McDougall Seaneen
Centre for Anatomy and Human Identification, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland, DD1 5EH, UK.
MedEdPublish (2016). 2023 Dec 5;13:305. doi: 10.12688/mep.19946.1. eCollection 2023.
The time spent on basic sciences, including clinical anatomy, is decreasing in many medical curricula. While dissection is often seen as a cornerstone of medical education, there is increasing pressure to ensure time spent undertaking dissection is an efficient use of student time. As part of an MBChB clinical anatomy course , 1 year students were asked to complete 'dissection handover diaries', designed through evidence-based pedagogy on reflection and engagement, which encouraged them to reflect on the dissection session and consider clinical applications of the anatomy covered in the session. Student engagement with an activity is important for it to be beneficial to their educational experience. This engagement is often increased when students perceive the activity to be useful to their learning.
A survey was conducted, over two practical lab sessions on the final day of year one dissection in March 2023, using five Likert-type questions and one free-text question to evaluate student perceptions of the newly introduced dissection handover diaries. The survey was developed based on similar studies investigating student preference in dissection-based activities and questions were designed to elicit student perceptions on the usefulness of the diaries with respect to encouraging reflection, clinical application and student engagement in the sessions. Students were asked for constructive comments about the diaries in a free-text response question. Analysis was conducted using quantitative frequency distributions of survey responses as well as qualitative thematic analysis of the free text question.
Of a total of 228 students, 64 participated in the survey, a response rate of 28%. The results were positive overall, with many respondents identifying the diaries as beneficial for reflection, consolidation, clinical application, and engagement.
Students perceived the dissection handover diaries to be useful to their anatomical learning, as well as encouraging reflection and application of knowledge.
在许多医学课程中,包括临床解剖学在内的基础科学课程所占用的时间正在减少。虽然解剖通常被视为医学教育的基石,但确保进行解剖所花费的时间能有效利用学生时间的压力越来越大。作为医学学士和外科学士(MBChB)临床解剖学课程的一部分,一年级学生被要求完成“解剖交接日记”,该日记通过基于证据的反思和参与式教学法设计,鼓励他们反思解剖课程,并思考该课程所涵盖解剖学知识的临床应用。学生对一项活动的参与度对于该活动对他们的教育体验有益至关重要。当学生认为该活动对他们的学习有用时,这种参与度通常会提高。
在2023年3月一年级解剖课程最后一天的两个实践实验室课程期间进行了一项调查,使用五个李克特式问题和一个自由文本问题来评估学生对新引入的解剖交接日记的看法。该调查是基于类似的研究开发的,这些研究调查了学生在基于解剖的活动中的偏好,问题旨在引出学生对日记在鼓励反思、临床应用以及学生在课程中的参与度方面的有用性的看法。在一个自由文本回答问题中,要求学生对日记提出建设性意见。使用调查回复的定量频率分布以及自由文本问题的定性主题分析进行分析。
在总共228名学生中,64名参与了调查,回复率为28%。总体结果是积极的,许多受访者认为日记对反思、巩固、临床应用和参与有益。
学生认为解剖交接日记对他们的解剖学学习有用,同时也鼓励了知识的反思和应用。