Department of Clinical Sciences, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam.
PLoS One. 2024 Sep 11;19(9):e0310029. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310029. eCollection 2024.
Obstetric ultrasound is an important tool in managing pregnancies and its use is increasing globally. However, the status of the pregnant woman and the fetus may vary in terms of clinical management, views in the community and legislation. To investigate the views and experiences of Vietnamese health professionals on maternal and fetal health interests, priority setting and potential conflicts, we conducted a cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire. Obstetricians/gynecologists, midwives and sonographers who manage pregnant women in maternity wards were invited to participate. We purposively chose public health facilities in the Hanoi region of Vietnam to obtain a representative sample. The final sample included 882 health professionals, of which 32.7% (n = 289) were obstetricians/gynecologists, 60.7% (n = 535) midwives and 6.6% (n = 58) sonographers. The majority of participants (60.3%) agreed that "The fetus is a person from the time of conception" and that maternal health interests should always be prioritised over fetal health interests in care provided (54.4%). 19.7% agreed that the fetus is never a patient, only the pregnant woman can be the patient, while 60.5% disagreed. Participants who performed ultrasounds were more likely to agree that fetal health interests are being given more weight in decision-making the further the gestation advances compared to those who did not perform ultrasounds (cOR 2.47, CI 1.27-4.79: n = 811). A significant proportion of health professionals in Vietnam assign the fetus the status of being a person, where personhood gradually evolves during pregnancy. While the fetus is often considered a patient with its own health interests, a majority of participants did give priority to maternal health interests. Health professionals appear to favour increased legal protection of the fetus. Strengthening the legal status of the fetus might have adverse implications for maternal autonomy. Measures to restrict maternal autonomy might require close observation to ensure that maternal reproductive rights are protected.
产科超声是管理妊娠的重要工具,其应用在全球范围内不断增加。然而,孕妇和胎儿的状况在临床管理、社区观点和立法方面可能存在差异。为了调查越南卫生专业人员对母婴健康利益、优先事项设定和潜在冲突的看法和经验,我们使用结构化问卷进行了横断面研究。邀请在妇产科病房管理孕妇的妇产科医生/妇科医生、助产士和超声技师参与。我们有意选择越南河内地区的公共卫生机构,以获得具有代表性的样本。最终样本包括 882 名卫生专业人员,其中 32.7%(n=289)为妇产科医生/妇科医生,60.7%(n=535)为助产士,6.6%(n=58)为超声技师。大多数参与者(60.3%)同意“胎儿从受孕时起就是一个人”,并认为在提供的护理中,应始终优先考虑母婴健康利益,而不是胎儿健康利益(54.4%)。19.7%的人同意“胎儿永远不是病人,只有孕妇可以是病人”,而 60.5%的人不同意。与不进行超声检查的参与者相比,进行超声检查的参与者更有可能同意在决策中更重视胎儿健康利益,而不是孕妇健康利益,其差异具有统计学意义(cOR 2.47,CI 1.27-4.79:n=811)。越南相当一部分卫生专业人员将胎儿赋予人的地位,而这种人的地位在妊娠期间逐渐演变。虽然胎儿通常被视为具有自身健康利益的病人,但大多数参与者确实优先考虑母婴健康利益。卫生专业人员似乎赞成增加对胎儿的法律保护。加强胎儿的法律地位可能对产妇自主权产生不利影响。限制产妇自主权的措施可能需要密切观察,以确保产妇的生殖权利得到保护。