管中清除氢氧化钙效果的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2021 Mar;16(2):654-660. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
3
用铒激光增强根管消毒:一项系统评价
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Feb 26;13(3):101. doi: 10.3390/dj13030101.
4
Different strategies for treating intracanal fractured instruments in a single tooth: A case report.单颗牙根管内折断器械的不同治疗策略:病例报告
Exp Ther Med. 2024 Aug 28;28(5):411. doi: 10.3892/etm.2024.12700. eCollection 2024 Nov.
5
Smear layer removal efficacy of different irrigation techniques in conservatively instrumented root canals.不同冲洗技术在保守预备根管中对玷污层的去除效果
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jul;19(3):1546-1553. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 24.
6
Microsurgical removal of an invisible fractured endodontic instrument from a mandibular first molar.从下颌第一磨牙中显微外科手术取出一根不可见的折断根管器械。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Jan;19(1):724-725. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.08.008. Epub 2023 Aug 19.
Effect of different irrigation methods in the presence of a separated instrument: an study.不同冲洗方法在器械分离情况下的效果:一项研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2020 Aug;78(6):409-416. doi: 10.1080/00016357.2020.1733076. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
4
Comparison of Screw-In Forces during Movement of Endodontic Files with Different Geometries, Alloys, and Kinetics.不同几何形状、合金成分和动力学的根管锉移动过程中旋入力的比较。
Materials (Basel). 2019 May 8;12(9):1506. doi: 10.3390/ma12091506.
5
Effectiveness of different irrigation systems in the presence of intracanal-separated file.根管内分离锉存在时不同冲洗系统的有效性
Microsc Res Tech. 2019 Mar;82(3):238-243. doi: 10.1002/jemt.23165. Epub 2019 Jan 12.
6
Mechanical and Metallurgical Properties of Various Nickel-Titanium Rotary Instruments.各种镍钛旋转器械的力学和冶金性能。
Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:4528601. doi: 10.1155/2017/4528601. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
7
Efficacy of Photon-induced Photoacoustic Streaming in the Reduction of Enterococcus faecalis within the Root Canal: Different Settings and Different Sodium Hypochlorite Concentrations.光诱导光声流在根管内减少粪肠球菌的疗效:不同设置和不同次氯酸钠浓度。
J Endod. 2017 Oct;43(10):1730-1735. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Fracture Incidence of WaveOne and Reciproc Files during Root Canal Preparation of up to 3 Posterior Teeth: A Prospective Clinical Study.多达 3 颗后牙根管预备期间 WaveOne 和 Reciproc 锉的骨折发生率:一项前瞻性临床研究。
J Endod. 2017 May;43(5):705-708. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2016.12.024. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
9
Instrument fracture in root canals - where, why, when and what? A study from a student clinic.根管内器械折断——发生部位、原因、时间及情况?一项来自学生诊所的研究。
Int Endod J. 2014 Feb;47(2):183-90. doi: 10.1111/iej.12131. Epub 2013 May 25.
10
Visualization of irrigant flow and cavitation induced by Er:YAG laser within a root canal model.可视化冲洗液在根管模型内的流动和 Er:YAG 激光空化。
J Endod. 2011 Jun;37(6):839-43. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.02.035. Epub 2011 Apr 17.