Zanwar Preeti Pushpalata, Yalamanchili Jahnavi, Hu Sisi, Estrada Leah V, Omar Zaliha, Rahemi Zahra
Jefferson College of Population Health at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Irma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy at Texas A&M University, Kingsville, TX, USA; Irma Lerma Rangel College of Pharmacy at Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA; Hopkins Economics of Alzheimer's Disease & Services Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
University of Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA.
Ann Palliat Med. 2024 Nov;13(6):1476-1489. doi: 10.21037/apm-23-527. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
As the global older adult population continues to grow, challenges related to managing multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) or multimorbidity underscore the growing need for palliative care. Palliative care preferences and needs vary significantly based on context, location, and culture. As a result, there is a need for more clarity on what constitutes palliative care in diverse settings. Our objective was to present an international perspective on palliative care in India, a culturally diverse and large ancient Eastern middle-income country. In this narrative review article, we considered three questions when re-designing palliative care for older adults aging-in-place in India: (I) what are the needs for palliative care for persons and their families? (II) Which palliative care domains are essential in assessing improvements in the quality of life (QoL)? (III) What patient reported measures are essential considerations for palliative care? To address these questions, we provide recommendations based on the following key domains: social, behavioral, psychological, cultural, spiritual, medical, bereavement, legal, and economic. Using an established and widely reported conceptual framework on aging and health disparities, we provide how these domains map across multiple levels of influence, such as individual or family members, community, institutions, and health systems for achieving the desired QoL. For greater adoption, reach, and accessibility across diverse India, we conclude palliative care must be carefully and systematically re-designed to be culturally appropriate and community-focused, incorporating traditions, individual preferences, language(s), supports and services from educational and health institutions, community organizations and the government. In addition, national government insurance schemes such as the Ayushman Bharat Yojna can include explicit provisions for palliative care so that it is affordable to all, regardless of ability to pay. In summary, our considerations for incorporating palliative care domains to care of whole person and their families, and provision of supports of services from an array of stakeholders broadly apply to culturally diverse older adults aging in place in India and around the globe who prefer to age and die in place.
随着全球老年人口持续增长,与管理多种慢性病(MCCs)或多重疾病相关的挑战凸显了对姑息治疗的需求不断增加。姑息治疗的偏好和需求因背景、地点和文化而异。因此,需要更明确在不同环境中姑息治疗的构成。我们的目标是呈现印度姑息治疗的国际视角,印度是一个文化多元的大型古老东方中等收入国家。在这篇叙述性综述文章中,我们在为印度居家养老的老年人重新设计姑息治疗时考虑了三个问题:(I)个人及其家庭对姑息治疗的需求是什么?(II)在评估生活质量(QoL)改善方面,哪些姑息治疗领域至关重要?(III)哪些患者报告的指标是姑息治疗的重要考虑因素?为了解决这些问题,我们基于以下关键领域提供建议:社会、行为、心理、文化、精神、医疗、丧亲、法律和经济。利用一个既定且广泛报道的关于衰老和健康差距的概念框架,我们阐述了这些领域如何在多个影响层面上相互映射,例如个人或家庭成员、社区、机构和卫生系统,以实现期望的生活质量。为了在印度各地更广泛地采用、覆盖和提供可及性,我们得出结论,姑息治疗必须经过仔细和系统的重新设计,使其在文化上合适且以社区为重点,纳入传统、个人偏好、语言、来自教育和卫生机构、社区组织及政府的支持和服务。此外,像阿育吠陀国家健康保险计划这样的国家政府保险计划可以纳入姑息治疗的明确条款,以便所有人都能负担得起,无论支付能力如何。总之,我们将姑息治疗领域纳入对整个人及其家庭的护理,并从一系列利益相关者那里提供服务支持的考量,广泛适用于印度及全球各地文化多元、希望在原地养老和离世的居家老年人。