• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Developing PRISM: A Pragmatic Institutional Survey and Bench Marking Tool to Measure Digital Research Maturity of Cancer Centers.开发 PRISM:一种实用的机构调查和基准工具,用于衡量癌症中心的数字研究成熟度。
Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):743-750. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788331. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
A digital intervention to improve mental health and interpersonal resilience for young people who have experienced online sexual abuse: the i-Minds non-randomised feasibility clinical trial and nested qualitative study.一项针对遭受网络性虐待的年轻人改善心理健康和人际恢复力的数字干预措施:i-Minds非随机可行性临床试验及嵌套定性研究
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(28):1-27. doi: 10.3310/THAL8732.
4
Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods.使用移动应用程序与其他方法收集的自我管理调查问卷回复的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 27;2015(7):MR000042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
5
A New Measure of Quantified Social Health Is Associated With Levels of Discomfort, Capability, and Mental and General Health Among Patients Seeking Musculoskeletal Specialty Care.一种新的量化社会健康指标与寻求肌肉骨骼专科护理的患者的不适程度、能力以及心理和总体健康水平相关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Apr 1;483(4):647-663. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003394. Epub 2025 Feb 5.
6
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
7
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
8
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
9
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
10
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.

本文引用的文献

1
A federated learning system for precision oncology in Europe: DigiONE.欧洲用于精准肿瘤学的联邦学习系统:DigiONE。
Nat Med. 2024 Feb;30(2):334-337. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02715-8.
2
Single-agent ibrutinib in RESONATE-2™ and RESONATE™ versus treatments in the real-world PHEDRA databases for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia.RESONATE-2™ 和 RESONATE™ 研究中单药伊布替尼与真实世界 PHEDRA 数据库中治疗慢性淋巴细胞白血病患者的治疗方案相比。
Ann Hematol. 2019 Dec;98(12):2749-2760. doi: 10.1007/s00277-019-03830-8. Epub 2019 Nov 19.
3
I-O Optimise: a novel multinational real-world research platform in thoracic malignancies.I-O 优化:一个新的多国胸恶性肿瘤真实世界研究平台。
Future Oncol. 2019 May;15(14):1551-1563. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0025. Epub 2019 Mar 11.

开发 PRISM:一种实用的机构调查和基准工具,用于衡量癌症中心的数字研究成熟度。

Developing PRISM: A Pragmatic Institutional Survey and Bench Marking Tool to Measure Digital Research Maturity of Cancer Centers.

机构信息

IQVIA, London, United Kingdom.

IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori Regina Elena, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Appl Clin Inform. 2024 Aug;15(4):743-750. doi: 10.1055/s-0044-1788331. Epub 2024 Sep 11.

DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1788331
PMID:39260412
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11398970/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multicenter precision oncology real-world evidence requires a substantial long-term investment by hospitals to prepare their data and align on common Clinical Research processes and medical definitions. Our team has developed a self-assessment framework to support hospitals and hospital networks to measure their digital maturity and better plan and coordinate those investments. From that framework, we developed PRISM for Cancer Outcomes: PR: agmatic I: nstitutional S: urvey and benchM: arking.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to develop PRISM as a tool for self-assessment of digital maturity in oncology hospitals and research networks; a secondary objective was to create an initial benchmarking cohort of >25 hospitals using the tool as input for future development.

METHODS

PRISM is a 25-question semiquantitative self-assessment survey developed iteratively from expert knowledge in oncology real-world study delivery. It covers four digital maturity dimensions: (1) Precision oncology, (2) Clinical digital data, (3) Routine outcomes, and (4) Information governance and delivery. These reflect the four main data types and critical enablers for precision oncology research from routine electronic health records.

RESULTS

During piloting with 26 hospitals from 19 European countries, PRISM was found to be easy to use and its semiquantitative questions to be understood in a wide diversity of hospitals. Results within the initial benchmarking cohort aligned well with internal perspectives. We found statistically significant differences in digital maturity, with Precision oncology being the most mature dimension, and Information governance and delivery the least mature.

CONCLUSION

PRISM is a light footprint benchmarking tool to support the planning of large-scale real-world research networks. It can be used to (i) help an individual hospital identify areas most in need of investment and improvement, (ii) help a network of hospitals identify sources of best practice and expertise, and (iii) help research networks plan research. With further testing, policymakers could use PRISM to better plan digital investments around the Cancer Mission and European Digital Health Space.

摘要

背景

多中心精准肿瘤学真实世界证据需要医院进行大量的长期投资,以准备其数据并就共同的临床研究流程和医学定义达成一致。我们的团队开发了一个自我评估框架,以支持医院和医院网络衡量其数字成熟度,并更好地规划和协调这些投资。基于该框架,我们开发了用于癌症结果的 PRISM:PR:agmatic I:nstitutional S:urvey 和 benchM:arking。

目的

主要目标是开发 PRISM 作为评估肿瘤医院和研究网络数字成熟度的工具;次要目标是使用该工具创建一个超过 25 家医院的初始基准测试队列,作为未来发展的输入。

方法

PRISM 是一个 25 个问题的半定量自我评估调查,从肿瘤真实世界研究交付方面的专家知识中迭代开发而来。它涵盖了四个数字成熟度维度:(1)精准肿瘤学,(2)临床数字数据,(3)常规结果,和(4)信息治理和交付。这些反映了从常规电子健康记录中进行精准肿瘤学研究的四个主要数据类型和关键推动因素。

结果

在对来自 19 个欧洲国家的 26 家医院进行试点时,发现 PRISM 使用方便,其半定量问题在广泛的医院中都易于理解。初始基准测试队列中的结果与内部观点吻合良好。我们发现数字成熟度存在统计学上的显著差异,其中精准肿瘤学是最成熟的维度,而信息治理和交付则是最不成熟的维度。

结论

PRISM 是一种轻量级的基准测试工具,可支持大规模真实世界研究网络的规划。它可以用于:(i)帮助单个医院确定最需要投资和改进的领域,(ii)帮助医院网络确定最佳实践和专业知识的来源,以及(iii)帮助研究网络规划研究。通过进一步的测试,政策制定者可以使用 PRISM 更好地规划围绕癌症任务和欧洲数字健康空间的数字投资。