Runge Ronja A, Soellner Renate
University of Hildesheim, Germany.
Assessment. 2025 Sep;32(6):878-898. doi: 10.1177/10731911241273446. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
Parent report measures developed in the Western world are commonly used to assess children's mental health, but their cross-cultural comparability is questionable. The present study examines the use of anchoring vignettes to assess and adjust for bias in five countries: the United States, Mexico, Germany, China, and Russia. Parents ( = 500) rated their child's mental health and vignettes depicting internalizing and externalizing problem behaviors in an online survey. Vignette ratings were used to assess bias and for rescaling. Cross-national comparisons of vignette scores revealed differences in the use of the scale range and overall level of vignette scores. Measurement invariance across countries improved after rescaling, resulting in weak invariance for internalizing and strong invariance for externalizing problem behavior. Rescaled scores revealed cross-national differences that were masked using the raw score. Results confirm the lacking cross-national comparability in parent reports of child mental health, and anchoring vignettes appear to be a useful tool for reducing bias.
西方世界开发的家长报告测量方法通常用于评估儿童的心理健康,但其跨文化可比性值得怀疑。本研究考察了在美国、墨西哥、德国、中国和俄罗斯这五个国家使用锚定 vignettes 来评估和调整偏差的情况。500名家长在一项在线调查中对孩子的心理健康以及描述内化和外化问题行为的 vignettes 进行了评分。 vignette 评分用于评估偏差和重新缩放。 vignette 得分的跨国比较揭示了量表范围的使用和 vignette 得分总体水平的差异。重新缩放后,各国之间的测量不变性有所改善,导致内化问题行为的不变性较弱,外化问题行为的不变性较强。重新缩放后的分数揭示了使用原始分数时被掩盖的跨国差异。结果证实了儿童心理健康家长报告中缺乏跨国可比性,而锚定 vignettes 似乎是减少偏差的有用工具。