Department of Sociology, Santa Clara University, 500 El Camino Real, Santa Clara, CA, 95053, USA.
Department of Sociology, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX, 77005, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2024 Sep 11;30(5):41. doi: 10.1007/s11948-024-00505-0.
This research explores the perspectives of academic physicists from three national contexts concerning their roles and responsibilities within the realm of science. Using a dataset comprised of 211 interviews with scientists working in China, the United States, and the United Kingdom, the study seeks to explain whether and in what manner physicists conceptualize scientific ethics within a global or national framework. The empirical findings bring to light disparities across nations in the physicists' perceptions of what constitutes responsible mentorship and engagement in public service. These cross-national variations underscore the moral agency of physicists as they navigate the ethical standards embraced by the global scientific community vis-à-vis those that are specific to their respective national contexts. The study's empirical insights may carry significant implications for both policymakers and ethicists, underscoring the imperative of soliciting and acknowledging the perspectives of academic scientists working and living in disparate national contexts when formulating comprehensive science ethics frameworks. Such inclusive and context-aware approaches to shaping ethics in science can contribute to the cultivation of a more robust and universally relevant ethical foundation for the scientific community.
本研究探讨了来自三个国家背景的学术物理学家对其在科学领域中的角色和责任的看法。该研究使用了由 211 名在中国、美国和英国工作的科学家的访谈组成的数据集,旨在解释物理学家是否以及以何种方式在全球或国家框架内概念化科学伦理。实证结果揭示了各国物理学家对负责任的指导和参与公共服务的看法存在差异。这些跨国差异突显了物理学家在全球科学界所接受的道德标准与各自国家背景特有的道德标准之间进行权衡时的道德代理。该研究的实证见解可能对政策制定者和伦理学家具有重要意义,强调在制定全面的科学伦理框架时,必须征求和承认在不同国家背景下工作和生活的学术科学家的观点。这种包容性和情境意识的方法可以为科学界培养更强大和普遍相关的伦理基础做出贡献。